I imagine plenty of people have already taken a 7MM Rem Mag down to 6.5 MM, but that would be pretty cool......
Winchester did that back in 1959. .264 Win Mag.
And it became a legend as a barrel burner. The velocity was to fast at around 3400 FPS, barrels did not last long and they were shot out.
I don't know if you ever owned a .264 as it doesn't seem so. People used to talk about how the .220 Swift burned out barrels and how bad the .17's fouled. Most of the talkers never owned one.
At one time I had 3 .264's. Two pre-64 Model 70's and 1 Remington 700 Classic. I don't know where Winchester got their velocities that the original claims were based on. Later the published velocities were revised downwards. The 140 grain ended up with a published velocity of 3030 fps, downwards from the original 3200 fps. I do not know where the 100 grain factory load ended up. Originally it was at 3600 fps.
Any high powder capacity, overbore cartridge has the potential to burn out barrels. Even a .223 will burn out throats if the shooter gets it hot enough.
If I had to do it all over again instead of a .264 I would have purchased a 7mm Rem Mag as there was lots better bullet choices in the past. Now it doesn't seem to matter what caliber one has. There are lots of options and premium bullets available.