collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ruger hawkeye??  (Read 7766 times)

Offline mossback91

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3196
Ruger hawkeye??
« on: January 17, 2008, 10:17:36 PM »
Does anybody have one? What do you think of it? Like the action?

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6055
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2008, 10:30:31 PM »
I looked at them and like the 77 better and the new hawkeye cost more.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2008, 08:09:09 AM »
I looked at them and like the 77 better and the new hawkeye cost more.

a huge improvement IMO worth the money......well gas is $3.00 a gallon now. rugers were $350 when gas was $.99.................seems relative

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39215
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2008, 08:46:06 AM »
I like them and if I was in the market for a new rifle I'd definitely take a hard look at the Ruger first. The new hawkeye is supposed to have a much improved trigger. The old 77's were known for their terrible triggers.

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6055
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2008, 09:41:50 PM »
The old rugers did have terrible triggers but compare an old 77MK2 with the hawkeye. Really look at them side by side. They are not as well built and all of the wood I have seen so far isn't as nice. I have only looked at 3 though. The gunshop where I was comparing them the hawkeye was $100 more.
 

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2008, 10:31:26 PM »
I'd pay $100 for a stock, and if you own a ruger pre hawkeye you prolly bought a stock......or throw your puppy in the microwave because the factory stock pisses you off so bad.

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6055
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2008, 08:09:44 AM »
 I was talking about the wood stocks on the M77 being nicer. Not the Zytel canoe paddles the call a synthetic stocks.  :chuckle:

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2008, 09:29:37 AM »
I was talking about the wood stocks on the M77 being nicer. Not the Zytel canoe paddles the call a synthetic stocks.  :chuckle:

so was I ;). the m77 wood stock is easily the worst ever, right behind the birch savage. could they have made it any chunkier? I think not. the hawkeye is way more slim and efficient then the m77......they throw in a better finish and trigger for the cost of the stock.....good deal.

Offline mossback91

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3196
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2008, 11:25:20 AM »
I was looking at the all weather model.

Offline mossback91

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3196
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2008, 12:37:48 PM »
Have any of you shot one? or do any of you own one?

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6055
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2008, 02:47:37 PM »
I was talking about the wood stocks on the M77 being nicer. Not the Zytel canoe paddles the call a synthetic stocks.  :chuckle:

so was I ;). the m77 wood stock is easily the worst ever, right behind the birch savage.
It must be the luck of the draw, I have a 77MK1 with a wood stock that would rival a Winchester super grade. With that said I don't have a hunting rifle that isn't synthetic.

Offline Bigshooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 6369
  • Location: Lewis Co
  • High Wide And Heavy
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2008, 02:23:56 PM »
The only thing a m77 is good for is a boat anchor.  Have looked at a few hawkeyes though and have to admit they look and feel pretty nice.  Am considering buy one in the new 375.
Welcome to liberal America, where the truth is condemned and facts are ignored so as not to "offend" anyone


"Borders, language, culture."

Offline Dakota Dogman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 86
Re: Ruger hawkeye??
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2008, 06:36:06 PM »
Just got one in .358 Win. before moving west.  Only shot about 1/2 box of shells through it.  Only one real complaint is the tiny safety has sharp edges.  Not real condusive to fast work or thick gloves.  Feeds well, shoots well, I'm pleased with all but that one little thing.  

Just MHO, but Ruger bolt actions are work horses, not show ponies.  Thick?  Yes.  Ugly? Probably.  Reliable? Almost always.

God Bless,

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

The Mysterious $200,000 by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:42:55 AM]


Hunting by Republic/Ferry county by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:55:58 AM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by ASHQUACK
[Today at 08:28:35 AM]


MT general tag filled by Wingin it
[Today at 08:22:45 AM]


Pearygin Quality by jstone
[Today at 08:13:47 AM]


Grizzly? by bearpaw
[Today at 07:48:15 AM]


Making memories by elkboy
[Today at 07:34:42 AM]


Any success Pearrygin / Chewuch Quality hunters? by davew
[Today at 06:57:32 AM]


Any buck clarification by Tball77
[Yesterday at 09:48:46 PM]


What do I need for elk? by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:20:10 PM]


As He Lay by highside74
[Yesterday at 08:31:17 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by highside74
[Yesterday at 08:15:10 PM]


Idaho Unit 39 wolves by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 06:19:48 PM]


LINCOLN !! by nwwanderer
[Yesterday at 05:11:26 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 04:52:49 PM]


Drew A Bull Moose Tag - 49 Degrees North A, Late hunt NOV 1st- NOV 30th by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 04:03:45 PM]


Lost Zoleo by dutchmanaz
[Yesterday at 02:55:24 PM]


Huck 121 Youth Elk by hunter399
[Yesterday at 01:55:47 PM]


49 degrees north late A moose by hunter399
[Yesterday at 01:38:38 PM]


Saw 25+ does today. No bucks. Is blacktail rut over? by jstone
[Yesterday at 01:11:00 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal