collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: ffg vs fffg for shorter barrels  (Read 1890 times)

Offline mitch184

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 14
  • Location: Lake Stevens
ffg vs fffg for shorter barrels
« on: September 29, 2017, 09:51:22 AM »
Knight ultralight... 24" barrel, 1:28 twist, 300 grain bullet.

Knight does a blanket recommendation of ffg powder for there guns.  I've run 110gr. of this and it shoots good.  Given fffg is slightly faster burning and generally you need less to be equivalent,  is there any advantage to going with fffg for shorter, 24", barrels?

2 things I see...

1st....shorter barrel means less time to completely burn.  At some point, it would seem that too much ffg wouldn't burn completely before the bullet leaves the barrel.  Not sure if this is above or below 120 gr.  If above, guess it's a moot point.

2nd... if you can get the same velocity out of 110gr. of fffg or 120 gr. of ffg.... the smaller and shorter load of the fffg leaves more usable barrel length.

In reality I need to just shoot both, but food for thought and figured I'd ask.


Offline reelamin

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2017
  • Posts: 120
Re: ffg vs fffg for shorter barrels
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2017, 01:35:58 PM »
As you said you just need to shoot them both over a chronograph.  The results in your rifle might be 180 degrees from what "it should be".  In mine T7 3F almost equaled the velocity I was getting from BH209 with a lot less blow back through the nipple.

Offline Sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 2309
  • Location: Idaho, Northern
Re: ffg vs fffg for shorter barrels
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2017, 07:45:17 PM »
Knight ultralight... 24" barrel, 1:28 twist, 300 grain bullet.

Knight does a blanket recommendation of ffg powder for there guns.  I've run 110gr. of this and it shoots good.  Given fffg is slightly faster burning and generally you need less to be equivalent,  is there any advantage to going with fffg for shorter, 24", barrels?

2 things I see...

1st....shorter barrel means less time to completely burn.  At some point, it would seem that too much ffg wouldn't burn completely before the bullet leaves the barrel.  Not sure if this is above or below 120 gr.  If above, guess it's a moot point.

2nd... if you can get the same velocity out of 110gr. of fffg or 120 gr. of ffg.... the smaller and shorter load of the fffg leaves more usable barrel length.

In reality I need to just shoot both, but food for thought and figured I'd ask.

In the weather you hunt in - I would stay with 2f.  Over here when we are late season hunting the temps are often sub zero or in that area - those kind of temps I switch to 3f as it is easier to ignite.

Hornady says about a 5% uptake in velocity with same grains of 2f to 3f.. through the chrono - I do not always see it.

Keep shooting muzzleloaders - They are a blast!!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Delay of commission investigation+Lorna Smith finally defending hunting??? by ghosthunter
[Today at 04:10:09 PM]


Now we wait(Montana) by huntandjeep
[Today at 03:57:46 PM]


Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by HikerHunter
[Today at 03:44:59 PM]


Small plastic boats? by Born2late
[Today at 03:15:29 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by throttlejocky20
[Today at 02:35:47 PM]


suppressor for a 7mm-08 by JohnVH
[Today at 10:16:47 AM]


25-06 factory loads by lhrbull
[Today at 09:46:55 AM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by Rigby416
[Today at 09:35:11 AM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by buglebuster
[Today at 09:25:59 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Machias
[Today at 09:25:40 AM]


That first elk encounter… by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 08:32:47 AM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by Liroy
[Today at 03:58:58 AM]


September Mule Deer in the High Country by basedacid
[Yesterday at 09:35:22 PM]


Hoof rot by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 06:23:05 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal