collapse
Berry Game Calls!

Author Topic: Harvest stats  (Read 1657 times)

Offline Stalkin Prey

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2016
  • Posts: 216
Harvest stats
« on: April 19, 2018, 02:13:46 PM »
Been digging into harvest stats trying to figure out my starting point for this season and Iím rather shocked at some of the stats. How accurate do you guys think they are? I know I reported honestly (tag soup) and in the correct units but things arenít quite adding up, I know itís basically an ďhonorĒ system and guys will report false info but how much do you think is actually false? Do you guys take harvest stats into consideration when planning your seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2716
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2018, 02:22:42 PM »
I do!
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline EyeTooth

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 172
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2018, 03:06:24 PM »
Yes

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17883
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2018, 04:07:09 PM »
It's far better information than no information. :twocents:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Stein

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 3811
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2018, 05:21:19 PM »
I do, fair assumption they are relatively similar accuracy across units.  You also have to look for units where a bunch of the harvest happens on private.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1986
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2018, 05:51:34 PM »
It is statistically accurate.  My understanding is hunter reporting is not what you would expect it to be.  Unfortunately many do not report and there are the ones who just lie.  I think that is said.  Harvest reporting is the best tool they have.  So when hunters complain who is really at fault.

Online elkchaser54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 188
  • Location: Walla Walla
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2018, 10:01:32 AM »
The state just needs to move to a system where in order for your TAG to be valid when punched you must register it online as harvested.  So these numbers are accurate

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 3479
  • Location: Central Washington/Central Montana
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2018, 10:11:12 AM »
 :dunno: No internet in a lot of the places people get their harvest's.I would hate for the wdfw to force hunters to carry cell phones.Then it would turn into illegally hunting without internet.

  QUOTE:                                                                                                                   (The state just needs to move to a system where in order for your TAG to be valid when punched you must register it online as harvested.  So these numbers are accurate)
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline teanawayslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 2399
  • Location: Eastside
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2018, 10:15:24 AM »
It is statistically accurate.  My understanding is hunter reporting is not what you would expect it to be.  Unfortunately many do not report and there are the ones who just lie.  I think that is said.  Harvest reporting is the best tool they have.  So when hunters complain who is really at fault.
if used properly it is a great tool. I reported on all my tags and still had a admin fee.  :dunno:. Pisses me off. Donate thousands to them every year and charge me a fee.
Happiness is being in the woods!!!

Offline The scout

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 1242
  • Location: belfair
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2018, 11:24:26 AM »
I reported all my tags in December and then I got charged a fee and there is nothing I can do about it. I hate constantly whining about everything the wdfw does but there constant money grab gets old.  The hunter report thing seems kinda pointless really all they need to know is how many people are hunting in each gmu because they arenít managing game by kill stats they are managing people and money.

Offline Peewee

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2018
  • Posts: 27
  • Location: United States
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2018, 03:14:24 PM »
Same here, i reported n still got charged

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1986
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2018, 03:51:44 PM »
For those that reported and got charged for failure to report.  I suggest you start sending some emails!   Sounds to me that maybe we start requesting a confirmation email or number when reporting.  I doubt it is intentional as some imply.  Maybe a glitch in the system.  I hear a new system is coming.  We should start asking for this feature.  I have to admit the thought of a new system scares me.  Sometimes I am pessimistic and think things can only get worse with change.

I also suggest you find out what you did not report on.  A guy I know thought he reported and found out the clerk at Cabelas sold him a useless tag that he forgot about.  Clerk sold him a damage tag.  He is kind of naive when it comes to Washington so he took the clerks word for it.  He has learned his lesson about listening to Cabelas staff. 

Offline Deerelk37

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 25
  • Location: Auburn
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2018, 10:21:37 AM »
I wouldnít mind a better system for mandatory reporting. My father law said in Wisconsin you had X amount of time to go to a check station to get your animal tagged and a butcher could not accept without such tag. Total number of licenses and amount of kill tags issued would be more accurate than a 10$ fee. The fee only to me shows that on the $ís are cared about, not animal populations.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17883
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2018, 12:22:19 PM »
I wouldnít mind a better system for mandatory reporting. My father law said in Wisconsin you had X amount of time to go to a check station to get your animal tagged and a butcher could not accept without such tag. Total number of licenses and amount of kill tags issued would be more accurate than a 10$ fee. The fee only to me shows that on the $ís are cared about, not animal populations.
That would work for tags that are filled, but I suspect the vast majority of tags that aren't reported are for unfilled or unused tags.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4673
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2018, 02:03:06 PM »
For those that reported and got charged for failure to report.  I suggest you start sending some emails!   Sounds to me that maybe we start requesting a confirmation email or number when reporting.  I doubt it is intentional as some imply.  Maybe a glitch in the system.  I hear a new system is coming.  We should start asking for this feature.  I have to admit the thought of a new system scares me.  Sometimes I am pessimistic and think things can only get worse with change.

I also suggest you find out what you did not report on.  A guy I know thought he reported and found out the clerk at Cabelas sold him a useless tag that he forgot about.  Clerk sold him a damage tag.  He is kind of naive when it comes to Washington so he took the clerks word for it.  He has learned his lesson about listening to Cabelas staff.

You should be getting a confirmation number when you report. I do.
Bruce Vandervort

 

* Recent Topics

Have corn pond complexes affected your 2018 duck season? by Sandberm
[Today at 11:31:40 AM]


WTS Vortex Viper Red Dot by tgray
[Today at 11:25:18 AM]


Washington lieutenant governor skips speech over gun fears by RockChuck
[Today at 11:24:43 AM]


Interesting "Treaty Rights" case in Wyoming by STIKNSTRINGBOW
[Today at 11:18:34 AM]


The KETO thread by KFhunter
[Today at 11:13:37 AM]


Idaho elk hunting near WSU/ palouse zone 8,8A,11A by Henrydog
[Today at 11:06:20 AM]


Chemical Spraying by LDennis24
[Today at 11:03:13 AM]


Winter in effect by Hard2handle
[Today at 10:51:55 AM]


WTB- Electronic Powder dispenser and scale by gallion_t
[Today at 10:23:43 AM]


What is this #3 by throttlejocky20
[Today at 10:06:17 AM]


Need some gear suggestions for 2019 by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 09:51:52 AM]


Stove Jack Installation by Wolfdog2314
[Today at 09:46:35 AM]


where are your favorite GoPro mounting spots by bigbuckdown
[Today at 09:31:42 AM]


Missed cat !!! by Humptulips
[Today at 09:25:34 AM]


Trapping opportunity Gig Harbor area. by Humptulips
[Today at 09:22:50 AM]


Bivy? by HikerHunter
[Today at 08:58:09 AM]


Core 4 Element vest by Hard2handle
[Today at 08:50:08 AM]


My New floater by Blacklab
[Today at 08:40:07 AM]


Liberty Safe for sale by BNAElkhntr
[Today at 08:27:23 AM]


Waterfowl Retriever Training Day - Feb 10th, Monroe, WA by Colin
[Today at 08:25:47 AM]