collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs  (Read 5480 times)

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5842
  • IBEW 73 (Retired) Burden on the working class.
Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« on: February 18, 2025, 10:09:17 AM »
Local law enforcement can’t use dogs to find bad bears, wolves, cougars under new bill
Feb 18, 2025, 5:10

A wolf roams. A new Washington bill has sparked intense debate among lawmakers, wildlife advocates and local law enforcement.(Photo: Lando Hass/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Share
BY MATT MARKOVICH
KIRO Newsradio Analyst
A new bill before the Washington State Legislature has sparked intense debate among lawmakers, wildlife advocates and local law enforcement.

Senate Bill 5482 seeks to end the use of dogs by local law enforcement to track problematic wildlife — such as bears, cougars and wolves — unless they receive explicit permission from the state.
While some see it as a critical step toward more responsible wildlife management, others argue it could undermine local authorities’ ability to address immediate safety concerns.

The bill, sponsored by State Senator Marko Liias (D-Mukilteo), aims to restrict local agencies from using dogs to hunt these apex predators. Currently, dogs are permitted to track and pursue these animals in certain situations, primarily when public safety or livestock protection is at risk.

However, the bill proposes that local law enforcement, including county sheriffs, be required to consult with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) before initiating any hound hunts for predators like cougars or bears.

Public against hunting with hounds
During a public hearing on the bill, Senator Liias emphasized that public support for limiting hound hunting has existed for decades.

“Initiative 655, passed in 1996 with over 60% of the vote, clearly indicated that voters did not want hound hunting for predators,” Liias said. “Cougars don’t present a significant public safety threat, and killing too many can actually escalate the problem.”


Wildlife advocates are particularly concerned about counties like Klickitat, where hound hunting has been used excessively without proper oversight from WDFW. Sheriff Bob Songer told KIRO Newsradio’s John Curley in an interview that he routinely deploys a volunteer posse to hunt down problematic wildlife.

Rachel Heymon, a Klickitat County resident, testified that frequent hound hunts in her area have disrupted local ecosystems.

“There have been over 154 county hound hunts in five years, often involving armed posse hunters chasing wildlife that pose no threat,” Heymon said. “These hunts scare people, disrupt ecosystems, and endanger public safety. Expertise from trained wildlife personnel is needed.”

More on MyNW: Washington considers taking over grizzly bear management — But not everyone’s on board

Critics say bill hurts public safety
Critics of the bill argue that local law enforcement officers, particularly county sheriffs, have a better understanding of their communities and can respond faster to predator threats.

“Public safety is absolutely the sheriff’s number one duty,” Brad Manke, elected Stevens County Sheriff, said. “If we lose the ability to act quickly in these situations, it could lead to more dangerous encounters between humans and wildlife.”

Supporters of the bill, including environmental organizations like Friends of the White Salmon River, argue the current system allows too much unregulated and reckless action.

“Some county-initiated hunts aren’t constrained by any guidelines on the age, sex, or health of the animals,” Pat Arnold, the group’s executive director, said. “This is disruptive to cougar populations and can lead to unintended consequences, such as increasing conflict with humans.”

Supporters also argue that allowing untrained volunteers to hunt with hounds only increases risks.

“County officers don’t have the necessary training to make these decisions,” Arnold said. “We need to leave wildlife management to the professionals at WDFW.”

Another key argument in favor of the bill is that the science behind predator management shows that removing too many adult cougars can actually increase conflicts.

Second chances with strings attached: DUI record vacation bill clears key hurdle in Washington

Killing cougars disrupts healthy ecosystem
Josh Rosenau, Director of Policy and Advocacy for the Mountain Lion Foundation, explained, “Killing mature cougars destabilizes populations, leading to more inexperienced, conflict-prone animals. Cougars are vital to controlling chronic wasting disease in deer and maintaining a healthy ecosystem.”

The bill does not remove the ability of county agencies to respond to emergencies. Instead, it requires them to coordinate with the state to ensure wildlife management decisions are based on scientific research and expertise.

“We want to ensure that the state’s wildlife management goals are applied statewide, not just county by county,” Rosenau said.

Not everyone is convinced. Richard Eich, a longtime hound hunter in Ferry County, argued that taking away local control will only harm rural communities.

“I’ve worked with the DFW for years,” Eich said. “We need the ability to react quickly, and if you take away local control, it will only harm our communities. People will go back to handling these issues themselves, without calling authorities.”

Senate Bill 5482 had its first hearing on Monday. The committee must take a final vote on the bill by Friday; otherwise, it is most likely dead for this legislative session.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19447
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2025, 10:36:56 AM »
Gotta love democrats!! 
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2232
  • Location: Selah
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2025, 11:31:50 AM »
Ridiculous. It's never enough is it?

Add it to the list, here's a link to the bill for comment

https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5482&Initiative=false&Year=2025

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16001
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2025, 06:41:13 PM »
This proposed bill is just plain stupid. Not having the ability to immediately dispatch a problem cougars, bears or wolves in a timely manner is ridiculous. Who padded the pocket book of this proposed law!!
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4458
  • Location: Wet side
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2025, 07:06:15 PM »
This proposed bill is just plain stupid. Not having the ability to immediately dispatch a problem cougars, bears or wolves in a timely manner is ridiculous. Who padded the pocket book of this proposed law!!
:yeah:

Offline MADMAX

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 9087
  • Location: Kitsap
  • I like big bucks and I can not lie
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2025, 07:18:13 PM »
Thank you for posting
 :tup:
Damm fools in Olympia
Comments sent
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Mark Twain


I Ain't Captain Walker.
I'm The Guy Who Carries Mr. Dead In His Pocket


What would life be without the thrill of the hunt ?

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6055
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2025, 07:48:33 PM »
Ridiculous. It's never enough is it?

Add it to the list, here's a link to the bill for comment

https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5482&Initiative=false&Year=2025

Done! :yeah:
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline Oldguy

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 693
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2025, 09:51:43 PM »
Message sent. Is the best the politicians can come up with during the time they are hard at work in Olympia?
« Last Edit: February 22, 2025, 05:28:54 PM by Oldguy »

Offline EnglishSetter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2024
  • Posts: 234
  • Location: Winlock
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2025, 10:51:34 PM »
I liked this:

Quote
   “County officers don’t have the necessary training to make these decisions,” Arnold said. “We need to leave wildlife management to the professionals at WDFW.”

All for "the science" until they aren't. 

Curious WDFW's position.  Supporters submit WDFW as the experts.  But all I see are references to "studies/research" without actually listing any of these "studies/research".  That typically smells like bovine excrement.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2025, 11:57:40 PM by EnglishSetter »

Offline Ghost Hunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5372
  • Location: SW <-> NE
  • Groups: NRA Patron Life Member, RMEF Life, Sponser Member
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2025, 11:36:41 PM »
Comment to my reps.  "Enough is enough. This is a bad bill that hamstrings local authorities from doing their job protecting the citizens in their jurisdictions. Predators are losing the fear of humans. Let's protect people, their families and livelihoods that pay the wages of the politicians coming forward with these ludicrous bills."
Economy failure = Too many people spending money they don't have on things they don't need to impress people they don't like.

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4045
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2025, 08:53:51 AM »
Ya can't fix stupid, especially if it wears a D!!!   
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline KNOPHISH

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 1545
  • Location: Auburn
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2025, 09:01:38 AM »
Hurting the cougar population and ecosystem is moon bat crazy talk.
I have Man Chit to do

Offline Cougartail

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 3520
  • Location: Eastern Washington
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2025, 09:22:58 AM »
Men with tampons and women who are strapped push this garbage as an "in your face" tactic against normal people.

Who else would dream this bs up?
If I need a permit and education to buy a firearm than women should need a permit and education  before getting an abortion.

Voting for Democrats is prima facie evidence you are a skirt wearing, low T, beta male. Do better.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50443
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2025, 09:33:13 AM »
MORE STUPIDITY

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5842
  • IBEW 73 (Retired) Burden on the working class.
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2025, 09:43:01 AM »
Men with tampons and women who are strapped push this garbage as an "in your face" tactic against normal people.

