Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Advocacy, Agencies, Access
»
HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
Advertisement
Poll
Are you in favor of this bill?
Yes
No
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries (Read 6143 times)
csaaphill
Anti Hunters are weird animals.
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 9611
Hunting is non-negotiable it's what I do!
Groups: G.O.A., Rocky Mountain ELk Foundation
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #15 on:
February 27, 2017, 11:34:28 PM »
YEs and yes anything that helps gain access without fricking having to pay YES!
Logged
"When my bow falls, so shall the world. When me heart ceases to pump blood to my body, it will all come crashing down. As a hunter, we are bound by duty, nay, bound by our very soul to this world. When a hunter dies we feel it, we sense it, and the world trembles with sorrow. When I die, so shall the world, from the shock of loosing such a great part of ones soul." Ezekiel, Okeanos Hunter
Advertise Here
bigtex
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Explorer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10657
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #16 on:
June 08, 2017, 03:20:33 PM »
This legislation passed and will take effect July 23. It went thru several modifications the new law will essentially say "that payments to a landowner from state, local, or nonprofit organizations established under cooperative public access agreements with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife are not considered "fees" for the purpose of the outdoor recreation immunity provision as long as the landowner does not charge for access to the land subject to the cooperative
agreement." So those landowners would not be liable for accidents on their lands.
The staunch Tea Party members in the House were the only ones opposed to the bill.
Logged
Special T
Truth the new Hate Speech.
Business Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
+13
)
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 25060
Location: Skagit Valley
Make it Rain!
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #17 on:
June 08, 2017, 03:26:30 PM »
What was their reasoning? Tea party?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Logged
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.
Confucius
KFhunter
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 34512
Location: NE Corner
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #18 on:
June 08, 2017, 03:28:29 PM »
They should apply this to all landowners regardless of an agreement with WDFW. Someone wants to go fishing and asks politely, landowner says no because they've got an ornery bull on pasture (example)
Logged
Special T
Truth the new Hate Speech.
Business Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
+13
)
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 25060
Location: Skagit Valley
Make it Rain!
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #19 on:
June 08, 2017, 03:33:37 PM »
Ok that explanation makes sense to me.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Logged
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.
Confucius
bigtex
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Explorer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10657
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #20 on:
June 08, 2017, 03:33:53 PM »
Quote from: Special T on June 08, 2017, 03:26:30 PM
What was their reasoning? Tea party?
Because they oppose everything
But in all seriousness Shea and Taylor are typically against anything government related, so I'm sure they don't like WDFW giving private landowners $. There were two other representatives who voted against it. Shea and Taylor are the WA Tea Party biggest/most famous legislators in Olympia. In comparison, there was no opposition to the bill in the Senate.
Logged
Special T
Truth the new Hate Speech.
Business Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
+13
)
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 25060
Location: Skagit Valley
Make it Rain!
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #21 on:
June 08, 2017, 03:43:43 PM »
Well I think an exemption is good, but I also understand why one would try and make a stand tonprotect ones property rights.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Logged
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself.
Confucius
csaaphill
Anti Hunters are weird animals.
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 9611
Hunting is non-negotiable it's what I do!
Groups: G.O.A., Rocky Mountain ELk Foundation
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #22 on:
June 20, 2017, 01:01:48 AM »
So... how's this going?
Logged
"When my bow falls, so shall the world. When me heart ceases to pump blood to my body, it will all come crashing down. As a hunter, we are bound by duty, nay, bound by our very soul to this world. When a hunter dies we feel it, we sense it, and the world trembles with sorrow. When I die, so shall the world, from the shock of loosing such a great part of ones soul." Ezekiel, Okeanos Hunter
dreamunelk
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2049
Re: HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
«
Reply #23 on:
June 21, 2017, 06:24:02 PM »
Signed into law.
Logged
Advertise Here
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
All
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Advocacy, Agencies, Access
»
HB 1464 Would Allow Private Landowners to be Exempt from User Injuries
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt
by
zwickeyman
[
Yesterday
at 10:07:12 PM]
Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
by
Dan-o
[
Yesterday
at 09:48:27 PM]
GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate)
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Yesterday
at 09:36:40 PM]
FS Surbu BFG 50
by
Tacticalhammer
[
Yesterday
at 09:36:18 PM]
Pack wheel
by
millerwheeler
[
Yesterday
at 09:26:47 PM]
E WA waterfowl guide
by
92xj
[
Yesterday
at 09:13:44 PM]
Where do the bulls go?
by
TeacherMan
[
Yesterday
at 09:04:39 PM]
Anyone use game carts?
by
bigdub257
[
Yesterday
at 08:55:58 PM]
Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Yesterday
at 08:55:31 PM]
Bearpaw Season 2025
by
kramman
[
Yesterday
at 08:51:05 PM]
Mushroom ID Thread
by
MLHSN
[
Yesterday
at 08:50:05 PM]
No upland with dog during deer and elk season?
by
buglebuster
[
Yesterday
at 08:22:23 PM]
Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics
by
ganghis
[
Yesterday
at 07:11:45 PM]
2025 blacktail rut thread
by
swanderek
[
Yesterday
at 07:01:53 PM]
West side antler buyers
by
trophyhunt
[
Yesterday
at 06:18:29 PM]
2025 deer, let's see em!
by
bigmacc
[
Yesterday
at 03:45:16 PM]
Mt. St. Helens Goat
by
Gonehuntin01
[
Yesterday
at 03:23:04 PM]
My new BB Gun
by
JDHasty
[
Yesterday
at 02:41:00 PM]
Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat
by
Boss .300 winmag
[
Yesterday
at 02:11:14 PM]
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case
by
Tbar
[
Yesterday
at 01:43:14 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal