collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 243 vs 17  (Read 17103 times)

Offline kodiak 907

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 1203
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Groups: U.S. Navy/Combat Recon, NRA, DU
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2015, 12:27:12 PM »
I have always had good luck with my 22 wmr. Coyotes, fox, cats, coons. 100 yards or less tho. Shot placement is important with any round IMO.
Spider 2 Y banana

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #16 on: February 16, 2015, 12:41:00 PM »
Look at the 17 WSM, rimfire. Beats the crap out of the 17 HMR, 22 lr and that little fat 17 HMR. Can't think of the name of it off hand.
22 mag is a very, very good choice for coyotes out to 150 yards from my experiences.

All of the above mentioned guns can be bought for under $400 with a scope if you shop around.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2015, 03:10:21 PM »
 :) :)   .17 Remington makes all other 17s look pathetic, 4200 fps easy. BUT small bore fouls easy, heats up, wind blows it around and slows down fast. 243 is far better for real use, but as other said if it is dedicated for coyotes or varmits, 22-250 is wonderful.
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline T Pearce

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 737
  • Location: Great Columbia Basin - Moses Lake
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2015, 03:53:30 PM »
:) :)   .17 Remington makes all other 17s look pathetic, 4200 fps easy. BUT small bore fouls easy, heats up, wind blows it around and slows down fast. 243 is far better for real use, but as other said if it is dedicated for coyotes or varmits, 22-250 is wonderful.
Carl
:yeah:
Pavement, crowds and inaccurate rifles...
Thanks anyway.

JUNK SCIENCE, Never touch the stuff...
If you are reading this, you can now tell your friends that you know someone that drinks Rainier Beer.
Sometimes the main rd.....sometimes the Candy Trail.

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2015, 04:24:30 PM »
I think the OP needs to clarify what 17 he's looking for. We can guess all day, but until he states what it is, there is no need to have the topic.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline Spawnstar

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 223
  • Location: Eltopia
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #20 on: February 16, 2015, 04:41:15 PM »
243 but I don't see to much difference between the 270 and the 243 on coyotes, I would get 223 or 22-250 probably leen more towards 223 just cause ammo is cheap.
Romans 8:28 Semper Fi

Offline fastdam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 876
  • Location: washington
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #21 on: February 16, 2015, 04:56:42 PM »
If he has only one rifle i'm going to assume he doesn't handload.  .223 would probably give him the best variety of factory amunition to choose from. 17 rem will be very limited in ammo selection and may be hard to find locally in some rural places.

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #22 on: February 16, 2015, 05:24:48 PM »
.204 would be a sweet coyote round, but ammo price would be similar to .243 or .270.  Like others said, .223 would probably be the best choice if ammo cost is a factor.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #23 on: February 16, 2015, 05:25:40 PM »
If he has only one rifle i'm going to assume he doesn't handload.  .223 would probably give him the best variety of factory amunition to choose from. 17 rem will be very limited in ammo selection and may be hard to find locally in some rural places.


That's one reason why I've never bought one, even though I reload.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6540
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #24 on: February 16, 2015, 05:27:14 PM »
243 of course. IMO it's the most versatile one mentioned. From sage rats to black bear I use mine for everything
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline JJD

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 959
  • Location: Right side WA state
  • Groups: NRA, DU
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #25 on: February 23, 2015, 07:58:23 AM »
243 of course. IMO it's the most versatile one mentioned. From sage rats to black bear I use mine for everything
:yeah:
Spent most of my $$ on huntin, fishin & retrievin dogs, the rest I just pretty much wasted.

Offline AWS

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1838
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #26 on: February 23, 2015, 08:15:23 AM »
22-250, someday you might realize that everyone of those winter coyotes "you don't care about the fur" is a tank of gas or a winters worth of ammo for coyote hunting.

50 round boxes of 22-250 are pretty reasonable and the White  Box Winchesters actually make a pretty fair coyote load.
After the first shot the rest are just noise.

Make mine a Minaska

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom & Mortgage Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45904
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, OR & GA NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #27 on: February 23, 2015, 09:28:12 AM »
.243. You can use it now to hunt yotes and then pass it on for someone's 1st deer rifle.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5606
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #28 on: February 23, 2015, 09:36:52 AM »
I'd stick to the 270.



The savings in money is an excuse and not reality when it really comes down to it.  If you want to buy a new gun, go for it but it's not going to be about savings.  The best reason to stay with the 270 is it will only make you more confident and comfortable with that rifle.  Its amazing the difference in confidence and feel going from one AR to another.  They all just feel different and take some getting used to as similar as they may look and feel.....they're different.

Can't go wrong with an AR in 223.... but hey...  Whatever scratches the itch!   :twocents:
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Online mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6351
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #29 on: February 23, 2015, 12:50:21 PM »
I'd stick to the 270.



The savings in money is an excuse and not reality when it really comes down to it.  If you want to buy a new gun, go for it but it's not going to be about savings.  The best reason to stay with the 270 is it will only make you more confident and comfortable with that rifle.  Its amazing the difference in confidence and feel going from one AR to another.  They all just feel different and take some getting used to as similar as they may look and feel.....they're different.

Can't go wrong with an AR in 223.... but hey...  Whatever scratches the itch!   :twocents:
true Gringo! As the saying goes, "Beware the man with one gun..He probably knows how to use it!"
Some will say the bullet is more important then the headstamp. Others say it's not so much the bullet, as an fmj will kill anything when we'll placed. And there are those that will claim both, depending on which discussion is taking place. (Can't figure that one out..) :dunno: truth is, it is best to be familiar with, and be accurate with, whatever you are shooting at the time!  :twocents:
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

RMEF Auction by time2hunt
[Today at 12:17:50 PM]


Discretion !!! by Ghost Hunter
[Today at 12:13:30 PM]


Problems w logging onto WDFW? by trophyhunt
[Today at 12:10:46 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by SkookumHntr
[Today at 11:44:14 AM]


CCW response to FWC Melanie Rowland's op-ed by timberfaller
[Today at 11:05:25 AM]


Your biggest spike elk by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 09:59:11 AM]


Big Changes for USFS by nwmein199
[Today at 09:07:09 AM]


Stop the Coyote "game" classification proposal by Green Tree
[Today at 08:34:42 AM]


No 4-1 fools joke. by Henrydog
[Today at 05:06:28 AM]


Stick with the 50's by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:39:34 PM]


What to do?? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:16:12 PM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 08:10:13 PM]


Bills to relocate Bob Oke and continue pheasant release programs by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 04:13:03 PM]


Where to buy beef? by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 03:16:48 PM]


Back to the Pack - Hunting backpack suggestions by Dark2Dark
[Yesterday at 03:11:34 PM]


Small plastic boats? by slm9s
[Yesterday at 10:56:47 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal