collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Do you support NON magnifying scopes for muzzle loaders?

Yes
76 (38%)
No
124 (62%)

Total Members Voted: 199

Voting closed: June 20, 2017, 08:19:14 AM

Author Topic: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?  (Read 50906 times)

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9026
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #195 on: March 26, 2017, 06:10:33 PM »
I do think hunters should be more united on such topics

The problem a scope makes it a 200 yrd rifle, so then what we add there season to modern season and have one long season.

After a lot arguments I have made about lots of changes,I'm not for a lot of changes these days.I think we're good the way it is.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3074
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #196 on: March 26, 2017, 06:14:46 PM »
I told you exactly what was traditional about a muzzleloader.  I'll say it again. 

Open sights
Ignition exposed to the elements
Single shot
Loaded from the muzzle

Just like great grand pappy
Not just like great grand pappy but ok.People in WA. fought for you to use that inline.Just like they are right now for the use of scopes on muzzy,hounds for cougar,baiting for bear,the ability to still have limited baiting for elk and deer,leg hold traps, etc etc etc.You don't want so everyone can't is not how we should fight these fights
Who is fighting for scopes?  Is there organized lobbying?  OhMah are you on the GMAC?

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #197 on: March 26, 2017, 06:23:02 PM »
Yes there are people lobbying for this along with lots of other things.No i'm not in whatever GMAC is.It actually comes up here on this forum often as well.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline lazydrifter

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 764
  • Location: Port Angeles
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #198 on: March 26, 2017, 06:32:03 PM »
No different than archery.   1st we had the long bow.  Then the recurve.  Then the compound.  Went from 50% let off to 80% let off.  Mechanical releases.   sights.  lighted nocks.  carbon arrows.  Went from 30 yard shooting to 80 yard shooting.   Game cameras, thermal imaging.  Certainly not like grand dad did.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #199 on: March 26, 2017, 06:35:35 PM »
Not a 200 yard weapon.  A 400+ yard weapon.  I was shooting my hawkens to 200 before an inline ever made it into my hands. 
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #200 on: March 26, 2017, 06:55:55 PM »
Not a 200 yard weapon.  A 400+ yard weapon.  I was shooting my hawkens to 200 before an inline ever made it into my hands.
You were?At deer?
What energy and fps at 200 yards were you getting with the 1 in 48 twist Hawkens anyway?
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #201 on: March 26, 2017, 06:59:08 PM »
Not a 200 yard weapon.  A 400+ yard weapon.  I was shooting my hawkens to 200 before an inline ever made it into my hands.
You were?At deer?
What energy and fps at 200 yards were you getting with the 1 in 48 twist Hawkens anyway?
plenty enough to plow through the side of a deer.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #202 on: March 26, 2017, 07:05:08 PM »
Sure it does over 1000 energy i,m sure but you don't know?Its easy lets do it together 1, 2, 3, I DON'T KNOW
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #203 on: March 26, 2017, 07:05:56 PM »
Not a 200 yard weapon.  A 400+ yard weapon.  I was shooting my hawkens to 200 before an inline ever made it into my hands.
You were?At deer?
What energy and fps at 200 yards were you getting with the 1 in 48 twist Hawkens anyway?
plenty enough to plow through the side of a deer.
what kind of shot group did you usually have?
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #204 on: March 26, 2017, 07:10:14 PM »
Why do I need to know a number?  Numbers don't kill animals, bullets do. 
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #205 on: March 26, 2017, 07:11:07 PM »
Not a 200 yard weapon.  A 400+ yard weapon.  I was shooting my hawkens to 200 before an inline ever made it into my hands.
You were?At deer?
What energy and fps at 200 yards were you getting with the 1 in 48 twist Hawkens anyway?
plenty enough to plow through the side of a deer.
what kind of shot group did you usually have?
  with good wind I'll explode milk jugs until I get tired of doing it at 200.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #206 on: March 26, 2017, 07:13:22 PM »
I've hunted with a front stuffer for over 2/3 of my life and killed dozens and dozens of animals with one.  I've shot thousands of rounds out of my muzzleloaders. Really not seeing how any of the above has to do with scopes.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #207 on: March 26, 2017, 07:14:31 PM »
Why do I need to know a number?  Numbers don't kill animals, bullets do.
Oh i thought you were a long range accuracy is everything shooter that's all.You did lead me to benchmark barrels so i just assumed,carry on nothing to see here.

But since you asked why do i need to know the numbers?well if you don't know the numbers ill ask how many shots before you found the target at 200 yards?
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #208 on: March 26, 2017, 07:19:56 PM »
Why do I need to know a number?  Numbers don't kill animals, bullets do.
Oh i thought you were a long range accuracy is everything shooter that's all.You did lead me to benchmark barrels so i just assumed,carry on nothing to see here.

But since you asked why do i need to know the numbers?well if you don't know the numbers ill ask how many shots before you found the target at 200 yards?
don't over think it.  Large target.  Dead hold on the top.  Shoot a group and measure the drop.

It's not a precision rifle that I'm gonna chronograph and then true my ballistics on.  Go to the range and shoot.  No different than sighting it in at 100 yards.  Did you honestly think I just shot at 100 and then went out and blasted at stuff? 

Hunting is what I do.  It's all I do.  All off season is range time, scouting, research, gear upgrades.  I hunt 4-6 states a year.  Killing animals is what I do.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6613
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Poll- non magnifying scopes on muzzle loaders?
« Reply #209 on: March 26, 2017, 07:20:40 PM »
More importantly you prove my point in a way.A few of the people on here were concerned that putting a scope on a muzzy would turn it into a longer range weapon.well 200 yards is quite far with or without a scope.At 300 yards a 50. cal muzzy with 48 twist can't shoot more than around 800 fp energy at 300 yards.so how does a scope change it into a long range again?
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal