collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Harvest stats  (Read 3892 times)

Offline Stalkin Prey

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2016
  • Posts: 229
Harvest stats
« on: April 19, 2018, 02:13:46 PM »
Been digging into harvest stats trying to figure out my starting point for this season and I’m rather shocked at some of the stats. How accurate do you guys think they are? I know I reported honestly (tag soup) and in the correct units but things aren’t quite adding up, I know it’s basically an “honor” system and guys will report false info but how much do you think is actually false? Do you guys take harvest stats into consideration when planning your seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2900
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2018, 02:22:42 PM »
I do!
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline EyeTooth

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 188
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2018, 03:06:24 PM »
Yes

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21761
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2018, 04:07:09 PM »
It's far better information than no information. :twocents:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12998
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2018, 05:21:19 PM »
I do, fair assumption they are relatively similar accuracy across units.  You also have to look for units where a bunch of the harvest happens on private.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2018, 05:51:34 PM »
It is statistically accurate.  My understanding is hunter reporting is not what you would expect it to be.  Unfortunately many do not report and there are the ones who just lie.  I think that is said.  Harvest reporting is the best tool they have.  So when hunters complain who is really at fault.

Offline elkchaser54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 410
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2018, 10:01:32 AM »
The state just needs to move to a system where in order for your TAG to be valid when punched you must register it online as harvested.  So these numbers are accurate

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2018, 10:11:12 AM »
 :dunno: No internet in a lot of the places people get their harvest's.I would hate for the wdfw to force hunters to carry cell phones.Then it would turn into illegally hunting without internet.

  QUOTE:                                                                                                                   (The state just needs to move to a system where in order for your TAG to be valid when punched you must register it online as harvested.  So these numbers are accurate)
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline teanawayslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 4224
  • Location: Eastside
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2018, 10:15:24 AM »
It is statistically accurate.  My understanding is hunter reporting is not what you would expect it to be.  Unfortunately many do not report and there are the ones who just lie.  I think that is said.  Harvest reporting is the best tool they have.  So when hunters complain who is really at fault.
if used properly it is a great tool. I reported on all my tags and still had a admin fee.  :dunno:. Pisses me off. Donate thousands to them every year and charge me a fee.
Happiness is being in the woods!!!

Online The scout

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 1846
  • Location: belfair
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2018, 11:24:26 AM »
I reported all my tags in December and then I got charged a fee and there is nothing I can do about it. I hate constantly whining about everything the wdfw does but there constant money grab gets old.  The hunter report thing seems kinda pointless really all they need to know is how many people are hunting in each gmu because they aren’t managing game by kill stats they are managing people and money.

Offline Peewee

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2018
  • Posts: 47
  • Location: United States
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2018, 03:14:24 PM »
Same here, i reported n still got charged

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2018, 03:51:44 PM »
For those that reported and got charged for failure to report.  I suggest you start sending some emails!   Sounds to me that maybe we start requesting a confirmation email or number when reporting.  I doubt it is intentional as some imply.  Maybe a glitch in the system.  I hear a new system is coming.  We should start asking for this feature.  I have to admit the thought of a new system scares me.  Sometimes I am pessimistic and think things can only get worse with change.

I also suggest you find out what you did not report on.  A guy I know thought he reported and found out the clerk at Cabelas sold him a useless tag that he forgot about.  Clerk sold him a damage tag.  He is kind of naive when it comes to Washington so he took the clerks word for it.  He has learned his lesson about listening to Cabelas staff. 

Offline Deerelk37

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 67
  • Location: Auburn
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2018, 10:21:37 AM »
I wouldn’t mind a better system for mandatory reporting. My father law said in Wisconsin you had X amount of time to go to a check station to get your animal tagged and a butcher could not accept without such tag. Total number of licenses and amount of kill tags issued would be more accurate than a 10$ fee. The fee only to me shows that on the $’s are cared about, not animal populations.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21761
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2018, 12:22:19 PM »
I wouldn’t mind a better system for mandatory reporting. My father law said in Wisconsin you had X amount of time to go to a check station to get your animal tagged and a butcher could not accept without such tag. Total number of licenses and amount of kill tags issued would be more accurate than a 10$ fee. The fee only to me shows that on the $’s are cared about, not animal populations.
That would work for tags that are filled, but I suspect the vast majority of tags that aren't reported are for unfilled or unused tags.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9111
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Harvest stats
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2018, 02:03:06 PM »
For those that reported and got charged for failure to report.  I suggest you start sending some emails!   Sounds to me that maybe we start requesting a confirmation email or number when reporting.  I doubt it is intentional as some imply.  Maybe a glitch in the system.  I hear a new system is coming.  We should start asking for this feature.  I have to admit the thought of a new system scares me.  Sometimes I am pessimistic and think things can only get worse with change.

I also suggest you find out what you did not report on.  A guy I know thought he reported and found out the clerk at Cabelas sold him a useless tag that he forgot about.  Clerk sold him a damage tag.  He is kind of naive when it comes to Washington so he took the clerks word for it.  He has learned his lesson about listening to Cabelas staff.

You should be getting a confirmation number when you report. I do.
Bruce Vandervort

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 07:37:30 PM]


Rem Model 12 will not cycle by wadu1
[Today at 07:32:06 PM]


Air Dryer Cherries by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:10:14 PM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Today at 07:04:08 PM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by huntnphool
[Today at 04:42:10 PM]


8 year old attacked in 2023 ooops by shootnrun
[Today at 04:23:14 PM]


Browning X Bolt sticky stock by JKEEN33
[Today at 01:31:06 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 01:09:43 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by tdot24
[Today at 12:37:30 PM]


2025 Area 9 King Opener by CP
[Today at 11:53:21 AM]


Bonaparte Lake by TeacherMan
[Today at 10:17:00 AM]


Pocket Carry by hookr88
[Today at 09:48:30 AM]


Grouse in Vail? by Alan K
[Today at 09:28:46 AM]


Rabbits looking good so far! by Goshawk
[Today at 09:16:08 AM]


Game scouting in Vail for 2025. Not looking too good so far. by Goshawk
[Today at 09:04:01 AM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by JDArms1240
[Today at 06:12:34 AM]


Good day of steelhead fishing! by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 10:49:23 PM]


Live bait albacore charter by hiway_99
[Yesterday at 07:10:28 PM]


Seeking packer OnCall for early archery unit 328 Naneum/Colockum by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 06:53:06 PM]


Surprise quality deer tag by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 06:01:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal