collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Do you support a tax structure that encourages open public access for outdoor recreation on timber lands?

Yes
70 (76.1%)
No
22 (23.9%)

Total Members Voted: 92

Author Topic: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.  (Read 35871 times)

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44687
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #90 on: August 01, 2013, 02:13:48 PM »
There needs to be something added to give this thing its' proper direction otherwise we'll pass it and the state will send a letter out saying "sure wish you would open your gates" and that will be it.

How to phrase something specific enough to get the needed results without creating a negative ripple.

Oh, and I have a buddy who works for Weyerhaeuser. According to him, we're already being watched by corporate here at this website.

Good. I hope they change their tune before they lose money. Opening their lands back up to all would be a good move that would squash this immediately.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #91 on: August 01, 2013, 02:42:24 PM »
It is unfortunate that it too WEYCO jumping in on the lease and permit game to get people to really start discussing the issues of timber companies locking out the public.  But I guess that is how it goes.  How long has Rayonier, Hancock, etc. been charging?  :dunno:

Just wait until WEYCO implements the fee program and locks out most people from St. Helens.  That is when the ___ will really hit the fan. :twocents:
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #92 on: August 02, 2013, 05:24:12 PM »
My intent with this conversation is to try and bring in as many ideas and you as possible.

What if the rates stay the same right now; Freeze them. Then, offer a lower rate for timberlands offering public access? That way, nobody can twist this around to say we are forcing public access on someone.

I would be for that. Make it an incentive NOT a penalty.
Problem is, the system is already an incentive, and everyone else is already subsidizing the industry.  So now we are going to subsidize them more?  I would support lowering the tax value for industrial timberland (5,000+) acres that allows free public access if the difference was made up by the other industrial timberland companies that do charge or do not allow access--that way the overall tax brought in doesn't go up, and our subsidy doesn't increase.
How are we subsidizing them? 

From my County:
If land is approved for classification in the Current Use Open Space Program, it is then taxed according to its current use rather than its highestand best use. The Assessor’s Office keeps a dual roll for these properties—
one indicating the true market value of the property and one for the
taxable (or Current Use) value. This reduction in taxable value causes a tax
shift when applying the levy formula:
Total District Levy ÷ Total Value in the District = Levy Rate
Taxing Districts still collect their full levy, but since it is collected on a
reduced taxable value, a portion of the tax obligation for the district is
shifted to the other taxpayers within the district. In other words, the same
total tax is collected, but the rate is a little higher for everyone because of
the reduction in value. 

It's gets worse  if you think about it.  Timberland is now an "investment" with many groups not interested in trees, so much as the selling value of "flipping timberland".If timberland "fair market values" increase based on recent sales, then the difference between "fair marked value" and "current use value" gets bigger, thus increasing timberlands tax break.  The tax generated on this value difference is then shifted to other taxpayers like homeowners and businesses.  The distance between the current use and the FMV increase, thus increasing the shift.  It's ironic--timberland flipping gets more profitable due to the interest of TIMO's, REITS and foreign investors, which raises the true overall values in a county,  but the current use value on timberland stays the same, so the tax break gets larger and is then shifted homeowners!  EEEEKKKK.  What a system!
« Last Edit: October 13, 2013, 08:36:50 AM by fireweed »

Offline steelhead

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 5
  • Location: Shelton
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #93 on: August 14, 2013, 07:49:04 PM »
First thing, thank you fireweed for the insight.  This topic has motivated me to register, create, and post after "lurking" for years.  Timber companies have been reducing the amount of open land for years without much orginized protest from hunters.  The hunter, hikers and environmentalists finally have something in common: losing access.  I believe and strongly support higher taxes to any timber company that elects to live under the pretence of private property.  If Weyco, Rayonier, Green Diamond, ect... choose to charge for access to thier "private property" then inturn they should be taxed as such.  This is a win-win, the general fund will be in surplus and parents will be able to show their sons and daughters the lands they grew up hunting, hiking or exploring.  If nothing else, the timber company's greed is bringing all outdoor groups together in addition to the citizens who will support a tax raise that is not on their backs.  Show the public the initiative and we will sign!   :)  :twocents:

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25033
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #94 on: August 14, 2013, 09:13:01 PM »
I have not voted yet... I can say i had a VERY interesting talk with my brother about the new rules for the WYCO land in the skagit county area that was Longview Fiber land. I can NO LONGER ride with him to his work site. Unless you are an employee you are NOT allowed in a vehicle first offense is the banishment of the employee from WYCO land... IE cannot work there any longer. There are several "Zero Tolerence" polices that are BS That is just one of them. IMO if you want to exclude ANYONE from your property that is ok but i will be looking into the tax status more in depth after hearing about WYCO's  management coming near me.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8810
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #95 on: August 14, 2013, 09:39:47 PM »
It's gets worse  if you think about it.  Timberland is now an "investment" with many groups not interested in trees, so much as the selling value of "flipping timberland".If timberland "fair market values" increase based on recent sales, then the county's pot gets bigger, and they can collect more tax--most of which is then shifted to other taxpayers like homeowners and businesses.  The distance between the current use and the FMV increase, thus increasing the shift.  It's ironic--timberland flipping gets more profitable due to the interest of TIMO's, REITS and foreign investors, which raises the overall values in a county, allowing the collection of more tax, which is then shifted homeowners!  EEEEKKKK.  What a system!

I think Weyco, Hancock, Plum Creek and just about everybody else are now REIT's

Offline Northway

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 469
  • Location: Seattle
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #96 on: August 15, 2013, 10:06:08 AM »
It's gets worse  if you think about it.  Timberland is now an "investment" with many groups not interested in trees, so much as the selling value of "flipping timberland".If timberland "fair market values" increase based on recent sales, then the county's pot gets bigger, and they can collect more tax--most of which is then shifted to other taxpayers like homeowners and businesses.  The distance between the current use and the FMV increase, thus increasing the shift.  It's ironic--timberland flipping gets more profitable due to the interest of TIMO's, REITS and foreign investors, which raises the overall values in a county, allowing the collection of more tax, which is then shifted homeowners!  EEEEKKKK.  What a system!

I think Weyco, Hancock, Plum Creek and just about everybody else are now REIT's

REIT's have to distribute 90% of income to shareholders. It's maximizing shareholder value in its purest form, with a greater emphasis on short-term profits. They would ditch most of their existing employees in a heartbeat if there was even a slightly more profitable short-term use for their timberlands, IMO. 
Which side are you on if neither will claim you?

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #97 on: August 16, 2013, 08:55:55 AM »
Wisconsin's program there is a considerable tax reduction for managed forests if the land is open to hunting etc at no charge:
"If landowners want the maximum tax break, they must open the land to hunting, fishing, hiking, cross-country skiing and sightseeing. If they do, they pay 67 cents per acre each year on land enrolled before 2005 or $1.67 per acre of land enrolled that year and thereafter.

Landowners can avoid the public access requirement by paying a higher rate of $8.34 per acre, shrinking their tax break."
(Wisconsin's situation isn't parallel to what we are proposing since even very small parcels in Wisconsin are enrolled, and we are only targeting industrial  5000 acre plus landowners, but directly tying full tax break to public access has been done.  This article talks about how it's hard to find these small parcels enrolled.  Keep in mind the current property tax paid on timberland in Washington is less than $2 per acre per year as you read this article).


http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/state-programs-open-hunting-land-tough-to-find-io6kuag-169914196.html

Offline Goshawk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 602
  • Location: Lewis County
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #98 on: October 20, 2013, 08:50:56 AM »
After this hunting season, I wonder how much more support this will generate.

One of the side effects that has occurred, is Weyerhaeuser has effectively land locked MANY privately held and other corporate lands from hunters who had permission to hunt, but did not purchase permission.

Lots of folks just went from "Not my problem, I hunt X Lumber Co. Lands, or Old Man George's Place" to standing outside a locked gate being told they can't even walk into their old non Weyerhaeuser stomping grounds.
You'll never get a Big'un if you keep shooting Little'un's.

Offline Goshawk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 602
  • Location: Lewis County
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #99 on: November 09, 2015, 09:29:06 PM »
Been a long time since I updated this, but my efforts in Olympia fell on deaf ears.  Nobody, and I mean Nobody wants to take on Weyerhaeuser.

If progress is going to be made, it will only occure at the "boots level" not out of a movement in Olympia.

Anyone here young enough and educated enough to know how to get this rolling online?
You'll never get a Big'un if you keep shooting Little'un's.

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44687
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #100 on: November 10, 2015, 06:15:58 AM »
WEYCO has both sides of the aisle deep in their pockets. Thank you for trying.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Citizen's Initiative for timber tax rate change.
« Reply #101 on: November 10, 2015, 01:01:30 PM »
Been a long time since I updated this, but my efforts in Olympia fell on deaf ears.  Nobody, and I mean Nobody wants to take on Weyerhaeuser.

If progress is going to be made, it will only occure at the "boots level" not out of a movement in Olympia.

Anyone here young enough and educated enough to know how to get this rolling online?

Ran into the same thing with my state reps from SW Washington.  I am going to try the governor--if we are going to have a democrat might as well see if he is willing to take on corporate welfare.  All we need is a legislative review of the current system--to see if it is still working for the people.  There are a few other states that could work as models: Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and Maine.  In these states the lowest current use values are tied to public access, with a 20-25% additional reduction in the value (that the tax is then calculated on) if the land is open to public access.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 Draw Results by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:02:27 AM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by tvandy45
[Today at 06:32:20 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Rugergunsite308
[Today at 06:27:17 AM]


Bow mount trolling motors by CP
[Today at 06:03:13 AM]


SE raffle tags holder by HntnFsh
[Today at 05:39:57 AM]


11th Annual 'Pull For Scouting' Clay Crushing Classic by high_hunter
[Today at 12:27:18 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by high_hunter
[Today at 12:21:33 AM]


Ritzville Rifle Buck - GMU 284 by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 11:49:16 PM]


Antlerless Moose more than once? by shootem
[Yesterday at 11:25:51 PM]


Nooksack Muzzleloader Bull Tag by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:42:24 PM]


My wife drew quality deer DESERT rifle 10/18-10/26!!!!! by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:17:15 PM]


Palouse buck deer by blumtnelkndeer
[Yesterday at 10:14:00 PM]


Drew Quality by Jimmer
[Yesterday at 09:34:00 PM]


Nevada guide draw Mule Deer by Beastmonger1987
[Yesterday at 09:33:34 PM]


Quality Swakane by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 09:09:17 PM]


Observatory quality bull rifle by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 09:00:02 PM]


Anterless 1334 muzzle loader by Bdawg
[Yesterday at 08:46:31 PM]


A little Martini Cadet varmint rifle I have been working on by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 08:43:33 PM]


Pogue Quality by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 08:38:35 PM]


2025 OILS! by HUNTNORTHWEST
[Yesterday at 07:46:27 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal