Free: Contests & Raffles.
I've gone thru a dozen a few times and every one shot exactly the same. Beman ICS Hunters in 340. Tried 400's too. Switched this year to Easton Axis 340's. They're shooting broadheads closer than the Bemans ever did and maybe right on based on my last few shots.
Quote from: sakoshooter on April 09, 2013, 09:30:54 PMI've gone thru a dozen a few times and every one shot exactly the same. Beman ICS Hunters in 340. Tried 400's too. Switched this year to Easton Axis 340's. They're shooting broadheads closer than the Bemans ever did and maybe right on based on my last few shots.I find this quite common with carbon arrows. I think fall away rests compound the issue a little bit as well. It is my belief that the spine options with carbon are just too broad to accommodate every head, bow and archer as it was never an issue with all the aluminum spine choices. I used to set my bow for middle poundage and adjust poundage up or down until I got the spine just right to group broadheads and field points. It worked, but what a pain in the buttocks. These days I use a micro gang adjustment sight and just count clicks. I sight in for broadheads and then if I wish to shoot field points I have a click number written on the bow. I move the sight a certain number of clicks left or right and field points are sighted in. I never shoot fieldpoints during season so never a problem.
Check this out on youtube