collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Keeping the other thread pure and simple, would you change this boundary line,  where to and why?

Leave it be
24 (61.5%)
Move it to I-5, westside
7 (17.9%)
Other, specify
5 (12.8%)
Other, break it up into sub catagories
3 (7.7%)

Total Members Voted: 39

Author Topic: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA  (Read 9747 times)

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5607
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2015, 03:02:36 PM »
Sundance,
I realize it is a touchy issue.  It makes the guys who hunt in the ferns mad at bigger buck with a pine tree in the background. 

I get that.  I also see it as another wedge between hunters....we just can't seem to help ourselves.


That being said, I respect you for setting this thread off to the side as you could see a storm coming.  Personally, I don't care as I sit in E. Wa and IMO the bucks just east of the PWT aren't hardly worth harvesting   :twocents:
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Offline shanevg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 2398
  • Location: L-Town (Lynden), WA
    • https://www.facebook.com/shanevg
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2015, 03:52:29 PM »
If CA bucks are considered blacktails, then anything west of PCT should be considered a blacktail. 

Here is the B&C boundary - it's clear as mud.  Seriously though a Mt. Baker Wilderness buck being the same category as a north CA buck seems ridiculous.

Washington — Beginning at the Washington-British Columbia border, the boundary line runs south along the west boundary of North Cascades National Park to the range line between R10E and R11E, Willamette Meridian, which is then followed directly south to its intersection with the township line between T18N and T17N, which is then followed westward until it connects with the north border of Mt. Rainier National Park, then along the north, west and south park boundaries until it intersects with the range line between R9E and R10E, Willamette Meridian, which is then followed directly south to the Columbia River near Cook.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2015, 04:01:14 PM by shanevg »

Offline Okanagan

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 706
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2015, 04:29:18 PM »
If CA bucks are considered blacktails... 


California blacktails are slightly smaller class of mule deer.  They don't look like blacktails, don't act like blacktails and are not rain deer blacktails.  I have lived in California and hunted them.  To class them with I.e. Olympic Peninsula blacktails is ridiculous.  That's always been a peeve of mine. 

The problem is that the deer walk back and forth across any line we draw to separate mule deer and blacktails, especially bucks in the rut looking for does.  Crossbreeds/hybrids are the rule for miles on both sides of the line.  I think the rule makers have tried to err to the west and keep mule deer genes out of the blacktail record book more than the other way.  That makes for many fine bucks with big racks in the North Cascades that are excluded from the blacktail records and yet have no chance whatsoever at the mule deer book.  We enjoy hunting them anyway, and know that a big old mature buck is a trophy, especially if he is about as big as deer get in his area, whether that is book size or not.  Island blacktails come to mind-- not a ghost of a chance at record book size but fine bucks -- on a smaller scale.   

I know of two areas, one in WA and one in BC where I have seen what looks like pure blacktails and pure mule deer a few minutes and a few yards apart.  Both of them may have been purebreds and both may have been hybrids.  No way to tell short of DNA maybe and somehow that feels like overkill science rather than hunting.  In those areas over the years we've seen every kind of blended physical features, especially noticeable on the rump and tail.  I wish I'd taken a  photo of four deer together miles west of the Crest Trail.  Each of them had distinctly different rump and tail markings, from close to pure blacktail to pure mule deer with two in the middle part way between. 

The problem is clear but not a solution.  I kind of like the benchleg or Cascade class of bucks for hybrids, at least to recognize outstanding examples. 




Offline fishnfur

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 3805
  • Location: longview
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2015, 05:17:49 PM »
Nicely said, and I concur completely.  Having a standard for benchleg bucks makes total sense to those of you who hunt the areas where that strain of animal exists.   
“When I die, I want to die like my grandfather who died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like all the passengers in his car.”  - Will Rogers

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12854
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #19 on: August 18, 2015, 07:29:36 PM »
The fact that people feel the need to argue about this is retarded   :twocents:

I see it as more of a discussion then an argument. There will not be a consensus, nor will the issue probably ever be resolved. I don't see the harm in some civil debate. No one is trying to ban anything.
Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12854
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #20 on: August 18, 2015, 07:46:40 PM »
Sundance,
I realize it is a touchy issue.  It makes the guys who hunt in the ferns mad at bigger buck with a pine tree in the background. 

I get that.  I also see it as another wedge between hunters....we just can't seem to help ourselves.


That being said, I respect you for setting this thread off to the side as you could see a storm coming. Personally, I don't care as I sit in E. Wa and IMO the bucks just east of the PWT aren't hardly worth harvesting   :twocents:

This is what we are talking about and it goes both ways. Those "mulies" are smaller and "hardly worth harvesting"  just east of the PCT yet that same buck walks a few yards over the PCT to the west side and all of the sudden he is a masher Blacktail. No matter what side he is standing on he is the same deer. But he could be passed off as 2 different sub-species I find that kind of ridiculous. There are Blacktails there are Mulies and there are Bench leg/hybrids. I don't know why people get offended when their buck is called a bench leg. Bench leg is not a derogatory name. It takes nothing away from the beauty nor the size of the animal. It's simply calling it what it actually is. I wouldn't go over to Republic and shoot a big ole mulie and try to pass it off as a Blacktail. That would be ridiculous and inaccurate. I wouldn't go to Forks and shoot a masher blacktail and call it a mule deer. That would be ridiculous and inaccurate. So why not call a bench leg/hybrid what it actually is? Why do people get offended when you call a deer that is from an area of heavy hybridization a hybrid? I don't get it.
Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12854
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #21 on: August 18, 2015, 08:00:24 PM »
Here is a picture of a mule deer doe 34 miles (as a crow flies) west of the PCT.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2015, 08:07:54 PM by grundy53 »
Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline erk444

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 1238
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2015, 09:57:39 PM »
Is that in Hancock :yike:

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12854
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2015, 11:59:23 PM »
Is that in Hancock :yike:
Yes

Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk

Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline fishnfur

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 3805
  • Location: longview
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #24 on: August 19, 2015, 12:36:52 PM »
Good points and pic Grundy. 

It's interesting that WDFW has no separation between species when reporting a successful hunt, as they do for salmon.   If it is west of the PCT - it's a blacktail.  East, it's a muley.
“When I die, I want to die like my grandfather who died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like all the passengers in his car.”  - Will Rogers

Offline kodiak 907

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 1202
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Groups: U.S. Navy/Combat Recon, NRA, DU
Re: Boundary Line for Columbian Blacktail deer in WA
« Reply #25 on: August 21, 2015, 07:47:18 AM »
Nice capture! Thanks for posting  :tup:
Spider 2 Y banana

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Oregon special tag info by 3dvapor
[Today at 08:41:30 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Antlershed
[Today at 08:02:14 AM]


Idaho Mt goat draft plan by time2hunt
[Today at 07:59:04 AM]


Cougar Problems Toroda Creek Road Near Bodie by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:52:17 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:50:00 AM]


Disabled Fishing License by Blacklab
[Today at 07:44:43 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by jackelope
[Today at 07:18:59 AM]


Missoula Fishing by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:30:10 PM]


Buck age by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:08:41 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Tbar
[Yesterday at 10:55:37 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 07:36:21 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 07:28:59 PM]


where is everyone? by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 05:12:26 PM]


Guessing there will be a drop in whitatail archers by hunter399
[Yesterday at 12:05:49 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal