Free: Contests & Raffles.
Your yellowstone example is full of fallacies,...but lets just get one thing straight: Logging and fires have huge impacts to elk numbers and if you can't see that...well there is no point trying to explain it to you. The boom in elk numbers in Idaho in the 70's and 80's was a direct result of heavy logging post WWII. Now, since you don't want to talk science please address my other question: Who was axed at IDFG "by the people of Idaho"? Please be specific...or retract your mis-informed statement.
So this whole aging forest habitat theory isn't worth the paper it's written on.
Quote from: bearpaw on March 20, 2014, 10:57:05 AMSo this whole aging forest habitat theory isn't worth the paper it's written on. This is where I am getting your "logging and fire don't improve elk numbers" stance. But they say 90% of communication is non-verbal so maybe I missed something... Im not sure which guys specifically you are talking about Former director and Salmon region RS...the most recent ones to retire? However, the primary biologists and wildlife admin staff are the same guys and have been for at least the last 12-15 years or so. I do not believe there are any "greenies" with any power at all in IDFG...they are very much a hook and bullet agency from top to bottom.