Free: Contests & Raffles.
Here are a few examples of what I've done in the last few months. Holding temp while making cheese is a pain so using the sous vide to hold the temp makes life a lot easier. So I made some cheddar cheese curds and then poutine. The other is a pork tenderloin over some butternut squash and ricotta chive gnocchi and sage brown butter.
There are sous vide instructions not only at the website for the product you buy, but all over the web. Cooking time has a minimum and a maximum (ex. 1.5 to 4 hours). The lower end of the scale is the minimum to achieve the desired doneness. The upper end of the scale is to ensure that you don't create a bacteria problem with extended time below 135 degrees. Anything over that mark can cook for a very long time, up to 24 hours or more. Longer cooking times mean more of an opportunity for meat broths, seasonings, herbs, oil and butter (always use some extra, flavorful oil or butter), to infuse flavors into the meat. It also changes the texture of meats like pork. One of the other benefits of the flexible time thing is that you can plan your plating perfectly - everything done at the same time. It also gives you time to relax before dinner with a cigar and copious quantities of your favorite beverage.
Chicken's a tough one. Most of the instructions I read have you cook chicken at 145 or 146 degrees. The breasts come out nice and juicy; no problem. Legs are another story. The meat is unattractive and it feels like you're eating raw chicken. It's tender and everything, but the appearance and texture say raw. I cooked some Buffalo wings two nights ago - same result. So next time I cook legs or thighs, I think I'm going hotter, like at least 155-160. Anyone else have feedback on this?
Quote from: pianoman9701 on July 12, 2017, 04:33:28 PMChicken's a tough one. Most of the instructions I read have you cook chicken at 145 or 146 degrees. The breasts come out nice and juicy; no problem. Legs are another story. The meat is unattractive and it feels like you're eating raw chicken. It's tender and everything, but the appearance and texture say raw. I cooked some Buffalo wings two nights ago - same result. So next time I cook legs or thighs, I think I'm going hotter, like at least 155-160. Anyone else have feedback on this?I haven't done chicken, but that's the age old problem with them damn birds. Cook white meat correctly, and dark meat is rare, and vice versa. Someone needs to engineer an all dark meat chicken (and turkey) and put a stop to this nonsense!
Messing around the other day and tried something that was pretty good. May play around with it a bit.Buttermilk fried chickenSous Vide chicken thighs and legs in buttermilk at 145 for 2 hrs. drain and dredge in seasoned flour, pan fried in oil until brown and crispy, just a few minutes per side. Could be deep fried and would be even easier i'd imagine.I thought it turned out pretty danged good. PS. Chicken looks terrible after the sous vide cooking but once fried you would not know the difference. Meat is cooked through even with short frying time.