Who else would dream this bs up?


Amazing that the Rhodes Scholars that come up with this stuff all have a "D" someplace in the title and hail from the land west of the Pacific Crest trail.

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6055
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2025, 09:50:37 AM »
Men with tampons and women who are strapped push this garbage as an "in your face" tactic against normal people.

Who else would dream this bs up?


Amazing that the Rhodes Scholars that come up with this stuff all have a "D" someplace in the title and hail from the land west of the Pacific Crest trail.

 :yeah:
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline Smokeploe

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 253
  • Location: Ethel
  • Groups: FTE, shooterforum
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2025, 11:25:08 AM »
I think it is time to start using the dogs/hounds on the predators in Olympia!


Smokeploe
Smokeploe

When guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have guns!
The same with ammo!
The same with personal liberties

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4458
  • Location: Wet side
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2025, 12:08:17 PM »
Anytime there is a nuisance animals that need to be caught they’re deferred to the WCO list to hire people like me to actually be able to catch the nuisance and help the people out as 99% of the staff including the wardens have zero training or idea how to catch let’s say coyotes that are killing cats and dogs so why would they have WDFW run dogs ? I say let the professional hound handlers and trappers take care of the situation swiftly and efficiently

Offline GWP

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1729
  • Location: Big Sandy-By Westport
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2025, 12:28:38 PM »
I tried to stay away from this thread. I really did!
I have commented about hound hunting (though I have never done it) and the stupidity of having the general public voting on something they know virtually nothing about, but it seems that the Western side of the State 'leadership', if you can call it that, is going the same direction.
Is it any wonder the State wants to split up? They could care less about any one but the small city area population that carries the votes to do what they want to do. It is soooooo sad how bad it has gotten in Washington. Living here for the vast majority of my life I will say it was not always like this!
Cuterebra are NOT cute!

Offline duckmen1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2544
  • Location: outdoors
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2025, 12:53:35 PM »
If you are a D!!! Please don’t marry a D!!! Because your kids will be………….Deet  da Dee!!!
Maturity is when you have the power to destroy someone who did you wrong but instead you breathe, walk away, and let life take care of them.

Offline teanawayslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 4185
  • Location: Eastside
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2025, 01:08:24 PM »
Simone needs to drop off one of each in dudes back yard. Maybe they will kill his dog cat or even a loved one. Then see how that prick feels about the use of hounds!
Happiness is being in the woods!!!

Offline L8NITE

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 486
  • Location: Olympic Peninsula
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2025, 03:37:14 PM »
I knew by the title I should not have opened this but i did it anyway and as figured my blood pressure went up. It is getting so hard to take this non sense anymore. where do these people come up with this BS!!!

   “County officers don’t have the necessary training to make these decisions,” Arnold said. “We need to leave wildlife management to the professionals at WDFW.”

Well if this is so true than why aren't they leaving law enforcement decisions up to law enforcement that have the TRAINING and not these Monday morning quarterbacks who make bad decisions :bash: :bash:
"The Hunts not over!"

Offline Bucks2Ducks

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 613
  • Location: Skagit
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2025, 04:01:45 PM »
So we can trust Local law enforcement with making decisions on people, but on predators is where we draw the line?
When the buffalo are gone we will hunt mice, for we are hunters and we want our freedom-Sitting Bull

Offline teanawayslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 4185
  • Location: Eastside
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2025, 04:32:05 PM »
And in most cases law enforcement consults with fish and wildlife and there usually the ones to make the phone calls to the houndsman.
Happiness is being in the woods!!!

Offline Moose Master

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 2592
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #24 on: February 19, 2025, 08:46:38 PM »
Thanks for posting this.  I will send comments off

Offline EnglishSetter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2024
  • Posts: 234
  • Location: Winlock
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #25 on: February 19, 2025, 09:51:39 PM »
And in most cases law enforcement consults with fish and wildlife and there usually the ones to make the phone calls to the houndsman.

I was thinking "this isn't done in a vacuum".  DFW isn't ignorant of the process. 

It should be DFW's call.  Legislature has no business in this unless DFW requests it.

Offline Fidelk

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2016
  • Posts: 5761
  • Location: Sequim, WA
  • Groups: NRA, JCSA
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #26 on: February 20, 2025, 10:51:28 AM »
My two Belgian Malinois guard dogs are emotional support animals, which are exempt from these childish rules.

Offline avidnwoutdoorsman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2019
  • Posts: 393
  • Location: Northwest
  • Groups: NWTF, PF, TU, DU, BCWF, NRA, BCH&A
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #27 on: February 20, 2025, 08:00:12 PM »
I watched the committee hearing there is a link on the bill.

It’s worth it.

Like we all need to be present at the commission meetings it’s time we are present at these committee meetings too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Keep Calm Gobble On

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9075
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2025, 10:39:00 AM »
And in most cases law enforcement consults with fish and wildlife and there usually the ones to make the phone calls to the houndsman.

I was thinking "this isn't done in a vacuum".  DFW isn't ignorant of the process. 

It should be DFW's call.  Legislature has no business in this unless DFW requests it.

I'm thinking this Bill is not exactly agency request legislation, but DFW wants this. It all stems from Klickitat County responding to constituent complaints when DFW either wouldn't or was slow in responding. The cougar people in DFW don't like being cut out of the loop. This is designed to show those local yokels who's boss.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3857
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #29 on: February 22, 2025, 11:12:04 AM »
How can we stop the morons!? Wtf is the point of this?
Go hawks

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9075
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #30 on: February 22, 2025, 12:49:28 PM »
How can we stop the morons!? Wtf is the point of this?
Send a comment on this Bill
https://app.leg.wa.gov/BillSummary/?BillNumber=5482&Year=2025&Initiative=false
Go to the link, upper right of Bill at a glance window
Bruce Vandervort

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38357
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #31 on: February 22, 2025, 03:43:48 PM »
 :yeah:

comment sent, thanks for the link
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3857
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #32 on: February 22, 2025, 05:10:47 PM »
Oh I did, I feel like all I do anymore is send comments on ridiculous bills!!!
Go hawks

Offline MADMAX

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 9087
  • Location: Kitsap
  • I like big bucks and I can not lie
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #33 on: February 22, 2025, 08:48:47 PM »
Oh I did, I feel like all I do anymore is send comments on ridiculous bills!!!

I bet I’ve done 50
Or seems so 🤣
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Mark Twain


I Ain't Captain Walker.
I'm The Guy Who Carries Mr. Dead In His Pocket


What would life be without the thrill of the hunt ?

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38357
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #34 on: February 22, 2025, 09:08:51 PM »
I got an email tonight saying this attempt has failed again.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50443
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Local law enforcement can’t use dogs
« Reply #35 on: February 23, 2025, 04:49:29 AM »
👎🏼 I’m glad

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Montana 2025 by Threewolves
[Today at 08:57:36 AM]


Patterning & cam data by hunter399
[Today at 08:52:01 AM]


Public comment periods open for Washington hunting season, wildlife feeding prop by hunter399
[Today at 08:34:18 AM]


Ground blind for blacktail by kodiak06
[Today at 07:36:10 AM]


Flying with a bow to RSA by D-Rock425
[Today at 07:13:05 AM]


A couple CZ/BRNO rescues that turned out pretty nice by JDHasty
[Today at 07:05:09 AM]


WA wilderness's Modern .... by Coulee
[Today at 03:36:57 AM]


NE Washington double beard by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:49:24 PM]


Wall Tents Tips and Tricks by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 06:49:43 PM]


New to Mule deer hunting where to start by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 06:06:51 PM]


youth turkey hunter keepsake? by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 02:51:52 PM]


Trask or wilson river guide? by Irish_hunter93
[Yesterday at 09:45:39 AM]


Springers by treeclimber2852
[Yesterday at 07:27:45 AM]


Carbon Bows by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 06:46:17 AM]


A “parts gun” that morphed into a restoration project that may be of interest by JDHasty
[April 25, 2025, 11:56:30 PM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by dreadi
[April 25, 2025, 11:25:35 PM]


Slate Autos EV PU by follow maggie
[April 25, 2025, 08:50:27 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal