collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?  (Read 24714 times)

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19135
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #45 on: December 12, 2012, 02:45:28 PM »
nooksack
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline skywalker253

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 303
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #46 on: December 12, 2012, 02:53:55 PM »
nooksack

I have been up there a few times on I5, but I have never ventured off deep in the GMU. Looked pretty steep from the main hwy. How open is it to the public? Any pics of some big bulls you can post? Get us excited!

Offline 270Flat

  • Chief
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 880
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • Getting skunked beats doing yard work!
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #47 on: December 12, 2012, 02:57:37 PM »
FYI Blues are STEEP too!! I saw a couple real bruisers this year with a spike tag in my pocket.
fear no fish!!

Offline skywalker253

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 303
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #48 on: December 12, 2012, 03:16:55 PM »
FYI Blues are STEEP too!! I saw a couple real bruisers this year with a spike tag in my pocket.

Yes...I have hunted deer there for over 25 years. It can be a real dangerous in there. I suggest hiring Dave at Western Outfitters for an trophy bull hunt. I won't hunt elk there to shoot a spike. I have always hunted the westside for elk, but considering the number of points I have.........I GOING EAST!!!

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8823
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #49 on: December 13, 2012, 06:33:59 AM »
The reallty is the blues have more big bulls , but the country is steep and deep . there's some good bulls in the cloc , teannaway and peaches , chuck bumping in for fun. the central units can produce bulls in the 370-380 range with some hard work and sure there's a couple that push 400 but i've yet to see them . So it really depends how far one wants to travell and how good of shape your in . I'm gonna play a ace this year and hope for a draw .

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19135
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #50 on: December 13, 2012, 08:13:11 AM »
nooksack

I have been up there a few times on I5, but I have never ventured off deep in the GMU. Looked pretty steep from the main hwy. How open is it to the public? Any pics of some big bulls you can post? Get us excited!

The herd west of Birdsview had a monster bull in it this year, plus the one just east of Sedro Wolley had a nice one as well.
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12163
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #51 on: December 13, 2012, 08:33:03 AM »
The reallty is the blues have more big bulls , but the country is steep and deep . there's some good bulls in the cloc , teannaway and peaches , chuck bumping in for fun. the central units can produce bulls in the 370-380 range with some hard work and sure there's a couple that push 400 but i've yet to see them . So it really depends how far one wants to travell and how good of shape your in . I'm gonna play a ace this year and hope for a draw .
Dude, what did I ever do to you?  :bash:  :chuckle:
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline Roperfive88

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 337
  • Location: Eastern Washington
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #52 on: December 13, 2012, 03:27:13 PM »
Arizona or New Mexico. Lots of big bulls :chuckle:

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8823
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #53 on: December 15, 2012, 08:05:38 PM »
Don't wory woodchuck most guys wont do what it takes to kil a big bull and only a hanfull just happen on one .

Offline BOWHUNTER45

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 14731

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #55 on: December 15, 2012, 08:21:09 PM »
Here is one from the Clock that KNOPISH posted. 400+
Those are reproduction antlers.  I know the taxidermist in Shelton who made them and did the mount.  He is a horrible taxidermist by the way.

Offline BOWHUNTER45

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 14731
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #56 on: December 15, 2012, 08:23:43 PM »
Man I think thats the way I need to hunt ...Just order me up some of those repos and hunt from my house ... :yeah:

Offline BOWHUNTER45

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 14731
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #57 on: December 15, 2012, 08:26:31 PM »
nooksack

I have been up there a few times on I5, but I have never ventured off deep in the GMU. Looked pretty steep from the main hwy. How open is it to the public? Any pics of some big bulls you can post? Get us excited!
all the bulls in that unit are now spikes  :yeah:

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19932
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #58 on: December 15, 2012, 08:36:58 PM »
I hope your not expecting to draw just because you have 17 points, I quit expecting a few years ago and I also have 17 points now.  If you have have never killed a bull you should do yourself a favor and put in for the rifle 300 units, your odds of drawing are much better and there are a few guys on here that will help with your hunt. You only get 2 choices for quality elk, I would do what someone already suggested on here, put in for a tough draw like the blues then put in for one of the 300 units for your second choice. Good luck on what ever you do, and don't count on anything when it comes to drawing in this state. When I had 15 points I applied for a quality hunt that had 3 permits, the three tags went to guys with 6, 4, and 2 points. It could be another 5 years before we draw or more.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline nwhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 1179
  • nwhunter
Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
« Reply #59 on: December 15, 2012, 08:53:58 PM »
Or you could split your points with someone who has a history of being real lucky in the draws and go hunting! :chuckle: nwhunter

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by jrebel
[Today at 11:31:24 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by muleyslayer
[Today at 11:01:39 AM]


Cougar and an elk same pic/video by Crunchy
[Today at 10:56:38 AM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by Twispriver
[Today at 10:15:23 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by 2MANY
[Today at 09:00:29 AM]


Big buck, bad eye by 2MANY
[Today at 08:59:17 AM]


CITES hide sealer and Fur Harvesters Receiving Agent info Pt 1 by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:35:28 AM]


Color phase fox by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:32:56 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:19:02 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:18:03 AM]


re-barreling a gun by Wingin it
[Today at 06:52:34 AM]


Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by Wingin it
[Today at 06:45:11 AM]


Possible record bull? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:44:10 AM]


Entiat Modern hunting by vandeman17
[Today at 06:42:15 AM]


My new BB Gun by FlyFish360
[Today at 03:09:02 AM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by Berner5
[Yesterday at 09:18:43 PM]


Research Request - Deer, Moose & Elk Samples by cjc23
[Yesterday at 09:09:08 PM]


We lost one of our own (Colockumelk) by cem3434
[Yesterday at 08:46:12 PM]


Found tripod by royalbull
[Yesterday at 06:49:42 PM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by bb76
[Yesterday at 06:10:17 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal