So do yourself a favor and think before you sling elitist arguments. It's a losing argument.
What this proposal is is telling the game commission and public that archers intend to make poor judgments in the field shooting animals when it is too dark to see their arrow; and that they want and expect the game commission and WDFW to back them up when they make these poor decisions. It's in my view one of the poorest justifications I can imagine for electronics on the bow and arrow.
[/quote]
Not the intention to sling anything or try and convince you away from your beliefs so settle down. I believe debate is a healthy thing as it gets issues out in the open. I in no way said that your view is wrong. As a matter of fact I agree with you, that this an issue that perception by the public and commission is huge. If this came to a vote by bowhunters and they were told you can have these nocks but you will lose one day of season nobody would hesitate to dump the nock issue.
I personally would probably use them if they were legal but I have better things to do than to waste my energy on this issue with the state. If the state says "No" I move on and hunt the same way I have been for the last 23 years.
Ray and Bone I know both of you "have been there done that" (no sarcasm intended)so you should both know the Westside and even Eastside dark timber and thick brush is not conducive to finding an arrow that has missed or passed through an animal. Low light does not just happen and dawn and dusk!
Machias I shoot both eyes open and have no problem staying in form and still seeing my arrow but maybe I'm a little weird.

Also all should already know if a hunter is teetering on ethics it's not the equipments fault.