Free: Contests & Raffles.
So now the pics have to be from a stand? They have to be called in dogs? I can see the cap but who cares where the pic is taken?
Quote from: Lowedog on October 28, 2010, 02:01:15 PMSo now the pics have to be from a stand? They have to be called in dogs? I can see the cap but who cares where the pic is taken? Okay then, how about we just take a bunch of copied photos from other websites and post them for our team, would that work?That way we don't even have to leave our computer to gain 10 points.
Quote from: tlbradford on October 28, 2010, 11:33:46 AMQuote from: FALFire on October 28, 2010, 11:24:54 AMI want to clarify my stand on this photo thing. If a caller/photographer goes out and conducts him/herself as a predator hunter would, then calling and photographing a coyote in lieu of shooting it is okay by me. I can somewhat agree with the photo "before the kill" but the jury is still out on that one as it is still one and the same dog. Then again, if it were a CALLED PAIR and only one is killed then perhaps the .5 point should apply or 1 point for the photographer. Calling in a predator and choosing to not shoot it for whatever reason that person feels comfortable with is, almost as good as a dead dog. Some folks have morals, I don't! Like I earlier stated, I have an issue with photographing a coyote from 400 yards out, mousing in the field as one is driving through the toolies at 75 mph, that is not calling predators nor is it hunting. I believe all photos should be reviewed by the mods before a half point is applied to that team. Obviously if it is clear and appears to be called then I'm okay with it, not the blurry mass that looks like a dog on the run through the cornfields.GaryI would be ok with this, if my judgement calls didn't create arguements. I know exactly where you are coming from Gary and I agree. Now that there is a cap on the photo's, do you think we should have a judge, or just try to encourage a higher standard without having an official rule?I agree on the cap at minimum. I would also like to see that all photos are at least reviewed or perhaps put up for discussion and if agreed on by say 3 out of 5 members then the .5 point could be awarded to that team. I realize everyone here may not be the killing type and should have that predator counted. I am certain most here would trust your judgement on what a good photo is. It is the obvious ones that I have issue with. Call'em and shoot'em, either with a camera or a firearm, simple as that.
Quote from: FALFire on October 28, 2010, 11:24:54 AMI want to clarify my stand on this photo thing. If a caller/photographer goes out and conducts him/herself as a predator hunter would, then calling and photographing a coyote in lieu of shooting it is okay by me. I can somewhat agree with the photo "before the kill" but the jury is still out on that one as it is still one and the same dog. Then again, if it were a CALLED PAIR and only one is killed then perhaps the .5 point should apply or 1 point for the photographer. Calling in a predator and choosing to not shoot it for whatever reason that person feels comfortable with is, almost as good as a dead dog. Some folks have morals, I don't! Like I earlier stated, I have an issue with photographing a coyote from 400 yards out, mousing in the field as one is driving through the toolies at 75 mph, that is not calling predators nor is it hunting. I believe all photos should be reviewed by the mods before a half point is applied to that team. Obviously if it is clear and appears to be called then I'm okay with it, not the blurry mass that looks like a dog on the run through the cornfields.GaryI would be ok with this, if my judgement calls didn't create arguements. I know exactly where you are coming from Gary and I agree. Now that there is a cap on the photo's, do you think we should have a judge, or just try to encourage a higher standard without having an official rule?
I want to clarify my stand on this photo thing. If a caller/photographer goes out and conducts him/herself as a predator hunter would, then calling and photographing a coyote in lieu of shooting it is okay by me. I can somewhat agree with the photo "before the kill" but the jury is still out on that one as it is still one and the same dog. Then again, if it were a CALLED PAIR and only one is killed then perhaps the .5 point should apply or 1 point for the photographer. Calling in a predator and choosing to not shoot it for whatever reason that person feels comfortable with is, almost as good as a dead dog. Some folks have morals, I don't! Like I earlier stated, I have an issue with photographing a coyote from 400 yards out, mousing in the field as one is driving through the toolies at 75 mph, that is not calling predators nor is it hunting. I believe all photos should be reviewed by the mods before a half point is applied to that team. Obviously if it is clear and appears to be called then I'm okay with it, not the blurry mass that looks like a dog on the run through the cornfields.Gary
This is just for fun. Some of the pics that have been submitted in the past are when guys are out photographing or at work or whatever. That is the way it has been the last 2 seasons and no one has complained. I don't have a problem with photos at all.