collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: MT evidence of sex  (Read 4226 times)

Offline ibuyre

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2015
  • Posts: 122
  • Location: Olympia Wa
  • Groups: NRA, SAF
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2020, 09:47:07 PM »
Sounds like they're copying Wyoming regulations.

That's standard in Wy. Talked to a couple game wardens there and they both recommended. Boning out all meat at kill site and proof of sex, and the tail to show if it was a white tail or mule deer in a zip lock with your punched tag. And to keep that zip lock with your boned out meat. I hunted in Wy and then stopped on the way home and hunted a Mt tag and stopped at a couple Mt check stations. I was a little nervous having a pair of antelope and a couple deer in the freezer from WY. With the zip locks, with sex and tail and tag. They just shrugged and "yep, that's the Wyoming way".

I think it's a great system and a great way to do it. Really clean and nice, and easy for a hunter that's packing things out. I mean. Come on really.... someone's going to have a tail and proof of sex from something other than what the meat is from.... The whole prof of sex naturally attached is a PIA and BS for guys that are hunting in the back country, boning out and packing meat. It's something that should be changed. I like how Wy does it. Sounds like Mt and is going that way as well. Sure be nice is Wa did as well.

Offline callturner

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2020
  • Posts: 757
  • Location: nine mile falls Washington
    • n/a
  • Groups: nra
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2020, 10:36:18 PM »
That's evidence of sex, I'm trying to find the requirement for evidence of species.

Subject says evidence of sex!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12977
  • Location: Arlington
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2020, 11:06:55 AM »
I just heard back from a MT Warden, "Currently, there in not a requirement or a burden on the hunter for proof of species. "

Surprised me, but no complaints as that makes my life easier and meat cleaner.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Need information on having a gunsmith thread a barrel for thin walled chokes. by Badhabit
[Today at 02:37:23 PM]


How To Get Your $0.00 Tax Stamp - Black Hammer Arms by dreadi
[Today at 02:34:04 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Ridgerunner
[Today at 01:55:35 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by pickardjw
[Today at 01:39:48 PM]


Quinault Bear guide/help by blackdog
[Today at 01:14:17 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by goosewhacker
[Today at 12:15:01 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by Crunchy
[Today at 11:20:34 AM]


Also looking for help deciding on a scope by jrebel
[Today at 11:09:55 AM]


Gots me a new/old rockchuck rifle coming by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 10:41:07 PM]


Litefighter tent ? by slowwalker
[Yesterday at 10:25:44 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 10:21:31 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by westdcw
[Yesterday at 09:57:25 PM]


6mm Creedmoor Gauges by pickardjw
[Yesterday at 01:27:28 PM]


Brittany breeders by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 01:17:23 PM]


Kings by metlhead
[Yesterday at 12:37:26 PM]


Fullsized Truck Opinion: HiMiNew vs LoMiOlder by rainshadow1
[Yesterday at 11:46:04 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Karl Blanchard
[Yesterday at 10:47:28 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal