collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Unscientific Game Cam tests.  (Read 4466 times)

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« on: December 08, 2008, 09:07:51 PM »


The cams were not completely level nor were they aimed at the exact same location. Everything was very generalized and kind of hurried. All use SD type cards. The pics were taken from about 5 paces or aprox 15 feet. The pics have been reduced to get as close to the parameters below for fast loading.
640 x 480
72 DPI
Optimized for the web at 100 kb



Left to right.
Moultrie  DGS-I40
Moultrie DGW-100
Cuddeback Capture IR
Wildview BubbaCam/EZ Cam

Moultrie DGS-I40
This GameSpy is a 4 mega pixel infrared camera that uses 6 D batteries. This one I bought in the bargain cave at Cabela’s as refurbished and I will not do that again. You buy, you own. No returns. This one was nearly $160.00 and the laser for aiming doesn’t work. The battery/SD card compartment is a pain in the butt to get in and out of. There are two thumbscrews to the main door and another to access the battery area. The card is very hard to remove if you have fingers larger then a child.
From the box:
Rapid Response Time
150 Day Battery Life
Captures Moon Phase and Temperature
50 ft. Infrared Flash
Captures Day and Night Video Clips
32 Mgs Internal Memory



Moultrie DGW-100
I paid $100.00 for this 1.3 mega pixel cam a couple years ago and never really used it. The battery life was horrible with brand name lantern batteries. My father has used these cams with rechargeable batteries and can sometimes get a couple weeks out of a charge. The battery is easy to access and change as well as the SD card.



Cuddeback Capture IR
I just bought this at Cabela’s for $229.00 and have yet to use it. Actually, after these tests I may take it back. The infrared seems to work too well at close distances and not well enough beyond 15 feet with no real “sweet spot”.  It takes pics at 1.3 mega pixels at night and 5 mega pixels during the day. I have not tried it in the daytime yet. This cam uses 4 D batteries and they are easy to install. The SD card is easy to access as well.
From the box: Super Simple Setup
Hair Trigger
25 ft range
Extra Long Battery Life
Faster Recovery Time
Weatherproof Housing
5 Delay Settings



Wildview BubbaCam
Well a cheap toy got me again. This cam was only $50 so I thought I would give it a try. This 1.3 mega pixel cam uses 4 C batteries, which are easy to install, and the SD card is also easy to access.
From the box: Hassle Free Set Up
Wide Angle Coverage
30 ft. auto flash
Test mode
External LCD Image Counter
SD slot
Time/Date Stamping






Offline Michelle_Nelson

  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 7974
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Bring on the Bears!
Re: Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2008, 09:20:36 PM »
BTKR I wanna look at that I - 40 next time I see you.  I wanna see what you are talking about with trying to get the card and stuff out.

Did you call the manufacturer and see if they will fix it?

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2008, 09:28:59 PM »
BTKR I wanna look at that I - 40 next time I see you.  I wanna see what you are talking about with trying to get the card and stuff out.

Did you call the manufacturer and see if they will fix it?

There is no way to fix it. It is more of a design flaw.




Offline SHANE(WA)

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1297
  • Location: MEAD, WA
Re: Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2008, 11:28:12 PM »
I hear you about the card, its a flaw, but I dont have issues getting it out, use both my index fingers and slide it out.

Offline Michelle_Nelson

  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 7974
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Bring on the Bears!
Re: Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2008, 11:33:29 PM »
Yeah I understood the card thing was a design flaw. 

I was actually talking about the laser for aiming.  Did you call the company to see if they would fix it?  I didn't make myself clear in my previous post.

If you don't already have it out I am curious to see how hard the card would be to get out for me.  Since I have some what smaller hands.   :)

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2008, 04:28:06 PM »


I was actually talking about the laser for aiming.  Did you call the company to see if they would fix it?  I didn't make myself clear in my previous post.

No, not worth the money to send it in.




Offline bucklucky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 9541
  • Location: Skookumchuck Wa.
    • Charlie Smith
Re: Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2008, 10:04:23 AM »
Thats a real good review Willy! Have you thought about putting together a camera yourself? I think it might be the way to go?

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2008, 05:48:43 PM »
Thats a real good review Willy! Have you thought about putting together a camera yourself? I think it might be the way to go?

I think there is more that I could do but I am too busy right now. I am thinking about making my own, but again, just too busy right now.




Offline Michelle_Nelson

  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 7974
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Bring on the Bears!
Re: Unscientific Game Cam tests.
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2008, 06:04:38 PM »
Those 4 hour naps in the middle of the day really cut into your time don't they!  :chuckle:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by jackelope
[Today at 09:39:03 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by 2MANY
[Today at 09:00:29 AM]


Big buck, bad eye by 2MANY
[Today at 08:59:17 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by kodiak10
[Today at 08:35:38 AM]


CITES hide sealer and Fur Harvesters Receiving Agent info Pt 1 by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:35:28 AM]


Color phase fox by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:32:56 AM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by kodiak10
[Today at 08:20:31 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:19:02 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:18:03 AM]


re-barreling a gun by Wingin it
[Today at 06:52:34 AM]


Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by Wingin it
[Today at 06:45:11 AM]


Possible record bull? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:44:10 AM]


Entiat Modern hunting by vandeman17
[Today at 06:42:15 AM]


My new BB Gun by FlyFish360
[Today at 03:09:02 AM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by Berner5
[Yesterday at 09:18:43 PM]


Research Request - Deer, Moose & Elk Samples by cjc23
[Yesterday at 09:09:08 PM]


We lost one of our own (Colockumelk) by cem3434
[Yesterday at 08:46:12 PM]


Found tripod by royalbull
[Yesterday at 06:49:42 PM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by bb76
[Yesterday at 06:10:17 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Houmike
[Yesterday at 03:16:47 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal