Free: Contests & Raffles.
Wow, 3 months is a loooong time to wait to get your bull back. I wonder if something happened to your elk, and It took him a while to skim meat from other customers to replace the meat? Could be why you got so little back with cuts/burger that you didn't want and no tenderloins....Just a thought.
THIS GUYS ORIGINAL POST DOESNT MAKE ANY SENSE ....HE SAID THE BULL IN QUARTERS WEIGHED 190 LBS...My 5x5 west side bull this year hung at 440lb. and I got a 59% return (260 lbs of meat back) which is pretty good. You're typically looking for 55-60% return on an animal.WHY WOULD HIS 4 QUARTERS ONLY BE 190 LBS IN THE FIRST PLACE?
Wow! A bull like that... should have got twice as much meat back as what you got. A spike bull I got a few years ago was 160 pounds of mostly boned out meat. The only bone we packed out was the shoulders, which doesn't weigh much. Unless your bull had a ton of blood shot meat or something, I don't see how you could get only 73 pounds of meat. 150 would be more like it.
Quote from: krapmit on January 20, 2015, 11:45:42 AMTHIS GUYS ORIGINAL POST DOESNT MAKE ANY SENSE ....HE SAID THE BULL IN QUARTERS WEIGHED 190 LBS...My 5x5 west side bull this year hung at 440lb. and I got a 59% return (260 lbs of meat back) which is pretty good. You're typically looking for 55-60% return on an animal.WHY WOULD HIS 4 QUARTERS ONLY BE 190 LBS IN THE FIRST PLACE?This is a good point..........
Quote from: bobcat on January 19, 2015, 09:13:11 PMWow! A bull like that... should have got twice as much meat back as what you got. A spike bull I got a few years ago was 160 pounds of mostly boned out meat. The only bone we packed out was the shoulders, which doesn't weigh much. Unless your bull had a ton of blood shot meat or something, I don't see how you could get only 73 pounds of meat. 150 would be more like it.You're not going to get 150 pounds of meat out of 190 pounds of unbutchered elk quarters. About 50% is typical, which should be around 90 pounds. If some of the 90 was spoiled, bloodshot, or dirty then 73 could be reasonable.
Quote from: Bob33 on January 20, 2015, 12:26:28 PMQuote from: bobcat on January 19, 2015, 09:13:11 PMWow! A bull like that... should have got twice as much meat back as what you got. A spike bull I got a few years ago was 160 pounds of mostly boned out meat. The only bone we packed out was the shoulders, which doesn't weigh much. Unless your bull had a ton of blood shot meat or something, I don't see how you could get only 73 pounds of meat. 150 would be more like it.You're not going to get 150 pounds of meat out of 190 pounds of unbutchered elk quarters. About 50% is typical, which should be around 90 pounds. If some of the 90 was spoiled, bloodshot, or dirty then 73 could be reasonable.Depends what kind of quarters we're talking about. I'm pretty sure he said this was with no rib cage or backbone. I'd sure expect to get way more than 50% of the 190.Just going by the size of the bull, it's definitely a big enough elk that I'd expect 150 pounds minimum. That's about what I got from a spike! A large mule deer can yield 73 pounds of meat, which is what he got from a relatively large bull elk!A cow elk I got many years ago was 287 pounds of meat that we got back from the butcher, although if I remember correctly they did not completely debone the meat.
One thing that just occurred to me- why is the butcher being blamed for no tenderloin? If the elk was quartered, and was brought in with no rib cage, the tenderloins would have been removed by the hunter. (As well as the backstrap)
Quote from: bobcat on January 20, 2015, 01:34:40 PMOne thing that just occurred to me- why is the butcher being blamed for no tenderloin? If the elk was quartered, and was brought in with no rib cage, the tenderloins would have been removed by the hunter. (As well as the backstrap)Unless he brought them in with the quarters.