Free: Contests & Raffles.
Fortunately for sportsmen, whether they know it or not, WDFW relies on their own experts and an independent team of experts to guide them in solving and managing this complex problem. Its great there is civic engagement by resort park owners, sporting goods stores, and journalism majors...it really is...but thank goodness they are not in charge of the scientific evaluations or management of our wildlife. I did appreciate how the OP's link took me straight to a website where there was a huge banner advertising where I could by the OP's book online Sales must be a little slow this month so time to drum up activity to the website But more interesting to me, I found it somewhat amusing (or maybe sad) that the author gives more credence to the owner of "Bobs sporting goods" than he does independent veterinary and wildlife experts in solving a complex wildlife disease issue.I continue to be disappointed at how people are more interested in trashing these independent experts and public servants than they are in actually solving the hoof disease issues. At some point I would hope the grand standing and self promotion could stop so that we can focus solely on solving the real problem and not just look for ways to grab headlines and mislead the public, ultimately delaying real solutions for protecting and managing our wildlife resources.
WDFW has had 20 years to figure this out..... I guess we should keep relying on their expertise. It might only be another 15 or 20 years before they get something done. Buy the book, you should have something to do other than tout the wonderful job WDFW has done.
Quote from: t6 on August 13, 2014, 01:40:43 PMWDFW has had 20 years to figure this out..... I guess we should keep relying on their expertise. It might only be another 15 or 20 years before they get something done. Buy the book, you should have something to do other than tout the wonderful job WDFW has done. Well, their panel of experts are top notch. That poster told you so!
How the mods on here will censor me for pointing out that you unabashedly toe the WDFW company line for your personal reasons yet never censor you for slamming and discrediting another poster is beyond me.
It must be very dissatisfying to be on the wrong side of this issue. Funny thing is, you didn't dispute a single thing in the article. You know someone's off-base when they can only resort to childish personal attacks. By the way, Bruce Barnes said he had a very interesting phone conversation with you a few weeks back. What did you guys talk about?
Quote from: pianoman9701 on August 13, 2014, 01:29:03 PMHow the mods on here will censor me for pointing out that you unabashedly toe the WDFW company line for your personal reasons yet never censor you for slamming and discrediting another poster is beyond me.Its very simple Piano, I don't call people names. It is fine to disagree or point out where folks are wrong as I do in this thread. There is no name calling or personal attacks. I disagree with the OP and his motives and tactics. Personally, I'm sure he is a talented author and a wonderful human being. Quote from: jongosch on August 13, 2014, 01:34:28 PMIt must be very dissatisfying to be on the wrong side of this issue. Funny thing is, you didn't dispute a single thing in the article. You know someone's off-base when they can only resort to childish personal attacks. By the way, Bruce Barnes said he had a very interesting phone conversation with you a few weeks back. What did you guys talk about?I have numerous times pointed out where you are just dead wrong...in this instance I was merely pointing out my general observation that you give more credence to bobs sporting goods than a whole panel of independent experts...some may agree with you that a retail store owner has more knowledge of wildlife disease than veterinarians and biologists in wa...I don't. I see no need to rehash all of the things you and I disagree on. Herbicides are not the direct cause of this disease, it is a bacterial infection, it is limited to the hooves and does not effect the meat, however I would not rule out some larger habitat issue (partially caused by herbicide application?) as potentially contributing to the disease.I have never spoken with Mr. Barnes...he doesn't know me so there is no way he could have possibly called me. I'm not sure what you are even remotely suggesting with that absurd statement. However, I sincerely hope that he is recovering from the motorcycle accident as quickly as possible.
Idaho.... What "Independent Experts" Do you mean the ones funded by Big Timber? or the ones working for Chemical Companies? You'll have to clarify that for me since WDFW doesn't seem to have an answer as to why the "Independent Experts" were called in.
Hmm, he seemed to have a different impression. Something about one of WDFW's contract vendors. Guess it was just a big coincidence.
Listed is Anne Fairbrother who works for Exponent..... Do your research or read the posts... Exponent represents the chemical companies...... is that hard to figure out?
I've been reading a great book about the Columbia River and just happened upon this amazing passage:"Dr. Lowell Sever, an epidemiologist in Seattle who works for Battelle Laboratories and is one of the country's leading researchers on the relationship between environment and birth defects, said there are no solid studies anywhere in the world that suggest an association between birth defects and low-level radiation exposure of the kind that occurred downwind of Hanford. Sever participated in a study that did find elevated rates of birth defects around Hanford between 1968 and 1980, a period when atmospheric leaks form the plutonium factory were all but nonexistent. But he and his colleagues attributed the cluster of birth defects to intensive use of pesticides by farmers."Pesticides: Worse than plutoniumHere's the link to the study: http://articles.latimes.com/1988-07-06/news/mn-5345_1_birth-defect
Sever participated in a study that did find elevated rates of birth defects around Hanford between 1968 and 1980, a period when atmospheric leaks form the plutonium factory were all but nonexistent.