collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 594 and muzzleloader purchase  (Read 15718 times)

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21855
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2015, 12:51:36 PM »
Actually you can do a background check on a black powder gun.  The federal form 4473 only asks if it is a hand gun, a long gun, or other.
I believe his point is that according to Federal law, a black power gun is not considered a firearm.

https://www.atf.gov/file/61721/download
"Thus, a muzzle loading weapon that meets the definition of an “antique firearm” is not a firearm and may lawfully be received and possessed by a prohibited person under the GCA."
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline cowboycraig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2013
  • Posts: 919
  • Location: Seattle
    • What is an Operator?
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2015, 01:16:10 PM »
What if it is THIS Muzzleloader?


Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39215
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2015, 01:21:11 PM »
A scope and bipod doesn't change anything.

Offline luvmystang67

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2313
  • Location: Coeur d'Alene
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2015, 01:26:21 PM »
What if it is THIS Muzzleloader?



yeah, that is an assault muzzy. You will need an AOW NFA stamp for that bad boy.  The forward vertical grip gives you a huge "SUPER SCARY" advantage over the deer and that tacti-cool scope mount ought to be illegal everywhere.  The bipod and front weapons light really enhance its assault-ability.  I like the way you've streamlined by removing the ramrod, but in this case, less is more as in "MORE ASSAULT" as you've streamlined the weapon.  Now that you've chosen to remove this primitive tool, that ramrod "LUG" up front should be removed to bring it IN LINE (pun) with assault muzzleloader regulations.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21855
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2015, 01:27:53 PM »
What if it is THIS Muzzleloader?


If it meets the following definition, it is considered an “antique firearm” and is not subject to Gun Control Act requirements as far as the ATF is concerned:

“any muzzle loading rifle, muzzle loading shotgun, or muzzle loading pistol, which is designed to use black powder, or a black powder substitute, and which cannot use fixed ammunition. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “antique firearm” shall not include any weapon which incorporates a firearm frame or receiver, any firearm which is converted into a muzzle loading weapon, or any muzzle loading weapon which can be readily converted to fire fixed ammunition by replacing the barrel, bolt, breechblock, or any combination thereof.”
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9012
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #20 on: December 22, 2015, 03:04:49 PM »
I think Craig was just pulling everybody's leg with the "tactical muzzleloader"  :chuckle:
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline cowboycraig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2013
  • Posts: 919
  • Location: Seattle
    • What is an Operator?
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #21 on: December 22, 2015, 03:17:56 PM »
I think Craig was just pulling everybody's leg with the "tactical muzzleloader"  :chuckle:

Ya pretty much.

Offline cbond3318

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 3289
  • Location: Idaho
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #22 on: December 22, 2015, 03:32:04 PM »
That Assault Muzzy is scary. Although not practical in a Zombie Apocalypse......too heavy.
Just tend your own and live.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14561
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #23 on: December 22, 2015, 03:45:36 PM »
The antis would probably try to ban speed loaders for that scary muzzleloader.

Offline usmc74

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1380
  • Location: North Bend
  • Groups: NRA (Life), RMEF, SAF (Life), American Legion (Life), Master Hunter
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2015, 05:05:10 AM »
I have a muzzleloader that has a bayonet mount...Shhhhhh

Offline lee

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 555
  • Location: Lacey
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #25 on: December 23, 2015, 06:21:05 AM »
Does a FFL transfer have to happen for the purchase of an inline muzzleloader now that 594 passed?

Technically, "yes" it does...... and "technically" this also applies to the transfer(sale) of concrete nail guns that use a 22rf blanks, also flare guns for your boat, also some fireworks...... based on how 594 so loosely defined a "firearm". Obviously though ... no... NICS are not being performed on these transfers.

Interestingly, one full year since 594 passed, not 1 person has been cited statewide....

Lee

Offline steeleywhopper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1682
  • Location: Snohomish co.
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #26 on: December 23, 2015, 08:55:50 PM »
I called a local place that does FFL transfers and he said that no transfer needed for muzzleloaders.
Politicians like Jay Inslee are the reason we have the 2nd Amendment

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39215
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #27 on: December 23, 2015, 09:04:54 PM »
I called a local place that does FFL transfers and he said that no transfer needed for muzzleloaders.

Yep. They will tell you that. Like I said before, the law is being ignored.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21855
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 594 and muzzleloader purchase
« Reply #28 on: December 23, 2015, 09:06:55 PM »
I called a local place that does FFL transfers and he said that no transfer needed for muzzleloaders.
I wouldn't want to be the first one to have that tested in court. :twocents:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

MT B tag by Dan-o
[Today at 12:09:37 AM]


Idaho unit 10A by Pnwrider
[Yesterday at 11:42:18 PM]


New scope or not? by Angus
[Yesterday at 10:56:22 PM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Kc_Kracker
[Yesterday at 10:00:40 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 09:59:31 PM]


2025 Canning by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 09:24:02 PM]


Huck 121 Youth Elk by Parkern
[Yesterday at 07:50:13 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:49:13 PM]


Drew A Bull Moose Tag - 49 Degrees North A, Late hunt NOV 1st- NOV 30th by Jimmer
[Yesterday at 07:45:11 PM]


Two stories for you (no deer were harmed in the making) by 3boys
[Yesterday at 06:54:14 PM]


Quality deer hunt by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 05:57:43 PM]


Willipa Hills Antlerless tag by GOcougsHunter
[Yesterday at 05:35:58 PM]


Going to try my hand at calling. by craigapphunt
[Yesterday at 05:24:50 PM]


Share your out of state experience by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 04:45:31 PM]


Fishin' with First-Timers by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 04:16:36 PM]


Any buck clarification by Rugergunsite308
[Yesterday at 04:04:47 PM]


More than one shotgun? by goldenhtr
[Yesterday at 03:29:15 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 01:29:56 PM]


How do you scout for small game? by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 01:15:23 PM]


Opening Day Ducks - Why Surface Drives by Delta Duckman
[Yesterday at 12:11:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal