collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?  (Read 6692 times)

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2009, 06:09:53 AM »
Quote
Because we’re “on the bubble” in terms of the biological justification for reducing bear harvest,

If that is really the case why not cut back the spring bear tags? That would make more sense in my opinion.

BTKR and Yelp are you guys going to come to the meeting.

Brandon

I think spring is probably not the place to be cutting tags in most areas. IF this is a population issue I think the second tag should go first then cut the season back from elk and deer. Eliminate the incidental kills.


« Last Edit: March 05, 2009, 08:22:36 PM by billythekidrock »




Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2009, 06:23:28 AM »
Yes, maybe I am reading it wrong, but I am concerned that if we don't show how important public land is to us that we will be ran off of it next year. I am also concerned that these F&W bios don't want the Commission to see how passionate we are and how wrong they are.

In the original Proposal F&W stated that “Those data suggest bear populations are
stable to slightly declining (in a few BBMUs).”
BUT  “The justification for this change is to reduce conflict with other recreational users on public lands during the summer while still allowing bears to be harvested for damage reasons”

Weeks ago Machias made a post about how they did this verything in the past and reverted to the population issue. That post made me pay attention and I have to say that I believe F&W is going to switch gears and not mention "recreational users" and go full bore with the "biological" angle next year. To add weight to this statement, take a look at the revised proposals.

I tried to copy from the revised proposal but it wouldn't let me.

Now, if you look at the revised proposal there is no mention of "recreational users" in the bear cougar section like before. Why did they take out their "justification" and change it?

Again, if the population is in jeapordy then we can handle a shorter season, but don't take August or public lands away from us. There are better ways to handle a bear population issue.




Offline saylean

  • Team Slayer Packmule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 8380
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2009, 09:44:13 AM »
I completly agree with ya Billy. Take away the "recreaton" part, give it a year and say "this cant be a knee jerk decision, that was 2 years ago, its biological."

To me, the simplest way to do it is just eliminate the 2nd tag....of course, then they would be loosing some moola...


Offline Snapshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 721
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2009, 05:26:31 PM »
I hope no one decides to stay home. A few bunny huggers in Spandex clutching a copy of 101 Hikes in the Central Cascades could sway the Commission on this topic. If you care, you'd better go there and show it.
DS
I'd just like to remind everybody that it's about the hunting, not just the killing. In other words, it's about the total experience, the sport itself and the challenge involved. Bowhunting, done right, is a justifiable and honorable pursuit. Done for the wrong reasons, simply chalking up kills and seeking personal glory, it's taking away rather than giving back to a principled way of life that has to be experienced to be understood. G.StCharles

Offline woodswalker

  • Curmudgeon in training
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1764
  • Location: on the way to Stevens Pass
    • https://www.facebook.com/Grumpys-Gun-Repair-153675238330367/?ref=br_rs&pnref=lhc
    • Grumpys Gun Repair
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, Ducks Unlimited, RMEF, SRPA WHEIA
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2009, 05:47:43 PM »
I'll be there in the afternoon and then Saturday....have to work Friday AM til Noon
A Smith & Wesson Beats Four Aces.

Whatta ya mean I can't have one of each?

What we have here is...Washington Department of NO Fish and WATCHABLE Wildlife.
 
WDFW is going farther and farther backwards....we need FISH AND GAME back!

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #20 on: March 05, 2009, 08:25:05 PM »
Unfortunately due to weather 3 of us will not make it.  :bash:




Offline Snapshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 721
Re: WDFW - Trying to discourage attendance?
« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2009, 11:34:44 AM »
Conditions & weather (from DOT): Bare & dry, wet in places & ice in places. :yike:
What's the problem? Are you early-season-only hunters?  ;)
I'd just like to remind everybody that it's about the hunting, not just the killing. In other words, it's about the total experience, the sport itself and the challenge involved. Bowhunting, done right, is a justifiable and honorable pursuit. Done for the wrong reasons, simply chalking up kills and seeking personal glory, it's taking away rather than giving back to a principled way of life that has to be experienced to be understood. G.StCharles

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Mushroom ID Thread by Platensek-po
[Today at 09:21:16 AM]


Anyone use game carts? by dilleytech
[Today at 09:13:51 AM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Booner
[Today at 09:13:23 AM]


New property cams checked by finnman
[Today at 09:02:38 AM]


East Side by BUCKHUNT
[Today at 09:00:34 AM]


Where do the bulls go? by Mtnwalker
[Today at 08:58:55 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by TeacherMan
[Today at 08:44:21 AM]


49 DN Moose Success by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 08:35:00 AM]


Desert unit 290 October buck hunt by JakeLand
[Today at 08:29:34 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by JakeLand
[Today at 08:22:01 AM]


Harlequin in weird places? by Salmonmoocher12
[Today at 08:02:10 AM]


Duck Boat Blind by callturner
[Today at 07:25:58 AM]


Not quite by nwwanderer
[Today at 07:24:14 AM]


Weyerhauser: St Helens - inscrutable? by craigapphunt
[Today at 07:21:24 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Seabass
[Yesterday at 09:46:33 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:14:18 PM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:02:11 PM]


Share your out of state experience by Alan K
[Yesterday at 08:58:56 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Big6bull
[Yesterday at 08:50:37 PM]


Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 07:32:22 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal