Free: Contests & Raffles.
Not sure how well this would work but what about giving a person 2-3 units to which their tags are good for and also limit the amount of hunters in certain gmu's that are below objectives? This wouldn't take away from a hunter wanting to hunt both sides but could help some of the struggling herds by limiting the pressure...
I don't think we should have to choose sides of the state for deer or elk. WE by Washington hunting licenses. They should be good for Washington.
Quote from: HntnFsh on October 31, 2016, 08:43:18 AMI don't think we should have to choose sides of the state for deer or elk. WE by Washington hunting licenses. They should be good for Washington.
Quote from: Jason on October 31, 2016, 09:38:52 AMQuote from: HntnFsh on October 31, 2016, 08:43:18 AMI don't think we should have to choose sides of the state for deer or elk. WE by Washington hunting licenses. They should be good for Washington. I understand this mindset but I personally am ok with "taking one for the team" with regards to deer numbers and overall health. A person could still hunt every year but just would have to decide where.