Free: Contests & Raffles.
I doubt they have cameras out in the boonies. motion sensors yes but cameras probably not. Plus if no body was watching said cameras was it recorded. Has it already digitally looped over it. If a crime was committed I would love a conviction but I don't see it happening due to a lack of evidence.
Did anyone get the forward of dustin whitefoot's bull he killed in the colockum recently?
Uh oh Casey I might have some explain.ING to do. Runamuk you got a spare tinfoil hat I can borrow?
Quote from: ipkus on October 12, 2011, 02:41:10 PMQuote from: boneaddict on October 12, 2011, 02:31:25 PMI believe being a foriegn nationalist (or member of a soverign nation) entering a military reservation where something nuclear was being stored and discharging your firearm might constitute an act of war. at least terrorism.......I basically agree...so the question is...Has anyone with at least some first hand knowledge of what happened notified law enforcement? I would have done it already, but don't have enough real information.It would be ridiculous if someone knows for sure that this bull was shot on the reservation (Hanford) 5 days ago and hasn't tried to start the ball rolling. If it is true, maybe they get away with it and maybe they don't, but we should at least TRY to make sure they get what they deserve.Lets say it was shot on the Hanford Reservation. How do you prove it five days later. Proving beyond a shadow of a doubt would be almost impossible. Short of video footage its not gonna happen. Even if they found the gut pile the state is not gonna pay money to do a DNA test. Forget about a conviction. Not gonna happen. If it burns people up that bad write a letter to the editor in your local paper. Forward the live pics and the dead pics. As far as if a member drinks alcohol this does not constitute a break in the treaty. Just like If an American citizen murders a Frenchman while visiting France it does not constitute an act of war. The tribe would have to officially start selling consuming etc for it to ne considered a breach in the treaty. Which as Plateau has said definately doesn't happen.Now as far as being nice to the citizens like article 8 says and how YAK Rezboy and Coastal always pick on poor little me, this is obviously a concerted and organized attempt to hurt my feelings. Verdict.... GUILTY!!
Quote from: boneaddict on October 12, 2011, 02:31:25 PMI believe being a foriegn nationalist (or member of a soverign nation) entering a military reservation where something nuclear was being stored and discharging your firearm might constitute an act of war. at least terrorism.......I basically agree...so the question is...Has anyone with at least some first hand knowledge of what happened notified law enforcement? I would have done it already, but don't have enough real information.It would be ridiculous if someone knows for sure that this bull was shot on the reservation (Hanford) 5 days ago and hasn't tried to start the ball rolling. If it is true, maybe they get away with it and maybe they don't, but we should at least TRY to make sure they get what they deserve.
I believe being a foriegn nationalist (or member of a soverign nation) entering a military reservation where something nuclear was being stored and discharging your firearm might constitute an act of war. at least terrorism.......
Quote from: jackelope on October 12, 2011, 03:50:23 PMIt wasn't you, Run...no worries.You can crawl back under your rock if you want, but don't do it on my account.awe thanks....I have to go there occasionally or the poor toads get lonely ...like that poor cow we abandoned in a basement somewhere....gosh wonder if she is still there.... Quote from: Yak-NDN on October 12, 2011, 04:50:54 PMQuote from: boneaddict on October 12, 2011, 03:12:06 PMQuoteOr I think the tribe has to do something to break or ignore a rule in the treaty and it would cause the entire treaty to be void or have to be rewrittensuch as possessing alcohol on the reservation.Tired of people that don't know what they are talking about. The Tribe has tried to make it a dry rez but the state has said if it is sold in City limits and its not a Tribal business its ok and the tribe can not do anything about it. But the Tribal business can't sell alcohol.yak if this is true how do they get away with selling alcohol on the rez's in casino's (so a indian owned and operated casino on a reservation on indian land not deeded land like the 100 yr lease lands in say tulalip)? serious question would like to know the answer?
It wasn't you, Run...no worries.You can crawl back under your rock if you want, but don't do it on my account.
Quote from: boneaddict on October 12, 2011, 03:12:06 PMQuoteOr I think the tribe has to do something to break or ignore a rule in the treaty and it would cause the entire treaty to be void or have to be rewrittensuch as possessing alcohol on the reservation.Tired of people that don't know what they are talking about. The Tribe has tried to make it a dry rez but the state has said if it is sold in City limits and its not a Tribal business its ok and the tribe can not do anything about it. But the Tribal business can't sell alcohol.
QuoteOr I think the tribe has to do something to break or ignore a rule in the treaty and it would cause the entire treaty to be void or have to be rewrittensuch as possessing alcohol on the reservation.
Or I think the tribe has to do something to break or ignore a rule in the treaty and it would cause the entire treaty to be void or have to be rewritten
got some info today the tribe is meeting wdfw about hanford hunting they r trying to make draw system out of it for yakamas put your name in draw a tag but my name is not going into that draw no fun to shoot an elk that just stands there and looks at u. Does anybody disagree with that?? If so that is what most people complain about the yakamas driving around all willy nilly shooting whatever they want at least it will be a controlled hunt, one of my ideas was to put some stipulations on the hunt a good one to start would not be able to sell the horns.