collapse

Author Topic: Cities sue Defense Dept.  (Read 326 times)

Online Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4915
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
Cities sue Defense Dept.
« on: December 27, 2017, 05:58:45 PM »
Don't believe this has been posted already, I think I got the entire article copied incase some can't see the link:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/26/us/gun-background-checks-military.html


Three major cities have filed a lawsuit against the Defense Department for its failure to report many criminal convictions in the military justice system to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and its national gun background-check database.

The Pentagon has for years run afoul of federal laws intended to keep guns out of the hands of felons and domestic abusers by not transmitting to the F.B.I. the names of service members convicted of crimes that disqualify gun ownership.

This is what allowed Devin P. Kelley, who was convicted of domestic assault in the Air Force, to buy at a store the rifle he used to kill 25 people, including a pregnant woman whose fetus also died, at a Texas church in November.

Now, after two decades of serious lapses — and one of the worst mass shootings in American history — officials from New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco are trying to force a change. Their suit would require the Pentagon to submit to federal court monitoring of its compliance with the reporting laws it has broken time and again.

“This failure on behalf of the Department of Defense has led to the loss of innocent lives by putting guns in the hands of criminals and those who wish to cause immeasurable harm,” Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York said.

The cities say they are suing because their police departments regularly access the federal background-check database and rely on it to provide accurate information about who should be prevented from buying guns.

The Pentagon has repeatedly been chided since the 1990s by its own inspector general for woefully failing to comply with the law. In a 2015 report — and another one issued just a few weeks ago — investigators said that nearly one in three court-martial convictions that should have barred defendants from gun purchases had gone unreported by the military.

Having a federal court oversee compliance, the cities in the lawsuit say, would reduce the chance that a tragedy like the massacre in Sutherland Springs, Tex., happens again.

If the lawsuit is successful and the military fails to adhere to a court order to demonstrate compliance with the law, a federal judge could hold the defendants in contempt, lawyers for the plaintiffs say. The lawsuit names as defendants the Defense Department and its secretary, James N. Mattis; the Departments of the Air Force, Army and Navy and their respective secretaries; the directors of the military’s criminal investigative organizations; and the commander of the Navy’s personnel command.

Generally, the military is required to report felony-equivalent court-martial convictions for crimes that are punishable by more than one year in prison, and any convictions for domestic violence. As with those of similar convictions in civilian courts, the records are supposed to block defendants from buying guns.

The military must also report anyone who receives a dishonorable discharge, which precludes gun ownership. Federal law also bans ownership by drug abusers, people subject to certain restraining orders, and mentally ill people.

“I believe the active involvement of the court system will produce the desired results,” said Ken Taber, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs. “This will impose an outside monitor to make sure that what should have been done for two decades is finally done.”

Another lawyer for the plaintiffs, Adam Skaggs, added that the lawsuit was not seeking a new interpretation of law — merely that a judge be enlisted to help ensure the military’s adherence to existing rules.

“After 20 years of failure, outside monitoring by the courts is clearly necessary to guarantee that the reporting failures that led to the Texas church shooting never happen again,” said Mr. Skaggs, the chief counsel of the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

“The department continues to work with the services as they review and refine their policies and procedures to ensure qualifying criminal history information is submitted to the F.B.I.,” said Tom Crosson, a Pentagon spokesman. He declined to comment specifically on the lawsuits.

In the wake of the church massacre, military leaders have acknowledged the severity of their reporting lapses and vowed to improve.

“This is a problem across all the services where we have gaps in reporting criminal activity of people in service,” the Army chief of staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, said after it emerged that the Texas gunman’s Air Force conviction was never sent to the background-check database.

The Pentagon’s acting inspector general, Glenn A. Fine, told a Senate committee earlier this month that “there’s really no excuse” for the military’s repeated failure to comply with the reporting rules.

But even with bolstered compliance, major loopholes would still remain.

Had Mr. Kelley’s conviction been in the background-check database, for example, he still could have purchased a gun in person or online from private sellers, who are not required to run the background check — an exemption known as the “gun show loophole.”

And while federal law calls for domestic violence convictions to be reported, the rules generally exempt the reporting of misdemeanor convictions where the victim is only a dating partner, an exception known as the “boyfriend loophole.”

But the sort of federal monitoring that the lawsuit proposes has had successes, including efforts by the Justice Department to rein in police departments that use discriminatory tactics or excessive force.

Some agreements to revamp law enforcement practices — known as consent decrees — that have been overseen by federal courts have been credited with helping spur marked improvements in police forces in Los Angeles and other cities.


It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 10394
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Cities sue Defense Dept.
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2017, 06:32:33 PM »
Cities that need to be sued themselves for providing sanctuary to illegal aliens killing far more than DOD errors.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 27625
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • NRA Life, MH, WFW, CCRKBA, NAGR, RMEF, WSB
Re: Cities sue Defense Dept.
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2017, 06:50:47 AM »
Cities that need to be sued themselves for providing sanctuary to illegal aliens killing far more than DOD errors.

These two things aren't mutually exclusive. There should be a huge emphasis on correcting both.  :twocents:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

 

* Recent Topics

Alaknak tent 12x20 by Hankbest17
[Today at 08:57:30 PM]


KUIU SITKA CLOTHES by ThurstonCokid
[Today at 08:51:42 PM]


Browning xbolt pro long range ? by spoonman
[Today at 08:51:24 PM]


Sign up for Trapper Education class December 1st by mgraywolff
[Today at 08:49:42 PM]


New wolf update 9/18/18 by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 08:43:43 PM]


Blue Mountain Foothills West by 270Flat
[Today at 08:41:58 PM]


PROFANITY PACK MISSING ONE WOLF by HighlandLofts
[Today at 08:38:17 PM]


Chemical Spraying by Samloffler
[Today at 08:38:11 PM]


Eco-diesel Alert by Timberstalker
[Today at 08:37:07 PM]


More goats. by jackelope
[Today at 08:36:59 PM]


Conflict Goat Tag by jackelope
[Today at 08:35:57 PM]


Woodland Caribou of WA....and ID/BC by Hoythunter
[Today at 08:33:17 PM]


Taking a tag along by Oh Mah
[Today at 08:31:46 PM]


WTS LCRX 3 inch model $300 by Coldrice
[Today at 08:26:48 PM]


Hogue 700 long action stocks by Snakeriver
[Today at 08:26:48 PM]


2018, ELK, Post them here! by 180-GRAIN
[Today at 08:21:47 PM]


.270 win ammo -10 boxes of Sako 156gr hammerhead by nicz
[Today at 08:18:49 PM]


Does anyone where orange?? by wadu1
[Today at 08:15:30 PM]


1/2 life size black bear. (The Shed Taxidermy Studio) by n_mathews13
[Today at 08:10:23 PM]


Wanted: Firewood by westside103147
[Today at 08:06:21 PM]