collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Since Wolves  (Read 85363 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #165 on: October 17, 2013, 09:33:31 AM »
Taking away hunting tools such as hound hunting for cats and bears, plus the baiting of bears makes it hard to control these predators. Throw in the USFWS's 'Wild Dogs", protect them under the ESA and it pushes everything off the cliff.




Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #166 on: October 17, 2013, 09:37:26 AM »
I know of several ranchers who have never had any trouble with coyotes killing their calves until the wolves showed up. Anything but the wolves kill calves.

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #167 on: October 17, 2013, 10:03:09 AM »
I know of several ranchers who have never had any trouble with coyotes killing their calves until the wolves showed up. Anything but the wolves kill calves.

However true that may or may not be, it is a fact that feral dogs have killed more livestock in this state than wolves in recent years. I believe it was even a hunter in/from Stevens county that killed the dogs that were mentioned earlier. 

But what they killed wasn't cattle so I guess that makes all the difference.

Offline Hi-Liter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 1553
  • Location: Snohomish County
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #168 on: October 17, 2013, 10:23:27 AM »
Heck I think you should be excited the wolves are here  :chuckle:, probably will have tags for them soon. Just another tax resource for the state IMO. It will be interesting to see the data collected on births of new fawns from does in the northern counties of our state. IMO wolves will waiting for does to give birth. last weekend I saw a small pelvis and leg bones (likely from a young deer) in area where deer would come down and drink water at a spring, probably wolves stocking young deer and killed it, who knows.

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #169 on: October 17, 2013, 10:33:01 AM »
I know of several ranchers who have never had any trouble with coyotes killing their calves until the wolves showed up. Anything but the wolves kill calves.

However true that may or may not be, it is a fact that feral dogs have killed more livestock in this state than wolves in recent years. I believe it was even a hunter in/from Stevens county that killed the dogs that were mentioned earlier. 

But what they killed wasn't cattle so I guess that makes all the difference.

The difference in wolves and dogs is the death rate, we can shoot dogs and the problem goes away, an uncontrolled wolf population is a totally different story. Where I come from problem dogs aren't a problem for too long, whether they are after livestock or deer etc.. We have different rules in the country. ;)

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #170 on: October 17, 2013, 10:34:08 AM »
I know of several ranchers who have never had any trouble with coyotes killing their calves until the wolves showed up. Anything but the wolves kill calves.

However true that may or may not be, it is a fact that feral dogs have killed more livestock in this state than wolves in recent years. I believe it was even a hunter in/from Stevens county that killed the dogs that were mentioned earlier. 

But what they killed wasn't cattle so I guess that makes all the difference.



What is your solution to feral dogs? 





Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #171 on: October 17, 2013, 11:16:09 AM »
I know of several ranchers who have never had any trouble with coyotes killing their calves until the wolves showed up. Anything but the wolves kill calves.

However true that may or may not be, it is a fact that feral dogs have killed more livestock in this state than wolves in recent years. I believe it was even a hunter in/from Stevens county that killed the dogs that were mentioned earlier. 

But what they killed wasn't cattle so I guess that makes all the difference.



What is your solution to feral dogs?

Shoot them.

My point is I think it's reasonable to argue that an estimated coyote population of 50,000 in this state is far more destructive to wildlife and livestock as are feral dogs. The numbers arguably show that at the moment. Fawns die just as easily to coyotes and dogs and apparently llamas, goats, sheep, dogs, cats, etc do to. Attacks on people? Coyotes are at least equal if not ahead of wolves in that regard, that includes killing a couple kids, and with dogs, feral or otherwise, it's not even a contest.

Check this out...

http://www.farmandranchguide.com/news/livestock/coyotes-lead-the-pack-for-predator-related-livestock-losses/article_a9f8bf5a-6da9-571d-abf7-8576be1fc69b.html

More highlights...

"Coyotes may only weigh 35 to 50 pounds but their jaws can exert more than 300 pounds of bite pressure. In 2009, coyotes used those jaws to kill 2,500 sheep in the state of Montana and 12,100 lambs. Last year's total coyote-related kills cost Montana sheep ranchers over $1 million dollars in lost animals alone."

and...

"Coyotes have also killed full-sized cattle, calves and other domestic animals.

The most recent record for predator-related cattle losses came in 2005. In that year, nationwide statistics showed coyotes responsible for 51.1 percent of all cattle losses due to predators, excluding Alaska. In Montana, alone, coyotes killed 1,300 calves in 2005."



Does the wolf need to be an animal that livestock owners, pet owners, or people who feel threatened can shoot? Yes. Should there be a hunting season right now? Beats me, but I'm not convinced they're as or anymore destructive in this state than the aforementioned at the moment, and no, I'm not saying that won't change. When a hunting season is declared I will support it.

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #172 on: October 17, 2013, 11:25:27 AM »
We have different rules in the country. ;)

I doubt they're any different than when my Dad's friend rolled a dog owner's dogs off the bed of his pickup, dead, after he caught them attacking his horses or when a mob ran down the road I grew up on and attacked three boxer's that attacked and killed a goat. The sheriff had fun with that last one.

Nice try.




Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #173 on: October 17, 2013, 01:03:15 PM »
Coyotes are a plague but they don't make the news. They aren't big and don't run in packs. They do way more damage than wolves ever will. Hopefully wolves will bring the coyote population under control. One reason for the explosion in the coyote population was wolves being removed from the scene.

Coyotes don't just take down small animals either. I watched a coyote kill a two year old deer on the lake of my Alaska home town one spring.

A good friend took a great series of pictures of a coyote killing a Dall sheep yearling one spring in the Kluane Wildlife refuge in the Yukon. It was right at the visitor center there. What was weird was, the lamb just stood there and didn't try to escape as the coyote grabbed it by the throat. And there were numerous adult sheep standing around watching the whole thing and they didn't get excited in the least. When it was over, He got out of his car to take some closeups of the coyote feeding, and the coyote actually charged him and chased him back inside his car. Very aggressive actions for a coyote. I wish he'd have posted his pics on National Geographic or something similar because they were definitely worthy, albeit graphic pictures.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline turkeyfeather

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 5128
  • Location: Stevens County
  • Groups: NWTF
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #174 on: October 17, 2013, 01:43:04 PM »
I have been following this thread for a couple days now. You have your head in the sand if you can't see the link between a declining ungulate population and at the same time a rise in wolf activity and sightings. I'm sorry but only a moron can't connect those dots.  Just my  :twocents:
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation. Your character is who you actually are while your reputation is merely who others think you are.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #175 on: October 17, 2013, 01:59:51 PM »
Lets see..In 2011 a pack of 5 wild dogs killed almost 100 animals, mostly livestock up around Deer Park, near Spokane. If you check the incident reports on wolves in Washington from 2005 to present you won't even come close to that number of wolf kills on domestics. (livestock, dogs, cats etc.)

That is one pack of 5 mutts.  In Tonasket, dogs killed 9 domestic sheep this year in one incident. That is more than wolves so far this year. I personally have seen 20 plus sheep mauled by roaming packs of dogs.
 

Before blowing a bunch of hot air and calling people "rats" maybe you "wolf haters" should actually read the wolf incident reports and try and educate yourself.


He's accused me of the same thing.  Don't take it too personally....

No one every brings up the idea that habitat loss might be hurting the elk/deer populations too.  Roads, weeds, loss of logging and fire, and higher populations of other predators (bears, coyotes and lions) all have an effect.  The wolf haters on here fail to see those as being SERIOUS contributing factors and are singulalarly (and simply) focused on wolves. 

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #176 on: October 17, 2013, 02:25:35 PM »
I have been following this thread for a couple days now. You have your head in the sand if you can't see the link between a declining ungulate population and at the same time a rise in wolf activity and sightings. I'm sorry but only a moron can't connect those dots.  Just my  :twocents:

I like connecting dots, not just one dot.

You have degrading habitat as the Sierra Club et al has successfully stopped clear cutting which is leading to old growth. I don't know about you, but I avoid that stuff when I hunt since it's an eco desert. This has occurred since Clinton came out to give the spotted owl a hand in the 1990's.

You have a trapping and hound hunting ban, the affects of which are now really starting to show themselves in the form of more predation by mountain lions, bear, bobcat, and so on. That ban was passed in the 1990's.

You have wolves that started popping up back in the 1990's. Wolfbait has even posted an article demonstrating that.

And you have an ever growing coyote population that requires a 365/24/7 season.

If you think the problem will be solved by adding wolves to the list of hunted animals you're wrong. Not that they shouldn't be on that list, but if ungulate numbers are down it's because of several problems, not one. Multiple dots.


Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #177 on: October 17, 2013, 03:09:23 PM »
I have been following this thread for a couple days now. You have your head in the sand if you can't see the link between a declining ungulate population and at the same time a rise in wolf activity and sightings. I'm sorry but only a moron can't connect those dots.  Just my  :twocents:

Only a moron takes two separate happenings and relates them as cause and effect, without taking a close look at all other causes and their effects.  When you make a judgement without having all the relevant information you can make horrible mistakes. Say a bank was robbed and you were in the area so were questioned and the cops decided to arrest you because you had a wallet full of 100 dollar bills.  While this might make you suspect, it doesn't make you guilty without other collaborating evidence.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5914
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #178 on: October 17, 2013, 03:12:32 PM »
Moose Puts up Fierce Fight to Protect Her Baby from Wolves

Half dozen wolves, 1 moose calf...mid-morning nibble. Multiply this by 1/2 dz. calfs/day...in a good calfing area...30 days long..180 calfs +/-...couple that with say, the Colockum elk herd, already depleted and declining..add indians claiming the big bulls when they can. herd will be gone before you know it. great habitat up there. wolves hunt in groups, not like a single bear. Bears are also omnivirous. Add the adult elk killed throughout the year. mess in the making!!
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Since Wolves
« Reply #179 on: October 17, 2013, 03:20:27 PM »
mountainman, nobody argues that wolves don't kill ungulates and their babies. It's what they were made to do. Ungulates counter that by having lots of babies. They were never meant to all live. You're just trying to stir up emotionalism which is no better than anti hunters posting pictures of hunters killing animals or animals stuck in traps.

But for your information, ADF&G has done studies and found that bears take out way more newborn animals than wolves do. If wolves were as bad as you guys like to say, this continent would have been barren of game when Europeans arrived from all the wolves. Instead, it was teaming with wildlife of all kinds.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

DIY Ucluelet trip by metlhead
[Yesterday at 08:48:41 PM]


Burrowing Animal by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 08:22:55 PM]


Oregon spring bear by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 08:03:28 PM]


Oregon Seed #'s by Doublelunger
[Yesterday at 07:35:15 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by hunter399
[Yesterday at 04:38:43 PM]


Black Eagle arrows deals by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 02:02:59 PM]


2025 Multiseason Deer General? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 12:23:10 PM]


Last year putting in… by Dirtnap
[Yesterday at 11:48:14 AM]


Colorado Results by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 10:20:27 AM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Special T
[Yesterday at 10:19:28 AM]


Tag issues with "Get Outdoors" package by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 08:54:30 AM]


.300 Win Mag Rounds by W.Goomsba
[Yesterday at 08:29:32 AM]


Shout out to Talley Manufacturing by EnglishSetter
[May 26, 2025, 09:56:57 PM]


Knight ridge runner by Irish_hunter93
[May 26, 2025, 09:43:04 PM]


Halibut fishing by hiway_99
[May 26, 2025, 08:10:49 PM]


Desert Sheds by aer212
[May 26, 2025, 07:21:58 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal