Free: Contests & Raffles.
I received what I feel is the final conformation just now. This is happening. Shooters from the USDA are doing it. I have known this person more than 20 years. He is straight up with me.He said in a short answer to a email I sent Yes by the USDA.So I was a doubter, now I am 100% convinced.To the OP thank you for the heads up.For myself I am sickened . The elk are a problem, but hunters could have been part of the solution. Why not shoot them if they must and let un filled tag holders tag the meat. At least some of the folks who plug down there cash for tags and permit draws could maybe get some thing back.
Quote from: ghosthunter on October 27, 2013, 09:30:45 AMI received what I feel is the final conformation just now. This is happening. Shooters from the USDA are doing it. I have known this person more than 20 years. He is straight up with me.He said in a short answer to a email I sent Yes by the USDA.So I was a doubter, now I am 100% convinced.To the OP thank you for the heads up.For myself I am sickened . The elk are a problem, but hunters could have been part of the solution. Why not shoot them if they must and let un filled tag holders tag the meat. At least some of the folks who plug down there cash for tags and permit draws could maybe get some thing back.The USDA? This is comical on so many different levels!
Quote from: ghosthunter on October 27, 2013, 09:30:45 AMI received what I feel is the final conformation just now. This is happening. Shooters from the USDA are doing it. I have known this person more than 20 years. He is straight up with me.He said in a short answer to a email I sent Yes by the USDA.So I was a doubter, now I am 100% convinced.To the OP thank you for the heads up.For myself I am sickened . The elk are a problem, but hunters could have been part of the solution. Why not shoot them if they must and let un filled tag holders tag the meat. At least some of the folks who plug down there cash for tags and permit draws could maybe get some thing back.That is a little less than 100% convincing
Quote from: huntnphool on October 27, 2013, 09:58:15 AMQuote from: ghosthunter on October 27, 2013, 09:30:45 AMI received what I feel is the final conformation just now. This is happening. Shooters from the USDA are doing it. I have known this person more than 20 years. He is straight up with me.He said in a short answer to a email I sent Yes by the USDA.So I was a doubter, now I am 100% convinced.To the OP thank you for the heads up.For myself I am sickened . The elk are a problem, but hunters could have been part of the solution. Why not shoot them if they must and let un filled tag holders tag the meat. At least some of the folks who plug down there cash for tags and permit draws could maybe get some thing back.The USDA? This is comical on so many different levels!No it's not. The USDA oversees the USFS and a detachment known as Wildlife Services. Wildlife Services does lots of hunting and trapping of 'problem animals'. This includes deer, coyotes, used to include wolves, etc. They use lots of aerial gunning and even poison in some states. I think Wildlife Services takes out more coyotes than all of hunter combined. They like to hire former military/LEO snipers for some of their positions.
I for one have seen enough to think that there very likely is something to all this. And heads should roll. Some of you all need to check your priorities. When a member comes on and informs us he believes he knows of a injustice that affects us all we should listen and help check into it. Not sit behind a keyboard like a coward and attack the guy just cause he is a new member. You all were new members once. Does that mean you first 50-100 posts were all B.S. too as you think everyone elses is
Is this gmu near the elk area that got all the bad press a few years ago when some people got video of the elk being arrowed in the pasture?I could see WDFW wanting to control numbers in a way that they felt would get the job done quick and quiet.
What a shame! Not only are hunters denied opportunity that our money should provide but the WDFW gives itself another blackeye. I get that it may not be feasable to get hunters on private property to control this herd but why not trap and transport a portion of the herd to another area? Animals like these could be used to bolster another population or start a new population where elk currently don't reside. These elk could do much more for the future of hunting in our state instead of being covertly terminated. I'm sickened by this!
I would like to see problem elk relocated across the river into the hills of the sauk unit.
Quote from: turkeyfeather on October 27, 2013, 10:13:42 AMI for one have seen enough to think that there very likely is something to all this. And heads should roll. Some of you all need to check your priorities. When a member comes on and informs us he believes he knows of a injustice that affects us all we should listen and help check into it. Not sit behind a keyboard like a coward and attack the guy just cause he is a new member. You all were new members once. Does that mean you first 50-100 posts were all B.S. too as you think everyone elses isSo every unsubstantiated claim on the net should be believed? When asked for more information, the OP replied we should go look ourselves, even though he himself lives with 25 miles?