collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Backcountry Packs  (Read 123197 times)

Offline Branden

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 377
  • Location: nodak
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #105 on: May 08, 2012, 02:49:01 PM »
I have the cabelas outfitter backpack, works great for me. the only problem i have is when im riding a bike with a fully loaded pack it digs into my back. they a bit on the heavy side but very well built and tons of room.

as far as packing out a elk in one trip you guys are crazy, one mature elk equals 5 trips for me. approx 90lbs of meat in four packs then the horns and cape in another counts for the 5th.

Are you saying that you get 360 lbs. of boned out meat from your mature elk? Or is that with the bone?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


that is a very achievable number for a mature bull elk

Not a Rocky Mountain bull, it could have been a Roosevelt but it's unlikely. Show me some evidence of a Rocky Mountain bull living in the wild that weighed over 1000 lbs on the hoof. The vast majority of mature Rocky Mountain bulls will never exceed 700-750 lbs. even it they live to 8 or 9 years old. A 750 lb. bull would have roughly 250 lbs. of meat on their entire body and that would be a huge bull.

To get 360 lbs. of boned put meat from an elk would indicate that the bull weighed around 1080 lbs. on the hoof. (If they took every scrap of meat) If you look at scientific data on the weight of elk this just does not happen and the few times that elk were recorded that weighed 1100 lbs. or more, they were from Vancouver Island and Afognak. I read this info in North American Elk Ecology and Management, if you are curious where I got my info.

Maybe someone has proof of getting 360 lbs. of meat from an elk, but I would bet it's more likely an over estimation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Slim, the last bull I packed out was a little over 460 lbs of boned meat, antler, and cape. Now the area it was shot in is considered a rocky mountain elk. (Eastern Washington) The weight is extremely accurate since it was weighed at a shipping store.

Maybe I packed out to much cape, the antlers were heavier then usual, or the bull was on roids. Idk.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3501
  • Location: west coast
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #106 on: May 08, 2012, 02:55:59 PM »
prolly should go on a new thread but yeah wev had idaho bulls go up to 430 pounds of meat,(no bone or cape). but more typical for a mature bull is 330 to 360 pounds of boned out meat.maybe there is somthing in the water  :dunno:


Offline colockumelk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 4910
  • Location: Watertown, NY
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #107 on: May 08, 2012, 03:03:33 PM »
Mike,
As far as the weight of the pack goes.... IMHO I will take a pack that weighs 9lbs that can haul 100lbs comfortably than a pack that weighs 6lbs that can only haul 60-80lbs comfortably.  (Not saying the Kifaru can't haul 100lbs comfortably)  The point being is that for a bivy hunt if the 9lb pack hauls gear and/or meat better than a 6lb pack with the same amount of gear you will enjoy the heavier pack more.  When your pack is loaded down with all your gear, used as a day pack or hauling meat, if the 9lb pack is more comfortable and is a better design than the 6lb pack you will not notice the 3lb difference.  The heavier pack will feel more comfortable. 

Personally I went with the Mystery Ranch because of the ability to swap out the bags on the same frame.  The initial cost of buying the NICE frame with the Longbow was shocking but down the road when I buy the 6500 the sticker price wont be bad.  Also the 6500 comes with a day pack lid.  And as far as how the day pack lid straps down to the Longbow or other Mystery Ranch bags...  Yes there are extra buckles that are there specifically for the day pack lid. 

I was unsure of if I was going to be able to do 5 days with the Longbow.  But after playing with it a bit it is obvious that I will be able to do it.  ALL of my gear fits inside the bag itself.  I will have to purchase the 2 side pockets in order to put food in it for 5 days.  There are so many lashing points that I really don't need the day pack lid.  But it is something that I want so that I have the ability to do 3-4 days during the late season.  Also for more room or gear I can strap my sleeping bag to the bottom of the pack and my tent or sleeping matt to the outside as well for even more room.  OR I can put those items in between the bag and the pack.  In short I feel that if I pack properly I can do 4 days during the late season with no problem with the Longbow.  You could definately do this with a crew cab and load cells. 
"We Sleep Safe In Our Beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those that would do us harm."
Author: George Orwell

Offline slim9300

  • Democrat = Socialist
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 560
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Backcountry Packs
« Reply #108 on: May 08, 2012, 03:04:10 PM »
I have the cabelas outfitter backpack, works great for me. the only problem i have is when im riding a bike with a fully loaded pack it digs into my back. they a bit on the heavy side but very well built and tons of room.

as far as packing out a elk in one trip you guys are crazy, one mature elk equals 5 trips for me. approx 90lbs of meat in four packs then the horns and cape in another counts for the 5th.

Are you saying that you get 360 lbs. of boned out meat from your mature elk? Or is that with the bone?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


that is a very achievable number for a mature bull elk

Not a Rocky Mountain bull, it could have been a Roosevelt but it's unlikely. Show me some evidence of a Rocky Mountain bull living in the wild that weighed over 1000 lbs on the hoof. The vast majority of mature Rocky Mountain bulls will never exceed 700-750 lbs. even it they live to 8 or 9 years old. A 750 lb. bull would have roughly 250 lbs. of meat on their entire body and that would be a huge bull.

To get 360 lbs. of boned put meat from an elk would indicate that the bull weighed around 1080 lbs. on the hoof. (If they took every scrap of meat) If you look at scientific data on the weight of elk this just does not happen and the few times that elk were recorded that weighed 1100 lbs. or more, they were from Vancouver Island and Afognak. I read this info in North American Elk Ecology and Management, if you are curious where I got my info.

Maybe someone has proof of getting 360 lbs. of meat from an elk, but I would bet it's more likely an over estimation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Slim, the last bull I packed out was a little over 460 lbs of boned meat, antler, and cape. Now the area it was shot in is considered a rocky mountain elk. (Eastern Washington) The weight is extremely accurate since it was weighed at a shipping store.

Maybe I packed out to much cape, the antlers were heavier then usual, or the bull was on roids. Idk.

What did just the meat weigh? Do you have a pic of the bull?

That would be a roughly 1200 animal on the hoof which is pretty hard to picture. Either way, that's a world record type weight. :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Work hard. Be happy. Annoy a Liberal. :wink:
2012 Bowtech Insanity CPXL (Crackerized!) #61/31" DL (Gold Tip Pro ~ 455 grains @ 290 fps = 86 lbs. KE!)
University of Washington; Foster School of Business Alum

Offline MichaelJ

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 3075
  • Location: Washington/Idaho
    • www.facebook.com/hellscanyonarmory
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #109 on: May 08, 2012, 03:14:43 PM »
I've heard rumors that the bulls in SE WA have some Rosie way back in their genetics, hence a lot of crowned tops and huge bodies.  Don't have a clue if this is true or not, but I wouldn't be surprised...

Branden, yeah I'm starting to realize the kifaru is about where I'm at for what I want/need.  We'll see what i can't sell to get some more $ scraped up!

Mike
Hells Canyon Armory Custom Rifles
https://www.facebook.com/HellsCanyonArmory/
HCARifles@gmail.com

Offline Branden

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 377
  • Location: nodak
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #110 on: May 08, 2012, 03:35:38 PM »

What did just the meat weigh? Do you have a pic of the bull?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't know what just the meat weighed because I weighed some of the meat with the antlers and cape. Yea I have some pictures. Maybe I kept a lot of extra hide? bucklucky mounted it so maybe he will let us know if there was a ton extra?

Offline MichaelJ

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 3075
  • Location: Washington/Idaho
    • www.facebook.com/hellscanyonarmory
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #111 on: May 08, 2012, 03:54:23 PM »
Mike,
As far as the weight of the pack goes.... IMHO I will take a pack that weighs 9lbs that can haul 100lbs comfortably than a pack that weighs 6lbs that can only haul 60-80lbs comfortably.  (Not saying the Kifaru can't haul 100lbs comfortably)  The point being is that for a bivy hunt if the 9lb pack hauls gear and/or meat better than a 6lb pack with the same amount of gear you will enjoy the heavier pack more.  When your pack is loaded down with all your gear, used as a day pack or hauling meat, if the 9lb pack is more comfortable and is a better design than the 6lb pack you will not notice the 3lb difference.  The heavier pack will feel more comfortable. 

Personally I went with the Mystery Ranch because of the ability to swap out the bags on the same frame.  The initial cost of buying the NICE frame with the Longbow was shocking but down the road when I buy the 6500 the sticker price wont be bad.  Also the 6500 comes with a day pack lid.  And as far as how the day pack lid straps down to the Longbow or other Mystery Ranch bags...  Yes there are extra buckles that are there specifically for the day pack lid. 

I was unsure of if I was going to be able to do 5 days with the Longbow.  But after playing with it a bit it is obvious that I will be able to do it.  ALL of my gear fits inside the bag itself.  I will have to purchase the 2 side pockets in order to put food in it for 5 days.  There are so many lashing points that I really don't need the day pack lid.  But it is something that I want so that I have the ability to do 3-4 days during the late season.  Also for more room or gear I can strap my sleeping bag to the bottom of the pack and my tent or sleeping matt to the outside as well for even more room.  OR I can put those items in between the bag and the pack.  In short I feel that if I pack properly I can do 4 days during the late season with no problem with the Longbow.  You could definately do this with a crew cab and load cells. 

Fully understand what you're saying Chris (It's Chris right? lol)!

Actually I bought a new pack last year for day hunts cause I got a smoking deal on it.  Brand new blacks creek barbarian 2.5.  The pack weighs in at that 9 lb range and has one of the MOST comfortable suspension systems I've ever worn.  It handles loads up to 60-70 lbs like a dream.  Much more comfortable than my BL2200 ever was (adjustable torso really helps with this!) and I take it with me now because even though it is a couple lbs heavier, its more comfortable (like what you're saying).
However it is just a day pack, and honestly isn't very well thought out.  It doesn't expand hardly at all, and for the amount of straps/buckles that come on it you think it would!  I could do an overnighter or two in it, but there is no way I could pack a substantial amount of meat+ gear...  We struggle to fit two elk front shoulders plus  backstraps in it when it was COMPLETELY empty.  It took the weight well but now that I'm out of college I need something that'll allow me to get farther into the backcountry than your average weekend trips I've been taking.

If I can get away with the Kifaru for <6 lbs and under $700 then I think I'm just going to wait and see if I can't "buy once cry once" and be done with it.  That extra 3.5 lbs I've saved help justify my packing in a 12 lb rifle... lol

Mike
Hells Canyon Armory Custom Rifles
https://www.facebook.com/HellsCanyonArmory/
HCARifles@gmail.com

Offline MichaelJ

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 3075
  • Location: Washington/Idaho
    • www.facebook.com/hellscanyonarmory
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #112 on: May 08, 2012, 04:07:29 PM »
Slim,

Check out page 19 of this thread... you yourself posted in it regarding elk weights...
Start with post #272 bucklucky's and read down.  There's talk of Roosevelt blood being in the blues and rear elk quarters boning out at 80 lbs.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?topic=78449.msg980520#msg980520

Mike
Hells Canyon Armory Custom Rifles
https://www.facebook.com/HellsCanyonArmory/
HCARifles@gmail.com

Offline slim9300

  • Democrat = Socialist
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 560
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Backcountry Packs
« Reply #113 on: May 08, 2012, 04:32:33 PM »
Slim,

Check out page 19 of this thread... you yourself posted in it regarding elk weights...
Start with post #272 bucklucky's and read down.  There's talk of Roosevelt blood being in the blues and rear elk quarters boning out at 80 lbs.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?topic=78449.msg980520#msg980520

Mike

I remember the thread pretty well. It was a good discussion. Just add it up though. Even at 160 lbs. for the boned out hind quarters (which is a ton of meat for a hind quarter) that leaves how much meat for the rest of the animal? The vast majority of the meat on an elk is in the hind quarters. One might get 40-45 lbs. from a front quarter but I can't even imagine that.

I know they vary by region a LOT. I saw it with the huge elk in the Gila. I just don't know if I can trust some of the weights I hear guys saying they get. I have killed too many elk (not to mention broken too many down) to not be somewhat skeptical. IDK. In the grand scheme of things it's not really a big deal. We are all eating elk and that's what matters. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: May 08, 2012, 04:39:11 PM by slim9300 »
Work hard. Be happy. Annoy a Liberal. :wink:
2012 Bowtech Insanity CPXL (Crackerized!) #61/31" DL (Gold Tip Pro ~ 455 grains @ 290 fps = 86 lbs. KE!)
University of Washington; Foster School of Business Alum

Offline MichaelJ

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 3075
  • Location: Washington/Idaho
    • www.facebook.com/hellscanyonarmory
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #114 on: May 08, 2012, 05:03:25 PM »
Slim,

Check out page 19 of this thread... you yourself posted in it regarding elk weights...
Start with post #272 bucklucky's and read down.  There's talk of Roosevelt blood being in the blues and rear elk quarters boning out at 80 lbs.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?topic=78449.msg980520#msg980520

Mike

I remember the thread pretty well. It was a good discussion. Just add it up though. Even at 160 lbs. for the boned out hind quarters (which is a ton of meat for a hind quarter) that leaves how much meat for the rest of the animal? The vast majority of the meat on an elk is in the hind quarters. One might get 40-45 lbs. from a front quarter but I can't even imagine that.

I know they vary by region a LOT. I saw it with the huge elk in the Gila. I just don't know if I can trust some of the weights I hear guys saying they get. I have killed too many elk (not to mention broken too many down) to not be somewhat skeptical. IDK. In the grand scheme of things it's not really a big deal. We are all eating elk and that's what matters. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Totally agree... ive only killed two myself but have helped pack a lot more... actually helped pack out Charlie's Blues bull but showed up after it was hanging...

Does anybody know where that YouTube video is on here of those monster bulls from the Dayton running through a field is?  I remember their bodies being huge!
Hells Canyon Armory Custom Rifles
https://www.facebook.com/HellsCanyonArmory/
HCARifles@gmail.com

Offline huntingalways

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 6
  • Location: butte,montana
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #115 on: May 12, 2012, 07:41:46 AM »
Yes my torso length is 19.5 and really helps with all hunting packs. I have Hunting partners that have a hell of a time packing out heavy loads with most packs because they are under 18" torsos.

Offline colockumelk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 4910
  • Location: Watertown, NY
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #116 on: May 12, 2012, 04:45:49 PM »
Most quality packs that have an adjustable torso length are more comfortable with shorter torso guys than tall torso guys because the load lifters are more functional.  :twocents:
"We Sleep Safe In Our Beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those that would do us harm."
Author: George Orwell

Offline Branden

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 377
  • Location: nodak
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #117 on: May 13, 2012, 08:19:52 AM »
Most quality packs that have an adjustable torso length are more comfortable with shorter torso guys than tall torso guys because the load lifters are more functional.  :twocents:

Exactly

Offline 7mag.

  • Blacktail Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 2968
  • Location: Buckley
  • YAR member
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #118 on: May 13, 2012, 10:56:01 AM »
I have a Mystery Ranch BDSB, that I really like. It carries weight well, and it is huge when expanded all the way. I hope to compare it to a buddy's Kifaru T1 this summer.
Semper Fi. USMC

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3076
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Backcountry Packs
« Reply #119 on: May 13, 2012, 08:34:21 PM »
Huntinalways how do you like the ox? I like the features of that pack.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Today at 10:29:56 AM]


Drew A Bull Moose Tag - 49 Degrees North A, Late hunt NOV 1st- NOV 30th by Buckblaster
[Today at 10:09:13 AM]


Aquapod/Sneak boat by Big G
[Today at 09:57:53 AM]


Animal sounds at Game Commission Meeting, Wow by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:55:34 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by millerwheeler
[Today at 09:35:17 AM]


GMU 530 bear prospects by redi
[Today at 09:00:15 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by bigboy
[Today at 08:55:28 AM]


Second Chance Bull by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Today at 08:48:31 AM]


Any buck clarification by hunter399
[Today at 08:17:28 AM]


More special privileges by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:45:41 AM]


Any success Pearrygin / Chewuch Quality hunters? by Onlybucks
[Yesterday at 11:13:24 PM]


WWF launches public campaign "Not my WDFW" to oust Director Susewind by RC
[Yesterday at 07:28:50 PM]


Pearygin Quality by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 06:38:57 PM]


Fishing the East Cape in Baja? by Elkman
[Yesterday at 06:28:54 PM]


Hunting by Republic/Ferry county by Jimmer
[Yesterday at 06:00:16 PM]


The Mysterious $200,000 by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 12:10:37 PM]


Grizzly? by The Gobble-stopper
[Yesterday at 11:20:01 AM]


mushroom id on a hemlock by The Gobble-stopper
[Yesterday at 11:10:47 AM]


Making memories by pashok23
[Yesterday at 10:40:31 AM]


Meet Kumpel by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:55:26 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal