collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Reduced power loads, the right way  (Read 1267 times)

Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Reduced power loads, the right way
« on: March 19, 2017, 09:18:31 PM »
While loading up ammo for next weekend's expansion test, I thought a few people may be interested in how I come up with my reduced velocity loads to simulate LR impacts. I've seen more than a few very sketchy reduced loads posted that simply reduced the powder charge listed in a book or using pistol powder. There's an easier and safer way if you have the right tools available.

Right off the bat I'll say that Quickload is a great tool if you know how to use it properly. It can also get people into a whole lot of trouble if they aren't careful. The basic rule of "garbage in, garbage out" applies here! This is the basic process I used to come up with reduced velocity load for a 300gr bullet in the 338/375 Ruger Striker.

The first step is to select the projectile and chambering that I'm working with. This is also where I enter all the specifics such as COAL and barrel length. Here I've chosen the Berger 300gr OTM to be loaded in the 338/375 Ruger as well as entering in the 18" barrel length of the pistol.


The next step is to figure out what powders will give a low muzzle velocity while providing a good case fill. This is important; just reducing a powder charge from a load manual can result in squib loads or possible powder detonation cause by improper ignition from the primer. The general rule that I follow is to use a powder that would normally be considered too slow for this application. The slower powder will typically take up more space in the case and give a good case fill. I like to keep fill levels above 80%. Here I've selected the burn rate range as well as target velocity and fill ratios.


Now Quickload has generated a list of potential powders that fall within the parameters I've selected. This list will show expected fill ratios, pressures and velocities at a specific powder charge. Here I'll review the list and see what powders I have on hand that will work. I'm going to go with H-1000 for this application.


The next step is to take the powder that I want to use and select a charge weight. I can either let Quickload generate a chart of predicted charges with my selected powder or I can choose the charge myself. I already had a pretty good idea what charge weight I'd use so I just entered 70.0gr of H-1000 for a fill ratio of about 93%.


The last step is to review the predicted results from my powder charge selection. Here I'm looking for a specific velocity while staying within a safe pressure range. If the predicted velocity isn't what I want, I'll adjust the powder charge while still watching both pressure and fill ratio. If I can't get the numbers I want I'll just move on to a new powder.


The last step is to load up a few test rounds and give it a go. It's important to understand that Quickload gives predictions, not load data. Once you get a feel for how to properly apply the info you get though, it's a great tool. My results are typically within about 50fps of the predictions. Since every barrel is a little different though the results always vary a bit. I will usually take the data I get from Quickload and then cross reference it with other data from either past loads or from load manuals just to get addition info.

Offline Todd_ID

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 2926
  • Location: Clarkston
  • Hunt Hard!
Re: Reduced power loads, the right way
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2017, 09:33:18 PM »

Exceptional write up!
Bring a GPS!  It's awkward to have to eat your buddies!

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18067
Re: Reduced power loads, the right way
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2017, 09:37:07 PM »
Great share.     :tup:
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5601
Re: Reduced power loads, the right way
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2017, 10:13:51 PM »
I was reading about detonation on reduced loads the other day and wondered if you knew what you were doing - obviously no worries! Thanks for writeup!

Offline CaNINE

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 1422
  • Location: Gig Harbor
Re: Reduced power loads, the right way
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2017, 06:46:41 AM »
Thanks for sharing this info. I used this quickload method when developing a low recoil deer load for my 12 year old daughters 7mm-08. Stuffed the case with US869 seated with a ABLR running at 1980 MV. Very low recoil and worked excellent on the whitetail.
The lazy do not roast any game, but the diligent feed on the riches of the hunt.

Proverbs 12:27

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Archery Elk Advice by PsoasHunter
[Yesterday at 11:29:00 PM]


Share your out of state experience by dvolmer
[Yesterday at 11:05:49 PM]


Baker Lake Sockeye 2025 by RB
[Yesterday at 09:21:30 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:52:27 PM]


Riffe Lake by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 08:50:21 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by Ironhead
[Yesterday at 07:30:08 PM]


A question for any FFL holders on here by dreadi
[Yesterday at 07:28:54 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MuleyTracksWA
[Yesterday at 06:59:55 PM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 06:17:50 PM]


Montana Breaks Elk by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 05:45:34 PM]


MA-10 Coho by metlhead
[Yesterday at 03:32:38 PM]


Oregon special tag info by robescc
[Yesterday at 02:17:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal