Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: bigtex on March 08, 2012, 03:47:20 PMRemember, DNR is not there to provide recreational access. DNR is there to bring in revenue to the state, mainly through timber/logging, but also through things such as agricultural leases and shellfish leases.Please define how DNR is to ensure a "rich quality of life" and what that entails. DNR is certainly there to add to the recreational smorgasboard of Washington.QuoteOUR MISSIONIn partnership with citizens and governments, the Washington State DNR provides innovative leadership and expertise to ensure environmental protection, public safety, perpetual funding for schools and communities, and a rich quality of life.http://www.dnr.wa.gov/AboutDNR/Mission/Pages/Home.aspx
Remember, DNR is not there to provide recreational access. DNR is there to bring in revenue to the state, mainly through timber/logging, but also through things such as agricultural leases and shellfish leases.
OUR MISSIONIn partnership with citizens and governments, the Washington State DNR provides innovative leadership and expertise to ensure environmental protection, public safety, perpetual funding for schools and communities, and a rich quality of life.
Certainly DNR does add to the recreational opportunity, but that is not their mission, hence why the word "recreation" is not in their mission statement. Their main goal is $$$. The commercial activities on DNR lands funds schools, public safety and communites, thus enhancing a "rich quality of life".
they can go pound sand, p!$$ up a rope, bite me... every saying you can think of! I haven't and will NEVER buy another *censored*ed pass to use land that belongs to the state of washington! BITE ME!
We puchased one because we went to the Yakima Sportsman's Show then went to all the nearby feeding stations which require the Discover Pass. I think the passes we get with our game licenses should cover it but it did not so we bought it to see the feeding stations.
Even if you get a ticket once every 3 years it is still cheaper to not buy the pass for those 3 years. Odds are I'll be money ahead by the end of 2013.
Quote from: manbearpig on March 25, 2012, 11:35:15 PMEven if you get a ticket once every 3 years it is still cheaper to not buy the pass for those 3 years. Odds are I'll be money ahead by the end of 2013. That would depend on whether you get the $100 ticket, or the $200 ticket.