collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Is WDFW fulfilling it's legislative mandates? Grade their performance!

Yes
7 (5.6%)
No
51 (40.5%)
Undecided
4 (3.2%)
A
0 (0%)
B
1 (0.8%)
C
12 (9.5%)
D
26 (20.6%)
F
25 (19.8%)

Total Members Voted: 83

Author Topic: POLL: Is WDFW fulfilling it's legislative mandates?  (Read 9367 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
Re: POLL: Is WDFW fulfilling it's legislative mandates?
« Reply #30 on: February 23, 2014, 08:34:37 PM »
The Commision and Director job is so politisized they won't make any decisions that aren't PC.
I don't know how you will ever get around that.
This is the simple truth. To many groups to please, not all will be happy.
What's better; having a Director that is appointed by the Commission (WDFW), or having one that is elected by all citizens (such as the DNR Director)?
In reality they are all defacto appointed by the Governor, Commisioners and Director.
Not really the way it is supposed to be. Commisioners are supposed to be confirmed by the Senate but it doesn't really work that way.
If the Senate  had to confirm before they could serve it would allow better representation by rural areas IMHO. It would make it easier to block more controversial appointments like Keyne.
True. But Kehne was confirmed, and did have Republicans voting in favor of his confirmation...

Offline T-Dozzer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2013
  • Posts: 868
  • Location: East and West
Re: POLL: Is WDFW fulfilling it's legislative mandates?
« Reply #31 on: March 03, 2014, 07:31:11 PM »
I give them an "F" for their lack of willingness to do anything to control the tribal overharvest issue.


 :yeah:

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal