collapse
Double U Hunting Supply Order Jason Phelps Calls Here

Author Topic: Harvest stats  (Read 1272 times)

Online Stalkin Prey

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2016
  • Posts: 208
Harvest stats
« on: April 19, 2018, 02:13:46 PM »
Been digging into harvest stats trying to figure out my starting point for this season and Iím rather shocked at some of the stats. How accurate do you guys think they are? I know I reported honestly (tag soup) and in the correct units but things arenít quite adding up, I know itís basically an ďhonorĒ system and guys will report false info but how much do you think is actually false? Do you guys take harvest stats into consideration when planning your seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2644
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2018, 02:22:42 PM »
I do!
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline EyeTooth

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 161
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2018, 03:06:24 PM »
Yes

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17178
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2018, 04:07:09 PM »
It's far better information than no information. :twocents:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Stein

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 3156
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2018, 05:21:19 PM »
I do, fair assumption they are relatively similar accuracy across units.  You also have to look for units where a bunch of the harvest happens on private.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline dreamunelk

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1914
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2018, 05:51:34 PM »
It is statistically accurate.  My understanding is hunter reporting is not what you would expect it to be.  Unfortunately many do not report and there are the ones who just lie.  I think that is said.  Harvest reporting is the best tool they have.  So when hunters complain who is really at fault.

Offline elkchaser54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 153
  • Location: Walla Walla
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2018, 10:01:32 AM »
The state just needs to move to a system where in order for your TAG to be valid when punched you must register it online as harvested.  So these numbers are accurate

Offline Oh Mah

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 2640
  • Location: PNW
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2018, 10:11:12 AM »
 :dunno: No internet in a lot of the places people get their harvest's.I would hate for the wdfw to force hunters to carry cell phones.Then it would turn into illegally hunting without internet.

  QUOTE:                                                                                                                   (The state just needs to move to a system where in order for your TAG to be valid when punched you must register it online as harvested.  So these numbers are accurate)
"Boss of the woods"

Offline teanawayslayer

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 2105
  • Location: Eastside
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2018, 10:15:24 AM »
It is statistically accurate.  My understanding is hunter reporting is not what you would expect it to be.  Unfortunately many do not report and there are the ones who just lie.  I think that is said.  Harvest reporting is the best tool they have.  So when hunters complain who is really at fault.
if used properly it is a great tool. I reported on all my tags and still had a admin fee.  :dunno:. Pisses me off. Donate thousands to them every year and charge me a fee.
Happiness is being in the woods!!!

Offline The scout

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 1165
  • Location: belfair
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2018, 11:24:26 AM »
I reported all my tags in December and then I got charged a fee and there is nothing I can do about it. I hate constantly whining about everything the wdfw does but there constant money grab gets old.  The hunter report thing seems kinda pointless really all they need to know is how many people are hunting in each gmu because they arenít managing game by kill stats they are managing people and money.

Offline Peewee

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2018
  • Posts: 14
  • Location: United States
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2018, 03:14:24 PM »
Same here, i reported n still got charged

Offline dreamunelk

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1914
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2018, 03:51:44 PM »
For those that reported and got charged for failure to report.  I suggest you start sending some emails!   Sounds to me that maybe we start requesting a confirmation email or number when reporting.  I doubt it is intentional as some imply.  Maybe a glitch in the system.  I hear a new system is coming.  We should start asking for this feature.  I have to admit the thought of a new system scares me.  Sometimes I am pessimistic and think things can only get worse with change.

I also suggest you find out what you did not report on.  A guy I know thought he reported and found out the clerk at Cabelas sold him a useless tag that he forgot about.  Clerk sold him a damage tag.  He is kind of naive when it comes to Washington so he took the clerks word for it.  He has learned his lesson about listening to Cabelas staff. 

Offline Deerelk37

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 16
  • Location: Auburn
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2018, 10:21:37 AM »
I wouldnít mind a better system for mandatory reporting. My father law said in Wisconsin you had X amount of time to go to a check station to get your animal tagged and a butcher could not accept without such tag. Total number of licenses and amount of kill tags issued would be more accurate than a 10$ fee. The fee only to me shows that on the $ís are cared about, not animal populations.

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17178
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2018, 12:22:19 PM »
I wouldnít mind a better system for mandatory reporting. My father law said in Wisconsin you had X amount of time to go to a check station to get your animal tagged and a butcher could not accept without such tag. Total number of licenses and amount of kill tags issued would be more accurate than a 10$ fee. The fee only to me shows that on the $ís are cared about, not animal populations.
That would work for tags that are filled, but I suspect the vast majority of tags that aren't reported are for unfilled or unused tags.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4295
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2018, 02:03:06 PM »
For those that reported and got charged for failure to report.  I suggest you start sending some emails!   Sounds to me that maybe we start requesting a confirmation email or number when reporting.  I doubt it is intentional as some imply.  Maybe a glitch in the system.  I hear a new system is coming.  We should start asking for this feature.  I have to admit the thought of a new system scares me.  Sometimes I am pessimistic and think things can only get worse with change.

I also suggest you find out what you did not report on.  A guy I know thought he reported and found out the clerk at Cabelas sold him a useless tag that he forgot about.  Clerk sold him a damage tag.  He is kind of naive when it comes to Washington so he took the clerks word for it.  He has learned his lesson about listening to Cabelas staff.

You should be getting a confirmation number when you report. I do.
Bruce Vandervort

 

ElkNut Outdoor Productions

* Recent Topics

WTS/WTT Limbsaver DZ32 $500 by Mongo Hunter
[Today at 08:51:41 AM]


Paul Allen, most influential anti-gun advocate in Washington by timberfaller
[Today at 08:48:49 AM]


SilencerCo. Surpressors by Mongo Hunter
[Today at 08:48:05 AM]


Lion attack in North bend? by pashok23
[Today at 08:47:39 AM]


Machias' 2018 Idaho Bear Season by Machias
[Today at 08:47:03 AM]


What is your car wax of choice? by DOUBLELUNG
[Today at 08:44:42 AM]


Activity in you area by Cab
[Today at 08:30:57 AM]


What brand of truck not to buy by 7mmfan
[Today at 08:10:14 AM]


Looking for a ultrasonic case cleaner by BULLBLASTER
[Today at 08:07:26 AM]


An Interesting Report by Special T
[Today at 07:58:58 AM]


2018 Sheds. Post them here! by Old Man Yager
[Today at 07:56:42 AM]


Good place on the West Side for egr delete and exhaust upgrade? by Mudman
[Today at 07:56:14 AM]


Quality Hunt Wait by 7mmfan
[Today at 07:53:28 AM]


Scope for handgun? by bman940
[Today at 07:48:07 AM]


Idaho OIL by elkslayer069
[Today at 07:38:09 AM]


WTS/WTT Mossberg Sa20 Tactical by Tanners Owner
[Today at 07:33:20 AM]


FS fire pit by erk444
[Today at 07:30:58 AM]


Multiseason/Special Permits by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 06:59:04 AM]


--WTB-- S&W 360 .357 magnum by SERVOSKI
[Today at 06:57:59 AM]


Sherman spring bear by Jonathan_S
[Today at 06:37:30 AM]