collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: wolf biology 101  (Read 6884 times)

Offline waterdoctor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: The Wedge
wolf biology 101
« on: January 19, 2013, 09:45:35 AM »
I have taken my time sense joining here and thought that it was time to start a new topic.  First off we have had a place in the wedge for going on three years.  Also I about to finish out my commitment out of state and will be living full time at our place.  I have degree in zoologist and have tried to work will the Colville staff, Jay, Dana and Paul on the wolves around our place. 

Based on the reports here I have mapped out the probable wolf packs in the state.  I think that we have at least 15 packs in the state now in all three management areas.   The problem is the staffing the Fish and Wildlife has and the documentation required to confirm a breeding pack.  The reports that are submitted to F&W do not as a rule have the detail they need to spend resources on locating a pack.  I know because it was a chore getting Paul up to trap and document the wedge pack. 

When I get back home if anyone wants to learn how to properly bag and tag wolf scat for DNA testing I will be glad to help.  Also on how to get pictures of wolf tracks with the detail that the F&W needs.  The biggest thing we can do to get the wolves de-listed is to get pictures from trail cams that have wolf pups in them.  If you have these and have all the right supporting documentation then they can move forward with saying that it is a breeding pack. 

I am going to try and get F&W to sign off on me giving this training so that the higher ups will accept our information.  And no I am not going to look for any money on the deal but if you bring a six pack I will have one or three. 

As has been mentioned here wolves can sustain a 40 to 50 percent yearly mortality and maintain their numbers.  The biggest mortality cause for wolves is interaction with other wolf packs.  Until there numbers are high enough for packs home ranges to butt up next to each other they will  increase in numbers and form additional packs.  Parvo, mange and distemper are the big hitters as is the wolves killing each other in fights.  The other thing is the wolves running out of prey animals to eat. 

Looking at the numbers of elk killed per year by a wolf that was presented in the meeting this week a person can figure out pretty easy how long it will take the wolves in a pack to wipe out the herds in their range.  The easiest way is to look at the AMU's that the area can support.  Figure one AMU per elk and you will have a pretty good idea on how many elk the area can hold.  It is not perfect but it will get you within 20% plus or minus.  I think that this is why the wedge pack turned to cattle.  To many wolves and not enough game. 

The biologist stated that we were going to see an exponential increase in wolves this next year.  I had done some figuring and I came up with an additional 32 to 48 wolves this next year.  That is going to hit the elk herds bad on the east side. 

There is two real good ways of knowing if you have an active pack in the area.  One you hear the wolves howling.  The next is if you have coyote packs that generally do a lot of howling and they stop.  Around our place I know the wolves are around if the coyotes stop making noise.   If it is just a lone wolf or a pair they do not seem to impact the coyotes but a pack puts the fear of god into them. 

I have not at this time got a good reply to what makes a wolf a hybrid.  I had one coming on the place that I was sure was a hybrid based on it's behavior.  I told Dana and Jay that I thought it was a hybrid and then they got interested in finding out about it.  Even had Jay at my place a time or two.  The key is to be able to talk the talk that the biologists use.  Also if you start off with "I saw a hybrid can I shoot it?"  You have taken the high ground from them.  If they say no then you ask when are you coming out to check it out.  If they say yes, pull out your note book write it down and ask if they will sign it.  This puts more pressure on them to check out good sightings.  However refrain from reporting bad sightings.  This wastes their time and makes it harder for the next guy with a good report to get taken seriously. 

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2013, 10:18:58 AM »
5 black wolves were spotted near deep lake boundary road a few miles east of Northport WA chasing a few Elk yesterday- this from a person I know and trust but there is no evidence other than hearsay.


I'd like to visit with you and learn this bag n tag of scat,  I did take some pictures earlier this winter from wolves right near the McIrvins summer grazing lands. 

I think the cattle will be hit hard again this year, for sure!





« Last Edit: January 19, 2013, 10:32:05 AM by KFhunter »

Offline waterdoctor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: The Wedge
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2013, 10:35:19 AM »
I will be up to the house the end of March.  Then again in April.  Keep in touch and we will try to meet up. 

As to the cattle getting hit we will see.  During rifle season I did not see much elk sign.  Cow / calf track and one place where one was headed into the dark timber.  I am not the best elk hunter but I have fun. 

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2013, 10:43:47 AM »
The State will remain pessimistic in order to stay their course of not ever wanting to delist, and NEVER allow hunting. 

And to think WDFW sold their elk meeting as  a way to create more opportunity for hunters because  they asked for a better elk experience in the n.e. .... when in actuallity it amounts to an extra handfull of cows/calves for the wolves.

What needs to happen is all those people who signed petitions supporting wolves, and those groups that support them, need to foot the bill for wolf management in its entirety.  Stop taking our monies for wolves, and make those who desire them pay for them.  Sell them wolf permits @ 40$ each, and then send overages, like cattle bills and helicopter bills to the pro wolf conservation groups.  Its time they pay for their impact on WDFW, and its time our deer/elk/bear/turkey/moose and what have you dollars stop funding wolves.

Fair is fair.......they are getting their cake at our expense,.

Offline mfswallace

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 2653
  • Location: where I be
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2013, 10:45:14 AM »
Thanks for the beta! Sure would b nice to have this and maybe some other presentations/activities/learning opportunities happen at the spring Hunt-WA get together???

KF, it's nice to see we can disagree on something's but respect each other's passion as hunters/outdoorsmen to find some common ground.

Offline waterdoctor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: The Wedge
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2013, 10:58:54 AM »
The State will remain pessimistic in order to stay their course of not ever wanting to delist, and NEVER allow hunting. 

And to think WDFW sold their elk meeting as  a way to create more opportunity for hunters because  they asked for a better elk experience in the n.e. .... when in actuallity it amounts to an extra handfull of cows/calves for the wolves.

What needs to happen is all those people who signed petitions supporting wolves, and those groups that support them, need to foot the bill for wolf management in its entirety.  Stop taking our monies for wolves, and make those who desire them pay for them.  Sell them wolf permits @ 40$ each, and then send overages, like cattle bills and helicopter bills to the pro wolf conservation groups.  Its time they pay for their impact on WDFW, and its time our deer/elk/bear/turkey/moose and what have you dollars stop funding wolves.

Fair is fair.......they are getting their cake at our expense,.

What I am thinking is to have go solid documentation that shows the packs have reached the goal in the management plan.   At that point people with skin in the game will have ammo to taken them to court to get the de-listing. 

As to the WL's paying their share that will be an uphill battle. 

The way to attack the wolf problem is two fold IMO.  One is documentation of the packs and get them de-listed. The other is that the wolf management plan did not deal well with the impact of the wolves on other endangered predators.  The highest profile one is the Grizzlies.  There were four of them that fish and wildlife were watching up in the wedge this summer.   A boar a sow and two cubs.  I do not know if this had an impact on the removal of the wedge pack behind the curtain our not.  However a suit or petition  to de-list in the east part of the state due to impact on the Grizzlies might just work. 

Offline waterdoctor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: The Wedge
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2013, 11:00:11 AM »
Thanks for the beta! Sure would b nice to have this and maybe some other presentations/activities/learning opportunities happen at the spring Hunt-WA get together???

KF, it's nice to see we can disagree on something's but respect each other's passion as hunters/outdoorsmen to find some common ground.

When is the spring get together? 

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2013, 11:20:23 AM »
The State will remain pessimistic in order to stay their course of not ever wanting to delist, and NEVER allow hunting. 

And to think WDFW sold their elk meeting as  a way to create more opportunity for hunters because  they asked for a better elk experience in the n.e. .... when in actuallity it amounts to an extra handfull of cows/calves for the wolves.

What needs to happen is all those people who signed petitions supporting wolves, and those groups that support them, need to foot the bill for wolf management in its entirety.  Stop taking our monies for wolves, and make those who desire them pay for them.  Sell them wolf permits @ 40$ each, and then send overages, like cattle bills and helicopter bills to the pro wolf conservation groups.  Its time they pay for their impact on WDFW, and its time our deer/elk/bear/turkey/moose and what have you dollars stop funding wolves.

Fair is fair.......they are getting their cake at our expense,.

What I am thinking is to have go solid documentation that shows the packs have reached the goal in the management plan.   At that point people with skin in the game will have ammo to taken them to court to get the de-listing. 

As to the WL's paying their share that will be an uphill battle. 

The way to attack the wolf problem is two fold IMO.  One is documentation of the packs and get them de-listed. The other is that the wolf management plan did not deal well with the impact of the wolves on other endangered predators.  The highest profile one is the Grizzlies.  There were four of them that fish and wildlife were watching up in the wedge this summer.   A boar a sow and two cubs.  I do not know if this had an impact on the removal of the wedge pack behind the curtain our not.  However a suit or petition  to de-list in the east part of the state due to impact on the Grizzlies might just work.

Have the mountain caribou been written off?  I know it was a big deal a few years back and they got some decent snowmobiling areas closed down in their name. Same on the BC side of the line they closed a lot of prime sledding area for their recovery. 


Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2013, 11:21:48 AM »
Thanks for the beta! Sure would b nice to have this and maybe some other presentations/activities/learning opportunities happen at the spring Hunt-WA get together???

KF, it's nice to see we can disagree on something's but respect each other's passion as hunters/outdoorsmen to find some common ground.

Water under the bridge  :tup:
See my sig line. 

Offline NWBREW

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 4196
  • Location: Stevens County
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2013, 11:24:46 AM »
5 black wolves were spotted near deep lake boundary road a few miles east of Northport WA chasing a few Elk yesterday- this from a person I know and trust but there is no evidence other than hearsay.




That is right by my place. I do not doubt it but if your sources name is Richard not sure how much I would trust it. I have trailcams out on my place...no wolves yet but will post when I have some. Did hear wolf howls up Cedar Creek last Nov. though.
Just one more day

Offline waterdoctor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: The Wedge
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2013, 11:33:53 AM »


Have the mountain caribou been written off?  I know it was a big deal a few years back and they got some decent snowmobiling areas closed down in their name. Same on the BC side of the line they closed a lot of prime sledding area for their recovery.

I think that the state would contend that the Mountain Caribou were covered under the undulate provisions of the management plan.  If a person is going to make a case for the caribou then he should always refer to them as the Mountain Reindeer.  Reindeer plays much better with the Bambi folks than caribou.   

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2013, 11:42:48 AM »
I'd like to meet up with you and KF if I could. Our coyotes are not howling like they used too and we don't see as many like we did 2-4 years ago.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4622
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2013, 11:52:14 AM »
The State will remain pessimistic in order to stay their course of not ever wanting to delist, and NEVER allow hunting. 

And to think WDFW sold their elk meeting as  a way to create more opportunity for hunters because  they asked for a better elk experience in the n.e. .... when in actuallity it amounts to an extra handfull of cows/calves for the wolves.

What needs to happen is all those people who signed petitions supporting wolves, and those groups that support them, need to foot the bill for wolf management in its entirety.  Stop taking our monies for wolves, and make those who desire them pay for them.  Sell them wolf permits @ 40$ each, and then send overages, like cattle bills and helicopter bills to the pro wolf conservation groups.  Its time they pay for their impact on WDFW, and its time our deer/elk/bear/turkey/moose and what have you dollars stop funding wolves.

Fair is fair.......they are getting their cake at our expense,.

WDFW is not using license dollars to fund wolf management.  That said, you are entirely correct in that the wolves are eating cake at the sportmen's expense.  Never once in the entire reintroduction process have the wolf supporters stepped up to the plate and purchased big game winter ranges or purchased conservation easements to improve winter range for ungulates.  That has and will always be my #1 beef with this program.  The abundance of deer and elk was paid for through through years of PR funds and sportsman's dollars.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline waterdoctor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: The Wedge
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2013, 11:52:40 AM »
Any one who wants to get together the 26th or 27th of march in the wedge  PM me and we will get it set up. 

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: wolf biology 101
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2013, 12:03:46 PM »
The State will remain pessimistic in order to stay their course of not ever wanting to delist, and NEVER allow hunting. 

And to think WDFW sold their elk meeting as  a way to create more opportunity for hunters because  they asked for a better elk experience in the n.e. .... when in actuallity it amounts to an extra handfull of cows/calves for the wolves.

What needs to happen is all those people who signed petitions supporting wolves, and those groups that support them, need to foot the bill for wolf management in its entirety.  Stop taking our monies for wolves, and make those who desire them pay for them.  Sell them wolf permits @ 40$ each, and then send overages, like cattle bills and helicopter bills to the pro wolf conservation groups.  Its time they pay for their impact on WDFW, and its time our deer/elk/bear/turkey/moose and what have you dollars stop funding wolves.

Fair is fair.......they are getting their cake at our expense,.

WDFW is not using license dollars to fund wolf management.  That said, you are entirely correct in that the wolves are eating cake at the sportmen's expense.  Never once in the entire reintroduction process have the wolf supporters stepped up to the plate and purchased big game winter ranges or purchased conservation easements to improve winter range for ungulates.  That has and will always be my #1 beef with this program.  The abundance of deer and elk was paid for through through years of PR funds and sportsman's dollars.

SO then, what monies IS paying for all the attention  being rendered by WDFW, and how is this money kept seperate from license/tag/permit monies   Who then foots the bill for stock depredation and helicopters/shooters/trappers ??????

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Guessing there will be a drop in whitatail archers by emac
[Today at 10:03:32 AM]


Buck age by Griiz
[Today at 07:56:25 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by Dhoey07
[Today at 06:54:48 AM]


Oregon special tag info by Judespapa
[Today at 06:22:33 AM]


Commercial crab pots going in today. by The scout
[Yesterday at 10:27:13 PM]


Missoula Fishing by jackelope
[Yesterday at 09:46:08 PM]


New fisher looking to catch some pinks this year by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 09:34:16 PM]


Desert Sheds by blindluck
[Yesterday at 09:03:55 PM]


10 kokes by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 07:05:26 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 03:55:01 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 03:14:42 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal