collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....  (Read 10011 times)

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« on: October 29, 2014, 06:34:03 AM »
I love reading some of this stuff. "My uncle's rifle shoots .3moa with core lokts".  My 12 dollar scope is all I need to rip world record 500-yard groups.....etc, etc.

I'm a bit of a realist. I have a barrel of factory barrels that have come off actions and I would wage a bet that not a one will be under .001" runout, which is 5 times more than any self respecting accuracy smith will let out the door. I've shot several videos of Remington actions on the lathe with the bolt centerline at zero and the face flopping wildly. I have never seen a recoil lug on a factory gun be square. .....ever. crowns are cut at the factory with about 10 seconds of care....

What's all this mean? If you are seriously getting a factory rifle to shoot sub .5moa for 10 rounds, you are both very lucky and very lucky.

If you are seriously interested in what makes a rifle accurate,  I would suggest a copy of "rifle accuracy facts" by Harold Vaughn. He's possibly the smartest gun nut alive and takes actual measurement on every aspect of a rife that you and all of your buddies can dream up. I'm rarely over my head on tech data,  but I had to read a couple chapters REALLY SLOWLY.

if you think I'm full of it, keep shooting squirrels at 1500 with grandpa's 30-30 wearing that buck master.

Offline Miles

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 3533
  • Location: Pensacola, Florida
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2014, 06:53:15 AM »
This is what you wake up thinking about? 

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2014, 06:54:27 AM »
Litz does a good job of covering ballistic study and a call to the ballistician at Sierra is always a good listen. 

Richard Franklin produced a video that covers reloading with Wilson dies better than any I have seen and explains the "why" to do and not do certain things.

Les Brooks has made available to the public a thumb drive filled with 30 years of experience as the instructor of gunsmithing at tsjc.
These are all awesome reference pieces that serious accuracy hounds should have available. Franklin's hand loading being a must-have.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2014, 06:55:35 AM »
This is what you wake up thinking about? 

I didn't get to go hunting and I had a great time reading some stuff.....lol

Offline addicted

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 5300
  • Location: A forest near you
  • The famous FootDog
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2014, 11:10:09 AM »
Putting the books in the shopping cart
"Right now, I am thinking that If my grandmother was here, she would be lecturing me about how there are poor people in Africa, that would just love to have a Ruger, I would just say "Great, granny, lets just ship all the Rugers to Africa!"


Loving life in the Great Northwest one day at a time.

It sounds like it's time to get a new gun.

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2014, 11:16:24 AM »
This is good information.  I am glad there are people who wake up thinking about stuff like this.  :)

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2014, 11:25:12 AM »
I've had 250.00 Remington 788's shoot just as well as one of my 2500.00 customs. When it comes to accuracy the rifle and load has to be capable first, then it's up to its driver. Sure reading may help for a beginner or fill in the blanks for someone further along. Nothing can replace the expirience from actual trigger time (Lots of it)and proper shooting techniques.

There is no perfect way to go about it, it's what works for the individual. In my expirience around many a long range shooter and or accuracy driven types. They either have it or they don't.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2014, 12:22:28 PM »
I'm at the age now where I prefer to take as many variables out as possible as opposed to play luck's card.....

Every gun will shoot something reasonably well. I prefer those that shoot everything reasonably well.

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2014, 12:30:26 PM »
In my expirience over the years, there are certain cartridges that shoot most everything reasonably well. The .300 Win Mag being one of them.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2014, 12:50:03 PM »
One thing that I see pooch accuracy and is overlooked is optics.  I have seen scopes doom a good rifle plenty of times.

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2014, 12:59:11 PM »
trigger pull and stock binding are the two biggest issues in my mind , with a little work most guns will shoot better than us. though it is cool to have a 5k rifle that clover leafs at 300 yards  :chuckle: ten shot groups don't interest me in the least . three shot groups 1/2 moa on a cold bore work for me :tup: I don't know why you guys are wasting so much money on powder and lead when the 6.5x284 flat gets it done ! lol. now go shoot that beer can at 600 yards cold bore with a 10 mph cross wind using spot on ballistics  :chuckle:

Offline b23

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2014, 01:01:48 PM »
In my expirience over the years, there are certain cartridges that shoot most everything reasonably well. The .300 Win Mag being one of them.

I'd agree with that but I also believe cartridges that are less "overbore", I use that term VERY loosely, tend to be that way.  That IS NOT meant as a slight in any way toward a 300 Win Mag.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2014, 01:08:22 PM »

One thing that I see pooch accuracy and is overlooked is optics.  I have seen scopes doom a good rifle plenty of times.
Can you elaborate?

My dad recently got a cooper rifle chambered in 300 weatherby. He kept attempting load development at 200 yards and was growing frustrated. I talked him into just sticking to 100 yards and he found a couple good loads from 1/2-3/4 range then wanted to fine tune at 200 and his groups opened up significantly, like 4 inches. Turns out it was parallax causing it. He's got a vx6 4-24 power and at 24 power he didn't have it adjusted correctly... Neither of us had any idea parallax could change point of impact. I always just thought it was for focusing and that's it. After learning how to adjust for it my groups tightened up significantly as well. So I'm curious as to what you have to say on the optics side of the discussion

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2014, 03:17:11 PM »
trigger pull and stock binding are the two biggest issues in my mind , with a little work most guns will shoot better than us. though it is cool to have a 5k rifle that clover leafs at 300 yards  :chuckle: ten shot groups don't interest me in the least . three shot groups 1/2 moa on a cold bore work for me :tup: I don't know why you guys are wasting so much money on powder and lead when the 6.5x284 flat gets it done ! lol. now go shoot that beer can at 600 yards cold bore with a 10 mph cross wind using spot on ballistics  :chuckle:

I did except it was 800 yds and 260ai. .....wink.

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2014, 03:50:15 PM »
trigger pull and stock binding are the two biggest issues in my mind , with a little work most guns will shoot better than us. though it is cool to have a 5k rifle that clover leafs at 300 yards  :chuckle: ten shot groups don't interest me in the least . three shot groups 1/2 moa on a cold bore work for me :tup: I don't know why you guys are wasting so much money on powder and lead when the 6.5x284 flat gets it done ! lol. now go shoot that beer can at 600 yards cold bore with a 10 mph cross wind using spot on ballistics  :chuckle:

I did except it was 800 yds and 260ai. .....wink.
every body gets lucky once  :chuckle:

Offline VarmintVentilator

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 445
  • Location: Rock City
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2014, 04:21:16 PM »
I'm fortunate enough to be able to shoot on my own place, which means I shoot quite a bit.  It's just a fun hobby that I do.  I don't have a fancy 18lb. custom target gun that cost $5000.00 plus, just my hunting rifle.  But the only thing that is stalk on it is the action.  It does 3/4 moa at a 1000 yards which isn't bad.  The thing that has helped with shooting out to that distance is when hunting deer, that 2-3 hundred yard shot is easy, with shot placement being precise.  I personally won't shoot at deer at long distance, but the practice is good and it's fun.  If it's a coyote, now that's a different story.   :chuckle:   

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2014, 04:21:26 PM »
In my expirience over the years, there are certain cartridges that shoot most everything reasonably well. The .300 Win Mag being one of them.

I agree!  Seems .30 cal is a magician.  30-30, 308Win, 30-06, 300WM every one I have had from lever guns to LR target rifles seem very adaptive to bullet weight and designs.  Even to factory ammo to a large degree.  My 7mm's on the other hand can be fickle little B$%ches :o
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2014, 04:36:26 PM »
In my expirience over the years, there are certain cartridges that shoot most everything reasonably well. The .300 Win Mag being one of them.
2nd that one! Also love 243 for <500.  Glad I'm not the only one who wakes up talking about this.
I did have a cheap REM 770 that would shoot 1/3 moa out to 500 (3 shot not 10) but only with 58gr vmax and re15  still have that gun but after 4000ish rounds its close to moa on a good day. Worse others.  Now I'm shooting a custom 700 SPS Varmint in an XLR chassi topped with a viper PST. Timmeny pro and Berger columns these shoot great! I shoot a 3" steel at 400 pretty good but stretch it to 500 and I'm having trouble keeping it on a 6" unless there's no wind. 10 round sessions.
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2014, 06:45:43 PM »

One thing that I see pooch accuracy and is overlooked is optics.  I have seen scopes doom a good rifle plenty of times.
Can you elaborate?

My dad recently got a cooper rifle chambered in 300 weatherby. He kept attempting load development at 200 yards and was growing frustrated. I talked him into just sticking to 100 yards and he found a couple good loads from 1/2-3/4 range then wanted to fine tune at 200 and his groups opened up significantly, like 4 inches. Turns out it was parallax causing it. He's got a vx6 4-24 power and at 24 power he didn't have it adjusted correctly... Neither of us had any idea parallax could change point of impact. I always just thought it was for focusing and that's it. After learning how to adjust for it my groups tightened up significantly as well. So I'm curious as to what you have to say on the optics side of the discussion

Parallax will manifest itself for sure. It exists in all scopes to some degree,  but somewhere just north of 10x it becomes troublesome. If you move your head while looking through the scope, and the reticle moves.....you are watching parallax in real time. My reference was to scopes that won't repeat or shifting zero. I've seen several that just quit holding zero at some point. I had a very lightweight 300rum that just beat scopes to death. Some lost reticles, some didn't but would never hold after the whooping. If you ever get a chance to watch a slow motion video of the recoil and what it does to a scope it's a wonder they hold up as well as they do.

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2014, 06:54:58 PM »
And none of this matters if you can't read wind.......

Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2014, 08:34:40 PM »
And none of this matters if you can't read wind.......
I don't need to read wind, I'm only shooting at 100 yards. :chuckle: Besides, my Kestrel said that it's a 5 mph wind here, it must be the same 800 yards away too! :bash:

I did have a factory Savage LRPV in 22-250 that was a sub .25 MOA gun at 100 yards for 5 shot groups every time I took it out. Every once in a while it would cut that in half. This was with a very specific load though that never did better than .5 MOA past 200 yards no matter who shot it. I never wanted to test my luck by trying for 10 shots groups though! I only see a need for 10 shot groups with serious target guns. My long range plinking guns get 5 shot groups at 300 yards or greater, and the hunting guns get 3 shot groups at whatever range I decide is their max.

Andrew

Offline longrangekiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 711
  • Location: buckley wa.
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2014, 10:03:58 PM »
High country. quick question about parallax. im running a 4.5-14X50 leupold vx-3 on my 300 rum and it has no parallax adjustment. im just curious how it is adjusted or dose it not need to be? like i seen was mentioned and what ive heard before that after 10x it will mess with your shot placement
work hard but hunt harder

Offline Cap.Silver

  • My love is the outdoors
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1251
  • Location: US/DE/CZ
  • If not fishing then hunting
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2014, 10:35:35 PM »
Highcountry ,you're not the only one who thinks about stuff. I've been going through long range shooting info on line for days ....scopes (first focal,second etc) reticles and bullets etc..... its the weather  :chuckle:
Everyone thinks that I'm freak ,I don't look different do I ?

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2014, 10:48:11 PM »
In my expirience over the years, there are certain cartridges that shoot most everything reasonably well. The .300 Win Mag being one of them.

I agree!  Seems .30 cal is a magician.  30-30, 308Win, 30-06, 300WM every one I have had from lever guns to LR target rifles seem very adaptive to bullet weight and designs.  Even to factory ammo to a large degree.  My 7mm's on the other hand can be fickle little B$%ches :o

I like my fickle 7mm08 she did exactly what I expected her persnickety butt to do :chuckle: I cleaned her then went to make sure scope and such and whats were still on.  I had no trigger time really this last year...but she does what she does....first one was a flyer...next two touching right where I sent them.  dirty little.....

apparently my AR I built is a good lil gun as well its off on safari visiting a friend and they have been having fun with it, it felt good being told I built a good gun. 

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #24 on: October 29, 2014, 11:35:16 PM »
In my expirience over the years, there are certain cartridges that shoot most everything reasonably well. The .300 Win Mag being one of them.

I agree!  Seems .30 cal is a magician.  30-30, 308Win, 30-06, 300WM every one I have had from lever guns to LR target rifles seem very adaptive to bullet weight and designs.  Even to factory ammo to a large degree.  My 7mm's on the other hand can be fickle little B$%ches :o

I like my fickle 7mm08 she did exactly what I expected her persnickety butt to do :chuckle: I cleaned her then went to make sure scope and such and whats were still on.  I had no trigger time really this last year...but she does what she does....first one was a flyer...next two touching right where I sent them.  dirty little.....

apparently my AR I built is a good lil gun as well its off on safari visiting a friend and they have been having fun with it, it felt good being told I built a good gun.

Women probably appreciate "Fickle" more than the average guy :chuckle: 

I love my 7's, but they don't much care for simple stop and shop cubic zirconia.  Mine demand diamonds...and the higher the quality the better they treat me ;)
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #25 on: October 29, 2014, 11:53:14 PM »
In my expirience over the years, there are certain cartridges that shoot most everything reasonably well. The .300 Win Mag being one of them.

I agree!  Seems .30 cal is a magician.  30-30, 308Win, 30-06, 300WM every one I have had from lever guns to LR target rifles seem very adaptive to bullet weight and designs.  Even to factory ammo to a large degree.  My 7mm's on the other hand can be fickle little B$%ches :o

I like my fickle 7mm08 she did exactly what I expected her persnickety butt to do :chuckle: I cleaned her then went to make sure scope and such and whats were still on.  I had no trigger time really this last year...but she does what she does....first one was a flyer...next two touching right where I sent them.  dirty little.....

apparently my AR I built is a good lil gun as well its off on safari visiting a friend and they have been having fun with it, it felt good being told I built a good gun.

Women probably appreciate "Fickle" more than the average guy :chuckle: 

I love my 7's, but they don't much care for simple stop and shop cubic zirconia.  Mine demand diamonds...and the higher the quality the better they treat me ;)

mine just shoots federal stuff still havent gotten round to making it custom feed

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2961
  • Location: FL350
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2014, 11:59:47 PM »
I'm picky about accuracy, if a rifle won't shoot at least sub MOA it goes away. And I went the route of having one great rifle vs a couple mediocre rifles for big game. Nothing the 280AI can't do from pronghorn to elk to 500 yards. I have been conflicted on optics because right now it wears an FX3 6x42 which for target shooting handicaps me at any good distance. But on game, which it is a hunting rifle, I don't have any issue.

Factory stuff. Not too bad  ;)


First load with 150 TTSXs. Haven't had time to play with it yet but shows a little potential  :chuckle:


For big game rifles I only care about 3 shot groups

Offline addicted

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 5300
  • Location: A forest near you
  • The famous FootDog
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2014, 01:13:25 AM »
I'm picky about accuracy, if a rifle won't shoot at least sub MOA it goes away. And I went the route of having one great rifle vs a couple mediocre rifles for big game. Nothing the 280AI can't do from pronghorn to elk to 500 yards. I have been conflicted on optics because right now it wears an FX3 6x42 which for target shooting handicaps me at any good distance. But on game, which it is a hunting rifle, I don't have any issue.

Factory stuff. Not too bad  ;)


First load with 150 TTSXs. Haven't had time to play with it yet but shows a little potential  :chuckle:


For big game rifles I only care about 3 shot groups


What's your rate of twist.  Meopta came out with some 6x42's for us guys who like that sort of thing.
"Right now, I am thinking that If my grandmother was here, she would be lecturing me about how there are poor people in Africa, that would just love to have a Ruger, I would just say "Great, granny, lets just ship all the Rugers to Africa!"


Loving life in the Great Northwest one day at a time.

It sounds like it's time to get a new gun.

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2961
  • Location: FL350
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2014, 03:28:41 AM »
1-9 Broughton 5c #4, 24" finished at .660"

If I were to change scopes it would be a VX6 2-12. Just can't bring myself to do it.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2014, 03:39:11 AM by Taco270 »

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2014, 06:25:13 AM »
High country. quick question about parallax. im running a 4.5-14X50 leupold vx-3 on my 300 rum and it has no parallax adjustment. im just curious how it is adjusted or dose it not need to be? like i seen was mentioned and what ive heard before that after 10x it will mess with your shot placement

Most scopes have it set at 100 yards. If you are looking at the target and the gun is not moving, but the reticle walks around as you move your head.......you are seeing parallax. 

Taco, I shoot low power scopes too. I run a zeiss 2-8 with turrets and a #6 iirc it's a thick (.5moa) hair surrounded by thick posts on 3 sides.....not exactly target style, but he'll on game and good enough to make sub moa out to 1100.

Offline b23

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: let's have some actual accuracy discussion. .....
« Reply #30 on: October 30, 2014, 08:14:01 AM »
Some good reads on Parallax and some great discussion on Parallax vs Focus for anyone that is interested.

http://www.longrangehunting.com/articles/what-is-parallax-1.php

http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f18/parallax-vs-focus-1988/

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by pcveen
[Today at 08:18:37 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


In the background by nwwanderer
[Today at 05:33:06 AM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by addicted1
[Yesterday at 09:02:37 PM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


3 pintails by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:20:12 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 12:43:12 PM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 11:09:27 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 10:19:35 AM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 09:55:24 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal