Free: Contests & Raffles.
It seems like you have had too much politically correct BS hammered into your subconcious. Killing stuff is what we do as hunters. Nothing wrong with it. It is management of the species.
Quote from: cmiller85 on October 28, 2013, 03:15:18 PMIt seems like you have had too much politically correct BS hammered into your subconcious. Killing stuff is what we do as hunters. Nothing wrong with it. It is management of the species.So when we say we are going deer hunting we are being politically correct? Your answer must be going deer killing. Also when we hunt legal we must be politically correct as well? So if you are hunting legal don't tell me about being politically correct.
I like harvest because it implies killing with the intent to consume as food. I don't have an issue with trophy hunting but tend to eat what I kill (until I start varmint hunting this year )What drives me crazy is when I get back from a hunt and my non hunting friends ask if I "caught" anything? Yes I caught these ducks with a net (a net of #4s)
It can't be hdshot murdered a deer. I'm sorry but I couldn't resist
Fruits and vegetables are harvested. Game animals are killed. No need to sugar coat it, in my opinion.
I chuckle at the "caught" term....I just explain that its not a fish...I had the killing talk with my son before we set out for our first hunt. I made (tried at least) to make sure he understood....we are killing, taking a life. What we do can not be undone. We own it. Hence, killing, not harvesting. However, I see your point and don't think you are wrong in any way by saying harvest has an implication of consumption above anything else.