Free: Contests & Raffles.
According to WDFW the lookout pack was the first wolves in many years.
Quote from: bearpaw on September 27, 2013, 08:57:32 AM According to WDFW the lookout pack was the first wolves in many years. What a crock
QuoteBut another question is, if it is a new pack, where will they go come winter? They have been wintering right above Lundgrens and on Ramsey and that general area.
But another question is, if it is a new pack, where will they go come winter?
Short version of whats up.... there have been wolves in the Pasayten for a long time. My question is how all of a sudden, an animal that has been kept in check and hasn't been a problem is all of a sudden pert near as plentiful as pocket gophers. Fewer rednecks taking care of business I guess.
You can bet anything that comes out of Fitkins mouth is skewed. It's amazing what they do to cover things up or story fit their adgenda.
Quote from: boneaddict on September 27, 2013, 11:51:00 AMShort version of whats up.... there have been wolves in the Pasayten for a long time. My question is how all of a sudden, an animal that has been kept in check and hasn't been a problem is all of a sudden pert near as plentiful as pocket gophers. Fewer rednecks taking care of business I guess.That's an interesting observation that I've also wondered about for multiple years now. It's rarely discussed, though.According to DNA samples, some/most of the wolves currently in the North Cascades have dropped down from BC, and more specifically, DNA from wolves in both the Lookout and Teanaway Packs indicate they or their ancestors dropped down from what is considered the coastal region of BC. It's my understanding that in certain regions of southern BC, wolf activity has increased over the last decade. If that is true, I believe it has had a significant impact on packs forming with a higher frequency in the North Cascades.
Quote from: Skyvalhunter on September 27, 2013, 12:54:51 PMYou can bet anything that comes out of Fitkins mouth is skewed. It's amazing what they do to cover things up or story fit their adgenda.I've met Scott and my impression was that he's more interested in wolverines than wolves. I'd bet a beer that the insults directed his way on Hunt WA are tame compared to what he hears from the Okanagan County Commissioners.
Quote from: Northway on September 27, 2013, 01:51:29 PMQuote from: boneaddict on September 27, 2013, 11:51:00 AMShort version of whats up.... there have been wolves in the Pasayten for a long time. My question is how all of a sudden, an animal that has been kept in check and hasn't been a problem is all of a sudden pert near as plentiful as pocket gophers. Fewer rednecks taking care of business I guess.That's an interesting observation that I've also wondered about for multiple years now. It's rarely discussed, though.According to DNA samples, some/most of the wolves currently in the North Cascades have dropped down from BC, and more specifically, DNA from wolves in both the Lookout and Teanaway Packs indicate they or their ancestors dropped down from what is considered the coastal region of BC. It's my understanding that in certain regions of southern BC, wolf activity has increased over the last decade. If that is true, I believe it has had a significant impact on packs forming with a higher frequency in the North Cascades.Have hunting practices regarding wolves in BC changed in that time? That would explain that I suspect. We don't have a very big hunting community in WA and I have a hard time believing it would have had that much of an impact since most don't hunt where the wolves have been up that way. But if BC wolves haven't been hunted like they used to be I don't think it would be too surprising to see the population we do now. Particularly with the population from Idaho et al coming in from the east at the same time.