collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?  (Read 15872 times)

Offline mallard79

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 776
  • Location: Monroe
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2011, 02:23:14 PM »
Barnes recommends 0.050 off the lands per their reloading manual.

Offline MuleDeerCrazy

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 374
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #16 on: December 20, 2011, 04:47:24 PM »
The Weatherby's seem to be so deep I can't get close to the lands anyway... guess I'll just go with the max. length in the Barnes book, although that will be different between the TTSX and the TSX given the difference of the tip.  Their max. was without the tip...?

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #17 on: December 20, 2011, 06:47:03 PM »
Seriously, load a few seated deep.....thank me later.

I know this works for a fact with one of my .300 Win Magnums. Loaded them to mag length. Then seated them deeper a little at a time untill the groups really started to tighten up to the point I couldnt ask anymore of a factory rifle and barrel but my .270 Winchester likes them way out there. I mean WAY OUT THERE!

From left to right:
3 .375 Ultra Magnums with 260gr Accubonds, .270 Win/140gr Accubond, .270 Win/140gr Barnes TTSX.


Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39181
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2011, 06:56:08 PM »
I can't tell for sure from the picture, but from the looks of it, the bullet isn't in far enough for the neck of the case to have a secure grip on it. I wouldn't trust it.

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #19 on: December 20, 2011, 07:14:26 PM »
I can't tell for sure from the picture, but from the looks of it, the bullet isn't in far enough for the neck of the case to have a secure grip on it. I wouldn't trust it.

Shoots like a dream, feeds from the mag box slicker than a snakes ass. I dont use the dinky thing on anything but yotes and chucks.  :tup:

My mistake, that's a 130gr Accubond, not a 140. I pulled my file for the rifle and took a pic of one of its last groups. I haven't shot the rifle since last year, not to shabby for a 299.00 factory Remington 700 ADL synthetic. ;) I've paid a truck load more for rifles to shoot as well.

« Last Edit: December 20, 2011, 07:30:14 PM by Biggerhammer »

Offline fremont

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 301
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #20 on: December 20, 2011, 08:17:10 PM »
Barnes recommends 0.050 off the lands per their reloading manual.

My recollection as well.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #21 on: December 20, 2011, 10:23:35 PM »
Bobcat, neck tension is enough to hold bullets firm in all but the most viscous recoil monsters. Cannurles are not necessary and seating to a groove on a tsx is equally unnecessary.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39181
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #22 on: December 20, 2011, 10:27:21 PM »
Bobcat, neck tension is enough to hold bullets firm in all but the most viscous recoil monsters. Cannurles are not necessary and seating to a groove on a tsx is equally unnecessary.


I realize that's normally the case but in that photo the bullet looks to be just barely inside the neck of the case. Maybe the bullet is longer than I think.


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hoof Rot by kentrek
[Today at 03:50:07 PM]


Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by Feathernfurr
[Today at 03:44:11 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems by CP
[Today at 01:36:59 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by HighlandLofts
[Today at 12:01:17 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by GWP
[Today at 11:29:07 AM]


where is everyone? by nwwanderer
[Today at 11:12:50 AM]


Oregon special tag info by JakeLand
[Today at 10:27:35 AM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:38:55 AM]


Get ready for the 4th of July by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:36:56 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 09:15:32 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 09:09:55 AM]


Idaho Mt goat draft plan by time2hunt
[Today at 07:59:04 AM]


Cougar Problems Toroda Creek Road Near Bodie by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:52:17 AM]


Disabled Fishing License by Blacklab
[Today at 07:44:43 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by jackelope
[Today at 07:18:59 AM]


Missoula Fishing by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:30:10 PM]


Buck age by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:08:41 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Tbar
[Yesterday at 10:55:37 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 07:36:21 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 07:28:59 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal