Accurate Yakima reservation border

[optic2]

I was looking at Onx maps and then at Google maps and they show differing borders of the Yakima reservation. According to Google maps the town of Glenwood is in the reservation(https://www.google.com/maps/place/Yakama+Indian+Reservation,+South+Yakima,+WA/@46.094411,-121.2746467,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x5497a33a3be558b7:0x904bd0a6e902eb4d!8m2!3d46.2619033!4d-120.8489815), yet if you look at Onx maps it is not on the reservation (although a portion of the town is reservation land). And then I found this (http://www.hoodrivernews.com/news/2016/apr/20/klickitat-co-says-glenwood-not-part-yakama-reserva/) article from last year. So if I hunt the state land that Onx says is state land am I going to get arrested by the tribal cops?

[Bob33]

It appears to be in dispute.

"The community is on land whose jurisdiction is disputed between the Yakama Nation and Klickitat County."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenwood,_Klickitat_County,_Washington

[trophyhunt]

Feel free to hunt anywhere up there, I do.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

[logger]

there is intermixing of parcels up there in places, in some spots you will see flourescent paint on tree's painted YIN.  thats tribal as far as they are concerned

[optic2]

there is intermixing of parcels up there in places, in some spots you will see flourescent paint on tree's painted YIN.  thats tribal as far as they are concerned

I just looked at the GMU map (http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/gmu/2017-2018_gmus.pdf) from WDFW and it agrees with what Onx says.

[jnordwell]

Good old Track D... depending on the map, your either good or not.. never have heard anyone getting in trouble for hunting it..

[Whitefoot]

It clearly states Yakama Indian Reservation no Trespassing if people would leave the signs alone and not vandalize them.

[pianoman9701]

It clearly states Yakama Indian Reservation no Trespassing if people would leave the signs alone and not vandalize them.

Well, it's disputed, so...

[eastsidemallard74]

I was once told in court, the border was the different color grass/hay field I walked in, and got a trespass ticket for it...

[pianoman9701]

I was once told in court, the border was the different color grass/hay field I walked in, and got a trespass ticket for it...

If the WDFW and OnX agree and say the land's open, it's open. You can put up no trespassing signs on public land all day long. That doesn't make them private. Tribal lands are determined by treaties. If the treaty says it's tribal, the state would, too.

[PlateauNDN]

This is the million dollar question that has so many different answers.

[Back Country]

The town of Glenwood is not reservation, there are Parcels in the valley that are owned by the tribe but the valley itself is all owned by private landowners or private Timber companies.

[Rob Allen]

There are no elk there anyway..

[Wazukie]

Onx maps is correct in its boundaries.