Free: Contests & Raffles.
About 6 million two legged predators in this state. If ungulates are really so detrimental to the ecosystem, then take a few more restrictions off the two leggers. Humans are by far the most efficient and accurate of all choices of predators in nature.Just some wild dreamed bios wanting 'their theory' to push them to the top in either an office or academia.
Keep buying into the cool aid
Informing the ‘misinformed’ about wolveshttp://www.heraldandnews.com/breaking/informing-the-misinformed-about-wolves/article_f7e15630-e381-11e3-811c-0019bb2963f4.html?mode=story
Statewide elk populations are irrelevant to impacts by wolves. When you talk about wolves, you must address areas where they live — not where they don’t. Elk numbers in the Missouri River Breaks of eastern Montana are unaffected by wolves as there are no wolves in that area; it is an apples to oranges comparison.Since the reintroduction of wolves in the mid-1990s, the population of the Northern Yellowstone elk herd is down 80 percent from nearly 20,000 to less than 4,000 today.In the mid-2000s, some biologists claimed the elk population stabilized in the 6,000 plus range, yet since that time the herd dropped another 30 percent in size and is now below the 4,000 mark for the first time ever!See more here: http://bit.ly/1kbZ3zX.The story is similar in central Idaho where the elk population dropped43 percent since 2002. Those are just two examples and there are other pockets with high concentrations of wolves having an effect on elk populations.Having said that, it must be stated wolves are not the sole cause for elk decline, because habitat issues and other predator populations such as mountain lions and bears also come into play, however wolves play an obvious and significant factor in those regions where their numbers are high.However, it is no coincidence elk numbers declined significantly since the 1995 wolf reintroduction. This fact cannot be explained away.