Free: Contests & Raffles.
Just think if all the hunters, fisherman, rednecks and whoever else is sick of these assnine liberals, left this state and left it to ALL the liberals running it. They would beg us to come back and clean up their messes they created. I'm looking at moving a long ways away from here in a couple years, if not sooner.
Quote from: CAMPMEAT on April 22, 2014, 11:35:06 AMJust think if all the hunters, fisherman, rednecks and whoever else is sick of these assnine liberals, left this state and left it to ALL the liberals running it. They would beg us to come back and clean up their messes they created. I'm looking at moving a long ways away from here in a couple years, if not sooner. I'm already jealous you live in curlew, I can't wait to get the hell out of this state. 8 years I hope to retire and move to Idaho or Montana.
Quote from: wolfbait on April 22, 2014, 09:34:52 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on April 22, 2014, 06:38:42 AMWDFW LE watch hunting-washington.com. I would advise discretion in the things you report or pass on here. Just sayin'. I agree!I have heard that many WDFW LE feel the same as many of us, where wolves are concerned, that being said they still have a job to enforce the the laws. Remember IDFG and their LE? Look the other way boys.The problem is WDFW refuses to confirm livestock killed by wolves useless they have no other choice. I think WDFW LE take a lot of heat for WDFW's poor decisions over wolf killed livestock. Remember in the past WDFW sent the info to Olympia to see whether to call it a wolf kill or not. If that isn't enough WDFW's biologist go out of their way to blame everything but wolves. It was a cougar, a coyote, the eagles did it, etc..In the past most confirmation of wolf packs have come from wolves killing livestock, so if WDFW refuse to deal with problem wolves, why would ranchers call them for help? I think this suits WDFW just fine. DoW, CNW, etc. don't want the wolves delisted, and it sure seems WDFW feel the same.The problem is you guys have been crying wolf since before wolves set foot in this state.Seriously, the second it was confirmed that a wolf was walking around near Wenatchee photos started popping up on here (like within days) of a "wolf kill" near there that looked more like a cougar kill. No one was posting "wolf kill" pictures of dead livestock from that area until word got out that they were there. That's not suspicious or anything. If no one listens when kills are called in there is a good reason. EVERYTHING is called a wolf kill now. It's a nice way to try and skim a buck while also pointing blame at a predator you don't want.They should stop compensating anyone for wolf kills.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on April 22, 2014, 06:38:42 AMWDFW LE watch hunting-washington.com. I would advise discretion in the things you report or pass on here. Just sayin'. I agree!I have heard that many WDFW LE feel the same as many of us, where wolves are concerned, that being said they still have a job to enforce the the laws. Remember IDFG and their LE? Look the other way boys.The problem is WDFW refuses to confirm livestock killed by wolves useless they have no other choice. I think WDFW LE take a lot of heat for WDFW's poor decisions over wolf killed livestock. Remember in the past WDFW sent the info to Olympia to see whether to call it a wolf kill or not. If that isn't enough WDFW's biologist go out of their way to blame everything but wolves. It was a cougar, a coyote, the eagles did it, etc..In the past most confirmation of wolf packs have come from wolves killing livestock, so if WDFW refuse to deal with problem wolves, why would ranchers call them for help? I think this suits WDFW just fine. DoW, CNW, etc. don't want the wolves delisted, and it sure seems WDFW feel the same.
WDFW LE watch hunting-washington.com. I would advise discretion in the things you report or pass on here. Just sayin'.
I don't think livestock losses should be compensated either. First of all, it wasn't the WDFW that put the wolves here. Second, we just can't afford to pay out money every time a wolf, cougar, bear, or other predator kills someone's animal. It's the cost of doing business. You raise cattle in wolf habitat? Well then, expect to have the wolves eat a few. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree, ranchers should be able to shoot wolves on sight.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: bobcat on April 22, 2014, 12:29:21 PMI agree, ranchers should be able to shoot wolves on sight.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkWho says they're not. No collar, No trace. Just saying.
Quote from: VarmintVentilator on April 22, 2014, 12:53:02 PMQuote from: bobcat on April 22, 2014, 12:29:21 PMI agree, ranchers should be able to shoot wolves on sight.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkWho says they're not. No collar, No trace. Just saying.Hey, whatever they gotta do to protect their livestock is fine by me. Just don't go looking for handouts from the WDFW. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk