collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves  (Read 84505 times)

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #225 on: April 05, 2015, 07:02:04 PM »
I'm 99% sure I have wolf poop on my ridge, 250 yards from my house......raise your hands, anybody on the westside of the state does, near Seattle. C'mon, raise your hands...anybody ?

And I'm 99% sure this this comment makes no sense  :rolleyes: ... so whats your point?


" this this " makes no sense to me. Explain yours. The westside people who vote for our demise, need wolves in their backyard as well. Pretty simple if you ask me.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 6075
  • IBEW 73 (Retired) Burden on the working class.
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #226 on: April 05, 2015, 07:16:16 PM »
I'm watchin!!!


From what I hear the "Locals" still aren't talkin.     :chuckle:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #227 on: April 05, 2015, 07:56:55 PM »

I'm 99% sure I have wolf poop on my ridge, 250 yards from my house......raise your hands, anybody on the westside of the state does, near Seattle. C'mon, raise your hands...anybody ?

And I'm 99% sure this this comment makes no sense  :rolleyes: ... so whats your point?


" this this " makes no sense to me. Explain yours. The westside people who vote for our demise, need wolves in their backyard as well. Pretty simple if you ask me.

Why? What's simple is that if the wolves want to be over here, they will get here on their own. They sure don't need our help. That's just plain ridiculous.

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #228 on: April 05, 2015, 08:06:41 PM »

I'm 99% sure I have wolf poop on my ridge, 250 yards from my house......raise your hands, anybody on the westside of the state does, near Seattle. C'mon, raise your hands...anybody ?

And I'm 99% sure this this comment makes no sense  :rolleyes: ... so whats your point?


" this this " makes no sense to me. Explain yours. The westside people who vote for our demise, need wolves in their backyard as well. Pretty simple if you ask me.

Why? What's simple is that if the wolves want to be over here, they will get here on their own. They sure don't need our help. That's just plain ridiculous.


Robert,

The wolves didn't want to be here either. They just showed up with some help...and now everybody in government denies it, strange and ridiculous.

Campmeat
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #229 on: April 05, 2015, 08:14:27 PM »

I'm 99% sure I have wolf poop on my ridge, 250 yards from my house......raise your hands, anybody on the westside of the state does, near Seattle. C'mon, raise your hands...anybody ?

And I'm 99% sure this this comment makes no sense  :rolleyes: ... so whats your point?


" this this " makes no sense to me. Explain yours. The westside people who vote for our demise, need wolves in their backyard as well. Pretty simple if you ask me.

Why? What's simple is that if the wolves want to be over here, they will get here on their own. They sure don't need our help. That's just plain ridiculous.


Robert,

The wolves didn't want to be here either. They just showed up with some help...and now everybody in government denies it, strange and ridiculous.

Campmeat

Wrong. The wolves in Washington obviously DID want to be here, since they came here on their own. The wolves that got help are the wolves in Idaho and Montana. Funny how people continue to get confused on that.

Again, for those who aren't aware, there never was a wolf re-introduction in Washington.

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #230 on: April 05, 2015, 08:18:27 PM »
and no elk in the blues either.Not sayin just sayin.
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #231 on: April 05, 2015, 08:20:35 PM »
Bob can you prove that they did not?No,At least no more than we can prove that they did.Why do you think they showed up a few years ago all of a sudden?
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #232 on: April 05, 2015, 08:22:55 PM »
Even if what you say does have some truth to it,If they brought them close to Wa. then they spread to here,In my honest op. I would say they re- introduced them here. period.You are arguing Semantics.
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 6075
  • IBEW 73 (Retired) Burden on the working class.
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #233 on: April 05, 2015, 08:25:27 PM »

Wrong. The wolves in Washington obviously DID want to be here, since they came here on their own. The wolves that got help are the wolves in Idaho and Montana. Funny how people continue to get confused on that.

Again, for those who aren't aware, there never was a wolf re-introduction in Washington.

And you back this statement up with what documented proof?

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #234 on: April 05, 2015, 08:29:07 PM »
http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/gray_wolf/faq.html#1a

From the above link:

Quote
GENERAL INFORMATION

Were wolves re-introduced to Washington?

No. Wolves are returning naturally from dispersing populations in nearby states and provinces. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) never reintroduced or transplanted wolves into Washington, nor has any other state or federal agency.

How did wolves re-populate the West?

In the mid 1990s, the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) re-introduced 66 wolves from Canada into Montana, Wyoming and Idaho – 31 wolves into Yellowstone National Park and 35 into central Idaho. At that time, about 60 wolves were documented in the northwestern corner of Montana (see Map 1). Since then, wolf populations continue to recover throughout the Northern Rocky Mountains, where the USFWS documented more than 287 wolf packs in the 2011 (see Map 2 and Map 3). In fact, populations have recovered to the point that hunting and trapping are now legal in some states. As these wolf populations continue to recover and expand into other areas, it is likely that Washington will experience additional dispersing wolves in the near future.

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 6075
  • IBEW 73 (Retired) Burden on the working class.
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #235 on: April 05, 2015, 08:31:05 PM »
Now thats a reliable source!!!    :chuckle:

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #236 on: April 05, 2015, 08:31:25 PM »
So its just like i said,Semantics bob.The fish and wildlife services did this to us,one way or another.You cant argue that can you?
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #237 on: April 05, 2015, 08:35:58 PM »
My insurance agent saw wolves in the back of a WDFW truck 2 years ago, in Republic Washington. She said the wolves heads were sticking out of boxes they were stuffed in.....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #238 on: April 05, 2015, 08:36:26 PM »
The USFWS brought in the wolves, yes. But not to Washington. Wolves were already present in the state prior to the that anyway.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Washington lawmaker proposes moving wolves
« Reply #239 on: April 05, 2015, 08:37:37 PM »

My insurance agent saw wolves in the back of a WDFW truck 2 years ago, in Republic Washington. She said the wolves heads were sticking out of boxes they were stuffed in.....

Sorry, I don't believe any if those stories. No pictures? It didn't happen.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Gobble Getters Youth Turkey Hunt 2026. 💥 VIDEO💥 by teanawayslayer
[Today at 06:59:30 AM]


Recommendations for AK sitka blacktail by Nate Ortloff
[Today at 05:41:50 AM]


WDFW proposing to Ban Baiting by hunter399
[Today at 03:59:05 AM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 12:28:23 AM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 11:52:04 PM]


Hornady SST saboted bullets (250 grain copper) by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 11:18:05 PM]


First gen M&P trigger question by Aseriousredneck
[Yesterday at 08:36:45 PM]


Replacing the keypad on a gun safe? by Born2late
[Yesterday at 08:33:11 PM]


300 savage 99 f rotary magazine reinstall issue by Bullkllr
[Yesterday at 06:51:04 PM]


Now we wait(Montana) by Wingin it
[Yesterday at 04:24:44 PM]


Your biggest spike elk by elkrack
[Yesterday at 02:55:48 PM]


Looking for Your Help - Donate Used or New Gear by silverdalesauer
[Yesterday at 01:34:19 PM]


Blacktail Trophy Tactics Hunting Event: Free for Veterans/Active Duty by silverdalesauer
[Yesterday at 01:30:57 PM]


1st timer looking for advice. by wadu1
[Yesterday at 01:10:19 PM]


Stop the Coyote "game" classification proposal by Britt-dog
[Yesterday at 11:46:00 AM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by MLhunter1
[Yesterday at 10:39:16 AM]


RV floor repair, have you done it by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:55:02 AM]


Best state for trophy whitetail or Canada? by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 09:08:24 AM]


The Pike fishery that was Pend Oreille River by metlhead
[Yesterday at 08:29:19 AM]


That first elk encounter… by Dan-o
[April 09, 2026, 10:57:16 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal