collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Heading to Cabelas Sunday as I am ready to make another purchase (<$500) to carry with me on my high hunt.  I have good scope & binos.  I am comfortable shooting up to 400 yards.  What would be your next purchase?  

Rangefinder
15 (57.7%)
Spotting Scope
11 (42.3%)

Total Members Voted: 26

Voting closed: October 14, 2012, 07:02:25 AM

Author Topic: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope  (Read 14237 times)

Offline losdaddy7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 512
  • Location: Snohomish
  • Groups: losdaddy7
Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« on: September 14, 2012, 07:02:25 AM »
Any comments or rationale? 

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2012, 07:38:08 AM »
 I picked scope but am torn. You should have a general idea with the use of any standard duplex reticle what  is in your range and what is not when sporting a modern rifle.

I picked spotting scope because it is far more effective to hunt with your eyes and not with your legs. Especially on a high hunt. The majority of my rifle kills start this way, high hunt or not. Find a tall peak with a sharp drop, glass buck until he beds, go kill him. You'll be amazed at all you've been missing.

Torn because $500 or less usually buys you crap on the spotting scope world. Sure you can get into respectable binos in that price range, but thee spotters higher magnification will also amplify cheap glass' distortion, color fringing, chromatic aberration, etc. I would be prepared to drop $1,000+. Buy once, cry once. You'll get far more people on here telling you they wish they would have nutted up the first time with quality glass rather than people who will tell you that they're glad they only spent $399 on a spotter and have used it on many successful hunts.

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2012, 07:44:49 AM »
Are you riding horses in or backpacking? If the latter then weight and space will be a concern. I would consider a compact, yet high quality spotter, such as the Leupold Golden Ring HD 12-40x60 or something like it. I'd probably also go with a monopod for that setup instead if a tripod.

Offline losdaddy7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 512
  • Location: Snohomish
  • Groups: losdaddy7
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2012, 07:46:52 AM »
Backpacking.... 

If I were to drop $1000 on a good scope, any other suggestions on models/brand?  I may go shopping this weekend..

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2012, 07:56:51 AM »
 don't forget to budget for your tripod/monopod! I spent $300 on mine (Manfrotto), though I did upgrade the head to a nicer model (Bogen 701rc2) that would support  the weight of an 80mm scope.+ DSLR for digiscoping.

Truth be told, I've never digiscoped in all the many years I've owned it, but a nice, fluid  head than pans (turns) smoothly is great to have for making minute adjustments and glassing all day long.

Offline jrod1407

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 38
  • Location: Elk Plain
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2012, 07:59:28 AM »
ok i choose range-finder with out a doubt!!! first day of opening season in the first hour in fact. i called in a 6x6 MASSIVE BULL to about 35 yards and MISSED (overshot). 3 hours later i was at bob's sporting goods browsing the selection. then 5 days later i got a second shot and because i knew the exact distance (down to a half of a yard) i was able to stick a nice 4x2 with a double lung shot.  range-finder is mandatory.... for anyseason
When you stick'em right, there is no blood trail, only a  puddle.

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2012, 08:06:29 AM »
The Nikon ED 50mm Fieldscope (NOT the Prostaff model) and Pentax PF-ED2 65mm are two models that I considered a few years ago when I considered a more compact  scope. I like the wrap around focus ring found on the Nikon, Swaro, etc myself over the finger knob found on some other brands--YMMV as this is purely preference. Since the two I mentioned are a few years on the market, there should be a few on the cheap used.

Go with HD/ED/APO/etc glass from one of the reputable manufacturers and you'll be good to go.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21733
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2012, 08:12:15 AM »
I would choose a rangefinder over a spotting scope. Knowing how far away an animal is can make the difference between a hit, a miss, or a cripple, or passing a shot that could have been made because you thought it was too far. Binoculars are essential but a spotting scope would be third on my list after a rangefinder.

Also, if you plan to get a spotting scope you'll really want to budget and not go cheap.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2012, 08:24:28 AM »
I would choose a rangefinder over a spotting scope. Knowing how far away an animal is can make the difference between a hit, a miss, or a cripple, or passing a shot that could have been made because you thought it was too far. Binoculars are essential but a spotting scope would be third on my list after a rangefinder.

Also, if you plan to get a spotting scope you'll really want to budget and not go cheap.

Yup, word for word on what I was gonna say.

Offline Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5909
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
  • Groups: blacktail sniper
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #9 on: September 14, 2012, 05:40:36 PM »
I would choose a rangefinder over a spotting scope. Knowing how far away an animal is can make the difference between a hit, a miss, or a cripple, or passing a shot that could have been made because you thought it was too far. Binoculars are essential but a spotting scope would be third on my list after a rangefinder.

Also, if you plan to get a spotting scope you'll really want to budget and not go cheap.

Yup, word for word on what I was gonna say.
:yeah:
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline Hilltop123

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 2095
  • Location: Up on the Ump
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #10 on: September 14, 2012, 06:13:13 PM »
Just my  :twocents:.............. I didn't offer, YOU ASKED................Most modern, high velocity rounds will do 400 yds. easy enough,  just sight in 2-3 inches high at a hundred, takes some of the guess work out...and if you look at alot of deer, through your scope and practice at those ranges, you know your limits......Now are you hunting west or east side?  If eastside is your regular hunting grounds.........then get the spotting scope..........I have watch way to many folks, looking a bucks with bino's, GUESSING that it's a 3 point.....I put my spotter on it and it's just a big 2.......but the opposite can happen also........guys looking at smaller bucks....and walk off leaving a legal 3 standing......the spotter can also save alot of boot leather on stalks also, it sucks to put miles and time into a stalk and only have it turn out to be a 2 point.........and yes I own a range finder, a Lieca 800........but if I had to leave one at home....hands down the the range finder will be left....the spotter will always have a spot in my pack :twocents:

Offline losdaddy7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 512
  • Location: Snohomish
  • Groups: losdaddy7
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2012, 08:03:57 AM »
With my limited comfortable range, and more time hunting Eastern Wa terrain, I think Ill go for the spotter.  Now to figure out which one... :)

Offline royalbull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 498
  • Location: ENUMCLAW
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2012, 08:43:39 AM »
I think I would need more than $500

Offline losdaddy7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 512
  • Location: Snohomish
  • Groups: losdaddy7
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2012, 02:08:23 PM »
Well....just finished my shopping trip at Cabelas and decided to purchase the best deal I could, the best quality sale item.....  I bought the Leica crf1600 rangefinder.  :IBCOOL: Cabelas is closing them out and I bought the last one in stock for $150 off....  woohoo...   I checked out the spotting scopes and have my eye on the Vortex Viper HD....  just need to wait for a good  price.


Offline Maligator

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 680
  • Location: Snohomish County
Re: Rangefinder or Spotting Scope
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2012, 02:52:49 PM »
I chose rangefinder because I already have a great set of Zen-Ray binos that I take with me and my concern is with having an accurate distance for proper bullet placement. Now don't get me wrong; I still need a good spotting scope and will end up getting one, but just ordered a Vortex 1000 rangefinder today. Waiting for it to arrive in 3-5 days!
NAHC Life Member

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Last year putting in… by wa.hunter
[Yesterday at 11:02:00 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:34:36 PM]


Resetting dash warning lights by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 09:57:43 PM]


alkali elk special hunt by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 09:17:12 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by Ghost Hunter
[Yesterday at 08:56:09 PM]


Oregon Seed #'s by Brute
[Yesterday at 08:54:20 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 08:38:50 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by baldopepper
[Yesterday at 08:08:06 PM]


The time clock has started.....and go. by KNOPHISH
[Yesterday at 07:31:05 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 07:23:55 PM]


Colorado Results by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 02:29:43 PM]


Burrowing Animal by b0bbyg
[Yesterday at 12:43:47 PM]


Cold bore or fouled barrel. by hunter399
[Yesterday at 12:36:22 PM]


DIY Ucluelet trip by CP
[Yesterday at 05:48:15 AM]


Oregon spring bear by time2hunt
[May 27, 2025, 08:03:28 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by hunter399
[May 27, 2025, 04:38:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal