Hunter facing charges after death of beloved elk named Bullwinkle

[kiticaashunter]

Here is the bull I was referring to.




(photo removed at owner request)

Not sure why the pic was deleted?  It says it was by owner request?  This is a pic that is available on the internet in many places.  By posting it no rules of this forum were broken.  This is just another tame front yard bull, and in this case  bait was used. So l once again here is the pic.

If this gets removed again please provide a legitimate reason for doing so. Not a single one of your rules was broken the first time I posted it or this time.


This bull is not relevant  to the thread and as stated the owner requested it's removal .  No other explanation needed, please do not post a 3rd time.

Relevancy is a matter of opinion. I think there is alot that can be compared in th e two. And I guess you don't need to give me another reason for its removal. The other pics stay up even as the author was asked to remove them? I guess the owner can make his own choices on this. Discrimination is a nasty and illegal thing, and this thread has touched or crossed that line.

[emac]

Here is the bull I was referring to.




(photo removed at owner request)

Not sure why the pic was deleted?  It says it was by owner request?  This is a pic that is available on the internet in many places.  By posting it no rules of this forum were broken.  This is just another tame front yard bull, and in this case  bait was used. So l once again here is the pic.

If this gets removed again please provide a legitimate reason for doing so. Not a single one of your rules was broken the first time I posted it or this time.


This bull is not relevant  to the thread and as stated the owner requested it's removal .  No other explanation needed, please do not post a 3rd time.

Relevancy is a matter of opinion. I think there is alot that can be compared in th e two. And I guess you don't need to give me another reason for its removal. The other pics stay up even as the author was asked to remove them? I guess the owner can make his own choices on this. Discrimination is a nasty and illegal thing, and this thread has touched or crossed that line.

How are they relevant? Here are the facts.
1. One bull was shot in a gmu you that is not opened to branched antler bulls. The other bull was shot in a unit that there were 54 branched antler bull tags given out last year.
2. One bull was under investigation of the Wdfw and the other one never had any investigation.
3. One bull investigation was sent to the prosecutors office and charges were filled the other bull was never investigated.
4. The person who shot one bull has a court date and the other bull was still never investigated.

So the me again how they are relevant. As I stated before is the bull was shot in an open gmu there wouldn't of been 3 threads on this and nobody would of cared

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

[kiticaashunter]

Here is the bull I was referring to.




(photo removed at owner request)

Not sure why the pic was deleted?  It says it was by owner request?  This is a pic that is available on the internet in many places.  By posting it no rules of this forum were broken.  This is just another tame front yard bull, and in this case  bait was used. So l once again here is the pic.

If this gets removed again please provide a legitimate reason for doing so. Not a single one of your rules was broken the first time I posted it or this time.


This bull is not relevant  to the thread and as stated the owner requested it's removal .  No other explanation needed, please do not post a 3rd time.

Relevancy is a matter of opinion. I think there is alot that can be compared in th e two. And I guess you don't need to give me another reason for its removal. The other pics stay up even as the author was asked to remove them? I guess the owner can make his own choices on this. Discrimination is a nasty and illegal thing, and this thread has touched or crossed that line.

How are they relevant? Here are the facts.
1. One bull was shot in a gmu you that is not opened to branched antler bulls. The other bull was shot in a unit that there were 54 branched antler bull tags given out last year.
2. One bull was under investigation of the Wdfw and the other one never had any investigation.
3. One bull investigation was sent to the prosecutors office and charges were filled the other bull was never investigated.
4. The person who shot one bull has a court date and the other bull was still never investigated.

So the me again how they are relevant. As I stated before is the bull was shot in an open gmu there wouldn't of been 3 threads on this and nobody would of cared

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

They are relevant in the way that many on herd have claimed shooting the one bull in the field was not hunting. Yet this other tame bull gets killed in a even less sporting fashion and nobody cares.

[h20hunter]

It was a legal hunt with no legal issues pending . The owner asked that it not be posted .  They have the right to ask  this and any other website where it is posted .  We respected that request and will continue  to do do. You are the only one making the comparison  and frankly  it is childish and tiresome . 

[kiticaashunter]

It was a legal hunt with no legal issues pending . The owner asked that it not be posted .  They have the right to ask  this and any other website where it is posted .  We respected that request and will continue  to do do. You are the only one making the comparison  and frankly  it is childish and tiresome .

I have kept my posts within the forum rules and will continue to.

[h20hunter]

I have again been asked by the owner to have the pic of their bull removed. I'd like to pay attention to my ribs in the smoker, not removing pis already removed for reasons that don't need repeating.  Do not repost.

[bearpaw]

Here is the bull I was referring to.




(photo removed at owner request)

Not sure why the pic was deleted?  It says it was by owner request?  This is a pic that is available on the internet in many places.  By posting it no rules of this forum were broken.  This is just another tame front yard bull, and in this case  bait was used. So l once again here is the pic.

If this gets removed again please provide a legitimate reason for doing so. Not a single one of your rules was broken the first time I posted it or this time.

( photo removed at request of owner )

You messaged me and I explained that the photo was removed at the owners request. I informed you that I have no idea who you are so your requests to remove Reichert's photos have no bearing. If you are a friend of Todd Reichert's please let him that I invited him to join the forum and tell his side of the story. I also provided you with my email and phone number so Mr Reichert can request removal of his photos if he chooses not to join the forum. I have made it abundantly clear that I am neutral on this issue and believe a person is innocent until proven guilty. If Todd Reichert sees any particular post that contains untruthful information tell him to let me know and it will be removed.

[bearpaw]

Here is the bull I was referring to.




(photo removed at owner request)

Not sure why the pic was deleted?  It says it was by owner request?  This is a pic that is available on the internet in many places.  By posting it no rules of this forum were broken.  This is just another tame front yard bull, and in this case  bait was used. So l once again here is the pic.

If this gets removed again please provide a legitimate reason for doing so. Not a single one of your rules was broken the first time I posted it or this time.

( photo removed at request of owner )

You messaged me and I explained that the photo was removed at the owners request. I informed you that I have no idea who you are so your requests to remove Reichert's photos have no bearing. If you are a friend of Todd Reichert's please let him that I invited him to join the forum and tell his side of the story. I also provided you with my email and phone number so Mr Reichert can request removal of his photos if he chooses not to join the forum. I have made it abundantly clear that I am neutral on this issue and believe a person is innocent until proven guilty. If Todd Reichert sees any particular post that contains untruthful information tell him to let me know and it will be removed.

I don't visit many other forums and do not know what photos are in the public domain and can be used without owner permission. The owner requested removal so I removed it. Until I learn otherwise from legal council we will continue to remove photos posted by others when the owner of the photo requests removal.

[Boss .300 winmag]

Any word on the court activities today? 

[HntnFsh]

Any word on the court activities today? 

Was wondering the same thing.

[DaveMonti]

Everything was dismissed and the judge presided over a severe dressing down of the prosecutor for bringing "trumped up bogus charges against this fine gentleman". 

[h20hunter]

Oh Dave you are gonna kick the Hornets nest !   

[DaveMonti]

I'm heavily invested in pharmaceuticals and am hoping to raise the collective blood pressure of the Pacific Northwest. 

[teanawayslayer]

Any word on the court activities today? 

Was wondering the same thing.

I saw on the county website that there were two court dates in the near future.

[danderson]

I hope it gets moved to Upper county district court, I'm have jury duty for the month, court cases on held on Thursdays