collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?  (Read 6683 times)

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« on: March 04, 2009, 04:30:27 PM »
Dear Wildlife Enthusiast:

Thank you for your comment on Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife’s fall bear hunting season recommendation.  The Department has received numerous comments on this recommendation and all of the comments do not support the change to the August portion of bear season.  Because we’re “on the bubble” in terms of the biological justification for reducing bear harvest, the Department has altered our recommendation to open the 2009 fall bear season August 1 rather than September 1 (for the subset of Bear Management Units) with no private land designation.  The revised recommendation tries to balance the emerging biological concern, provide early fall hunting opportunity, and address public input.  After a thorough review of bear harvest trends and biological information, the Department will provide the Fish and Wildlife Commission with a recommendation for the 2010-2011 fall bear hunting season in March 2010. 

While reviewing the public input I also noticed several folks indicated they planned on attending the March 6-7 Commission meeting in Ellensburg to testify on this agenda item.  I want to inform you of this change in case your trip to Ellensburg hinged on the Departments bear hunting season recommendation.   I’ve attached the revised fall bear season recommendation for your convenience. 

Thank you again for provide feedback on our 3-year hunting season recommendations.

Sincerely,

Donny Martorello

Carnivore, Furbearer & Special Species Section Manager




Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2009, 04:32:45 PM »
The cynic in me wonders why they would send this message. I am also wondering why I didn't get a "personalized" response to my other email?




Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50709
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2009, 04:33:03 PM »
Quote
While reviewing the public input I also noticed several folks indicated they planned on attending the March 6-7 Commission meeting in Ellensburg to testify on this agenda item.  I want to inform you of this change in case your trip to Ellensburg hinged on the Departments bear hunting season recommendation.

call me simple, but it sounds like they are trying to save you a trip to ellensburg if that was the only reason you were going.
 :dunno:

i'm sure some folks think there is a deep dark hidden meaning behind that statement, but thats what it looks like to me.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2009, 04:34:23 PM »
 :chuckle:


The clown show continues......
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline yelp

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 3253
  • Location: Wild Turkey Country
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2009, 04:41:20 PM »
I got the same reply today...they don't want us taking up the commissions precious time..There is the fight for next years seasons too.  We'll see.  :rolleyes:
Wild Turkey, Walleyes, Whitetails and Wapiti..These are a few of my favorite things!!


Born to Yelp!
Short Hike Guide Service - Owner

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2009, 04:47:26 PM »
Quote
Because we’re “on the bubble” in terms of the biological justification for reducing bear harvest,

If that is not the most politically based statement I have ever heard :bs: We all know it was a knee jerk reaction meant to ease the pressure put on them by the hikers, anti's and politicians for the shooting last year, do they honestly believe we are that naive. :mor:

"Biological Justification" MY ASS!!!!
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline luvtohnt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 1438
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2009, 05:03:23 PM »
Quote
Because we’re “on the bubble” in terms of the biological justification for reducing bear harvest,

If that is really the case why not cut back the spring bear tags? That would make more sense in my opinion.

BTKR and Yelp are you guys going to come to the meeting.

Brandon

Offline Diehard0123

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1069
  • Location: Sultan, Wa
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2009, 05:03:40 PM »
I almost didn't open my email, it was from someone called "wildthing (DFW)" with the subject heading [No Subject]  I screen all my emails and ususally do not open them if they are not from someone I know.  You would think that the WDFW would have used a more formal email account to send us information, with a subject title.   :dunno:  

Savage 110 7mm Rem Mag

Offline yelp

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 3253
  • Location: Wild Turkey Country
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2009, 06:08:06 PM »
Oh Diehard..Wildthing you make my heart sing...I always get excited if there is an email in my inbox from a "wildthing" LOL...But seriously...I think headsupourass@DFW was taken... :chuckle:  Oh and try to email that address you may get a response LOL.   :o...
« Last Edit: March 04, 2009, 06:45:36 PM by yelp »
Wild Turkey, Walleyes, Whitetails and Wapiti..These are a few of my favorite things!!


Born to Yelp!
Short Hike Guide Service - Owner

Offline Michelle_Nelson

  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 7974
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Bring on the Bears!
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2009, 07:02:27 PM »
Even if you were planning on going if just to inquire about the Bear Season startring in September I would still make the trip.  If anything to see what else the Game department is planning and to see what else they are working on for next years Bear Season in reguards to Opening/Closing dates.  Among other things.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2009, 07:12:55 PM »
I got that email also. I have to give them credit in this case for doing the right thing and letting people know that a trip to Ellensburg may be a waste of their time, if in fact the trip over was only due to the bear hunting issue. I'm sure they also would rather not have the meeting room quite as overflowing as it might have been. Although they are still going to have plenty of company with all the archery hunters that are going.

Offline Gutpile

  • Gaseous horribulous stinkusis
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 4478
  • Location: Spokane Valley
    • https://www.facebook.com/mark.farrell.142?ref=tn_tnmn
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2009, 07:16:13 PM »
Quote
While reviewing the public input I also noticed several folks indicated they planned on attending the March 6-7 Commission meeting in Ellensburg to testify on this agenda item.  I want to inform you of this change in case your trip to Ellensburg hinged on the Departments bear hunting season recommendation.

call me simple, but it sounds like they are trying to save you a trip to ellensburg if that was the only reason you were going.
 :dunno:

i'm sure some folks think there is a deep dark hidden meaning behind that statement, but thats what it looks like to me.


I agree. Pretty decent of them if this is indeed the case.

Y.A.R. Gold Member

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50709
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2009, 07:24:08 PM »
thank god someone agreed with me...i was beginning to feel like a *censored* there for a bit.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline yelp

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 3253
  • Location: Wild Turkey Country
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #13 on: March 04, 2009, 07:54:37 PM »
I agree...I also think  that if every person got to talk they may be there for awhile.. For those going here are the procedures for comments...

Providing Public Input at Fish and Wildlife Commission Meetings

SIGN-UP SHEET
Please complete a "Public Testimony" form if you want to provide testimony (available at the meeting registration table). Submit your completed form to the Commission representative at the registration table PRIOR to the start of discussion of that agenda item.

AGENDA
Public testimony is accepted only during those agenda items designated for "Public Input," and during "Open Public Input" portions of the agenda (Open Public Input is usually scheduled twice per meeting day; once in the morning and once in the afternoon, for items not on the agenda). Be aware that items may be taken out of order, and that the times listed are estimates only.

TESTIMONY
Due to extensive participation at Commission meetings, your opportunity to give testimony to the full Commission may be limited. To provide a fair opportunity for everyone to be heard, please abide by the following ground rules:

Review pertinent information provided at the registration table.
Complete a "Public Testimony" form and submit at the registration table PRIOR to the start of discussion of that agenda item.
If you have written material you wish to provide to the Commissioners, please give 13 copies to the Commission representative when you sign up to speak.
Speakers will have 3 minutes to speak. (A timer will beep to indicate when your three minutes are up.)
Your testimony time cannot be given to another speaker.
Summarize rather than read written material.
Address the Commission and the issues, not the other speakers or staff.
Consider others' time by limiting your comments to new issues. If you agree with points made by previous speakers, simply acknowledge that and please move on to new information.
Don't repeat material you have previously submitted in writing; provide new material or verbally re-frame written material to promote a deeper understanding of your points.





Wild Turkey, Walleyes, Whitetails and Wapiti..These are a few of my favorite things!!


Born to Yelp!
Short Hike Guide Service - Owner

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 19002
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #14 on: March 04, 2009, 08:02:30 PM »
Well my friends I have heard this song before, this is the EXACT thing the told us at the meetings for the NE part of the state.  They said it was due to conflicts with other user groups, when the room got hostile they whipped out the oh too many sows are being harvested, the numbers are on decline.  So the room settled down.  Three years later I went back to the meeting and when I asked what the impact of the now after Labor Day opening had had on the sow harvest they looked at me like I had a third eye.  It's all total complete  :bs:
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2009, 06:09:53 AM »
Quote
Because we’re “on the bubble” in terms of the biological justification for reducing bear harvest,

If that is really the case why not cut back the spring bear tags? That would make more sense in my opinion.

BTKR and Yelp are you guys going to come to the meeting.

Brandon

I think spring is probably not the place to be cutting tags in most areas. IF this is a population issue I think the second tag should go first then cut the season back from elk and deer. Eliminate the incidental kills.


« Last Edit: March 05, 2009, 08:22:36 PM by billythekidrock »




Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2009, 06:23:28 AM »
Yes, maybe I am reading it wrong, but I am concerned that if we don't show how important public land is to us that we will be ran off of it next year. I am also concerned that these F&W bios don't want the Commission to see how passionate we are and how wrong they are.

In the original Proposal F&W stated that “Those data suggest bear populations are
stable to slightly declining (in a few BBMUs).”
BUT  “The justification for this change is to reduce conflict with other recreational users on public lands during the summer while still allowing bears to be harvested for damage reasons”

Weeks ago Machias made a post about how they did this verything in the past and reverted to the population issue. That post made me pay attention and I have to say that I believe F&W is going to switch gears and not mention "recreational users" and go full bore with the "biological" angle next year. To add weight to this statement, take a look at the revised proposals.

I tried to copy from the revised proposal but it wouldn't let me.

Now, if you look at the revised proposal there is no mention of "recreational users" in the bear cougar section like before. Why did they take out their "justification" and change it?

Again, if the population is in jeapordy then we can handle a shorter season, but don't take August or public lands away from us. There are better ways to handle a bear population issue.




Offline saylean

  • Team Slayer Packmule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 8380
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2009, 09:44:13 AM »
I completly agree with ya Billy. Take away the "recreaton" part, give it a year and say "this cant be a knee jerk decision, that was 2 years ago, its biological."

To me, the simplest way to do it is just eliminate the 2nd tag....of course, then they would be loosing some moola...


Offline Snapshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 721
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2009, 05:26:31 PM »
I hope no one decides to stay home. A few bunny huggers in Spandex clutching a copy of 101 Hikes in the Central Cascades could sway the Commission on this topic. If you care, you'd better go there and show it.
DS
I'd just like to remind everybody that it's about the hunting, not just the killing. In other words, it's about the total experience, the sport itself and the challenge involved. Bowhunting, done right, is a justifiable and honorable pursuit. Done for the wrong reasons, simply chalking up kills and seeking personal glory, it's taking away rather than giving back to a principled way of life that has to be experienced to be understood. G.StCharles

Offline woodswalker

  • Curmudgeon in training
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1764
  • Location: on the way to Stevens Pass
    • https://www.facebook.com/Grumpys-Gun-Repair-153675238330367/?ref=br_rs&pnref=lhc
    • Grumpys Gun Repair
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, Ducks Unlimited, RMEF, SRPA WHEIA
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2009, 05:47:43 PM »
I'll be there in the afternoon and then Saturday....have to work Friday AM til Noon
A Smith & Wesson Beats Four Aces.

Whatta ya mean I can't have one of each?

What we have here is...Washington Department of NO Fish and WATCHABLE Wildlife.
 
WDFW is going farther and farther backwards....we need FISH AND GAME back!

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #20 on: March 05, 2009, 08:25:05 PM »
Unfortunately due to weather 3 of us will not make it.  :bash:




Offline Snapshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 721
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2009, 11:34:44 AM »
Conditions & weather (from DOT): Bare & dry, wet in places & ice in places. :yike:
What's the problem? Are you early-season-only hunters?  ;)
I'd just like to remind everybody that it's about the hunting, not just the killing. In other words, it's about the total experience, the sport itself and the challenge involved. Bowhunting, done right, is a justifiable and honorable pursuit. Done for the wrong reasons, simply chalking up kills and seeking personal glory, it's taking away rather than giving back to a principled way of life that has to be experienced to be understood. G.StCharles

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

re-barreling a gun by Wingin it
[Today at 06:52:34 AM]


Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by Wingin it
[Today at 06:45:11 AM]


Possible record bull? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:44:10 AM]


Entiat Modern hunting by vandeman17
[Today at 06:42:15 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:21:38 AM]


My new BB Gun by FlyFish360
[Today at 03:09:02 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by RoostrCogburn
[Today at 12:54:56 AM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by PsoasHunter
[Yesterday at 10:35:26 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Pudelguy
[Yesterday at 09:29:59 PM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by Berner5
[Yesterday at 09:18:43 PM]


Research Request - Deer, Moose & Elk Samples by cjc23
[Yesterday at 09:09:08 PM]


CITES hide sealer and Fur Harvesters Receiving Agent info Pt 1 by Frank The Tank
[Yesterday at 08:53:02 PM]


We lost one of our own (Colockumelk) by cem3434
[Yesterday at 08:46:12 PM]


Color phase fox by Frank The Tank
[Yesterday at 08:30:28 PM]


Found tripod by royalbull
[Yesterday at 06:49:42 PM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by bb76
[Yesterday at 06:10:17 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Houmike
[Yesterday at 03:16:47 PM]


Moose Hunt - Mt. Spokane North - Late Season Advice by shafump86
[Yesterday at 12:39:58 PM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by logola512c
[Yesterday at 12:30:45 PM]


Selling Pistols and rifles by Rat44
[Yesterday at 10:58:30 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal