collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .338 VS .50  (Read 7969 times)

Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2013, 05:08:53 PM »
I had an AR-50 for a very short time. Picked it up with a Nightforce BR scope for $2700, so I couldn't pass it up. It was a great gun, well made, and was beautifully accurate. It just wasn't fun to shoot though. Recoil isn't a problem but the muzzle blast was terrible. It was sold after about 1 month and 200 rounds.

Unless you need an anti-material rifle, get the 338. You'll shoot it more and it will be just as effective for 90% of the shooting you'll likely do.  :twocents:

Andrew

Offline jjhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 2262
  • Location: Mule Deer Country
  • Aim small. Miss small.
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #16 on: February 05, 2013, 05:23:17 PM »
That is a smoking deal!

Offline jaymark6655

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 1911
  • Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2013, 05:34:27 PM »
My vote is for the .338.  Its cheaper, lighter, and has a magazine which means faster follow up shots.  I think the .338 is a more accurate long range round than the .50.  Example 300 WM sniper rifles have to print groups that are much tighter than a 50 sniper rifle to be considered acceptable.
20 Zardoz Points!

"That's the reason we pay $25 for a recoil lug made by a professional instead of one for $0.50 made by Micheal J Fox using a dremel!"

"Women should be treated the same as a French Rifle, dropped at the first sign of trouble."

"Fair is a meaningless word taught to young children."

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14545
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2013, 06:09:09 PM »
If you plan to carry while hunting, I would recommend the .338 LM.  The AR-50 is heavy to begin with and gets heavier and heavier away from the vehicle.  Most gun cases aren't long enough for the AR-50, so it has an allen screw that separates the butt portion of the stock just behind the pistol grip.  Like said above, the recoil isn't bad.  The blast to the shooter isn't all that, but everything around gets blown around or knocked over. 

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9626
  • Location: Spokane
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2013, 11:51:14 PM »
Ill have one of those savages hopefully next week :tup:

Offline Jim the Plumber

  • Local Legend
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 469
  • Hunting trespassers from the air
    • http://precisiontactical.co/
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #20 on: February 06, 2013, 10:15:21 AM »
I have both a 338L ( Custom Rbros rifle) and a Barrett 50BMG. I have also owned 2 of the AR50's. It is a big, cumbersome rifle.The two cartridges don't overlap. For most applications, the 338 is the better option.
 You can load the 50 for around $1.50-$3.50 per round and it does need dedicated reloading gear.
The 338 loads for about the same, less as much specialized gear.
If you want the fire power of the 50, try one of the bull pup styles for more portability. Barrett's 95 and 99. Bluegrass makes the Viper that is also a bull pup.

Offline Mongo Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 855
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Pew Pew lifestyle
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #21 on: February 06, 2013, 02:54:00 PM »
Im thinking the .338 is the way to go. I could get the gun and scope for the cost of JUST the .50. Now all I gotta do is convince the wife before my birthday.  :IBCOOL:
Vegetarian: Old Indian word for Bad Hunter.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

3 pintails by Dan-o
[Today at 07:20:12 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Today at 05:42:19 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by pianoman9701
[Today at 04:34:46 PM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by Alan K
[Today at 03:46:09 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Today at 12:43:12 PM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Today at 11:09:27 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Today at 10:19:35 AM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 09:55:24 AM]


If you've been following.... by HighlandLofts
[Today at 03:03:24 AM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:06:11 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal