Free: Contests & Raffles.
Depends on what type of hunting you're doing...If you're covering lots of ground without trails, that 50lbs can be a pain. Try bushwacking through brush on a steep hillside and see how fast you tire with 50+ lbs on your back. Hiking up/down a well groomed hiking trail with a 50lb pack, piece of cake. People count ounces, because ounces add up to pounds, and pounds slow you down and require more effort/energy on your part to do the same amount of "work". What one "can do" and what one "would rather do" are often on completely different ends of the spectrum.Can't argue with the importance of being in shape, but wouldn't it be great to be in shape AND cut your pack weight by 10-15 pounds? That's why people count ounces, not because they would rather avoid getting "in shape".
Any one have experience with the tenzing line of packs? Looks like some good stuff for the same price as competitors.
I have found that the Hiking Companies have had many decades to perfect the pack needed to take gear on extended trips, with comfort.
Quote from: deerslyr on April 19, 2012, 09:34:19 PMAny one have experience with the tenzing line of packs? Looks like some good stuff for the same price as competitors.There is a review on rockslide.com They got a few to try out given they are a site sponsor over there.
Quote from: GoPlayOutside on April 19, 2012, 08:49:04 PMI have found that the Hiking Companies have had many decades to perfect the pack needed to take gear on extended trips, with comfort. There is a huge difference though. Those packs are designed for approaches and summits with 50lbs....not pack outs with 150lbs. The first mountaneering pack that can haul 150lbs comfortably I will buy on the spot. There is a starting weight sacrifice for the ability to haul heavy loads. Timberlines may be swinging that sacrifice but there is still a little proving to be done with that new line IMO.