Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Sitka_Blacktail on January 15, 2018, 06:10:51 PMQuote from: onmygame on January 15, 2018, 10:11:45 AMThe title of this thread states the mammals are now taking more salmon than fishermen. The text of the study states they MAY be taking more.The numbers are all over the place in this study - and it merely suggests the possibility.I'm guessing the article says "may" because it's an estimate based on computer models. Sea mammals obviously don't report their take like humans.But other than being an estimate, this sounds pretty definitive. I'm sure they will do more research and decide if their computer models are realistic."The researchers estimate that from 1975 to 2015, the yearly biomass of Chinook salmon consumed by sea lions, seals, and killer whales increased from 6,100 to 15,200 metric tons, and from five to 31.5 million individual salmon.""Over the same time span, they found that the annual Chinook harvest by fishermen decreased from 16,400 to 9,600 metric tons, and from 3.6 million to 2.1 million individual fish. "You do understand the difference between NOW doing something an MAY BE doing something.There is absolutely nothing definitive about that. Period.As I said earlier, the numbers are all over the place - and a range from between 5 million and 31.5 million fish makes the study look to be more speculation than scientific in nature.Don't get me wrong - I applaud your efforts to enlighten those here on any developments, new, old or otherwise, and suspect your efforts are pure of heart.What you might consider in the future though, is not editorializing these things - if your intention is to simply report them.Let the data speak for itself, and let everyone come to their own conclusion - which may differ by the way - from yours, or someone else'. Herd mentality is best served on four hooves.
Quote from: onmygame on January 15, 2018, 10:11:45 AMThe title of this thread states the mammals are now taking more salmon than fishermen. The text of the study states they MAY be taking more.The numbers are all over the place in this study - and it merely suggests the possibility.I'm guessing the article says "may" because it's an estimate based on computer models. Sea mammals obviously don't report their take like humans.But other than being an estimate, this sounds pretty definitive. I'm sure they will do more research and decide if their computer models are realistic."The researchers estimate that from 1975 to 2015, the yearly biomass of Chinook salmon consumed by sea lions, seals, and killer whales increased from 6,100 to 15,200 metric tons, and from five to 31.5 million individual salmon.""Over the same time span, they found that the annual Chinook harvest by fishermen decreased from 16,400 to 9,600 metric tons, and from 3.6 million to 2.1 million individual fish. "
The title of this thread states the mammals are now taking more salmon than fishermen. The text of the study states they MAY be taking more.The numbers are all over the place in this study - and it merely suggests the possibility.
Quote from: JimmyHoffa on January 16, 2018, 12:15:57 PMYou think the whales actively or instinctively know this? "Whale so and so ate a diet of seals all his life and died at 30, all the whales that eat salmon live to be 70. I'll eat salmon only!"I don't know. Good question. Maybe they feel sick after eating seals.
You think the whales actively or instinctively know this? "Whale so and so ate a diet of seals all his life and died at 30, all the whales that eat salmon live to be 70. I'll eat salmon only!"
Quote from: magnanimous_j on January 16, 2018, 12:33:00 PMQuote from: JimmyHoffa on January 16, 2018, 12:15:57 PMYou think the whales actively or instinctively know this? "Whale so and so ate a diet of seals all his life and died at 30, all the whales that eat salmon live to be 70. I'll eat salmon only!"I don't know. Good question. Maybe they feel sick after eating seals.That’s a very interesting theory guys. I had not thought of that.
Quote from: onmygame on January 15, 2018, 06:51:06 PMYou do understand the difference between NOW doing something an MAY BE doing something.There is absolutely nothing definitive about that. Period.As I said earlier, the numbers are all over the place - and a range from between 5 million and 31.5 million fish makes the study look to be more speculation than scientific in nature.Reading comprehension..... I thought they taught that in school.That is not a range, it is the estimated increase between 1975 and 2015, a period of 30 years.
You do understand the difference between NOW doing something an MAY BE doing something.There is absolutely nothing definitive about that. Period.As I said earlier, the numbers are all over the place - and a range from between 5 million and 31.5 million fish makes the study look to be more speculation than scientific in nature.
Quote from: Jake Dogfish on January 17, 2018, 10:33:25 PMQuote from: magnanimous_j on January 16, 2018, 12:33:00 PMQuote from: JimmyHoffa on January 16, 2018, 12:15:57 PMYou think the whales actively or instinctively know this? "Whale so and so ate a diet of seals all his life and died at 30, all the whales that eat salmon live to be 70. I'll eat salmon only!"I don't know. Good question. Maybe they feel sick after eating seals.That’s a very interesting theory guys. I had not thought of that.Could just be the way they were raised, their culture so to speak. Just like different human cultures eat different foods and get adapted to them. How many here would eat the bugs and worms eaten by some cultures? They might be good for you, but they'd be pretty hard to stomach. And some of the things we eat are gross to others. Not to mention the way they are prepared.
Quote from: Sitka_Blacktail on January 18, 2018, 05:33:03 PMQuote from: Jake Dogfish on January 17, 2018, 10:33:25 PMQuote from: magnanimous_j on January 16, 2018, 12:33:00 PMQuote from: JimmyHoffa on January 16, 2018, 12:15:57 PMYou think the whales actively or instinctively know this? "Whale so and so ate a diet of seals all his life and died at 30, all the whales that eat salmon live to be 70. I'll eat salmon only!"I don't know. Good question. Maybe they feel sick after eating seals.That’s a very interesting theory guys. I had not thought of that.Could just be the way they were raised, their culture so to speak. Just like different human cultures eat different foods and get adapted to them. How many here would eat the bugs and worms eaten by some cultures? They might be good for you, but they'd be pretty hard to stomach. And some of the things we eat are gross to others. Not to mention the way they are prepared.I've eaten locusts & scorpian. Monkey brains, cow brains, dog, seacucumber.... well mostly I could chew it up but it wouldn't make it past my Adams apple...Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Quote from: Sitka_Blacktail on January 16, 2018, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: onmygame on January 15, 2018, 06:51:06 PMYou do understand the difference between NOW doing something an MAY BE doing something.There is absolutely nothing definitive about that. Period.As I said earlier, the numbers are all over the place - and a range from between 5 million and 31.5 million fish makes the study look to be more speculation than scientific in nature.yup a typoReading comprehension..... I thought they taught that in school.That is not a range, it is the estimated increase between 1975 and 2015, a period of 30 years.Good thing you paid attention in English because your math is lacking. 1975 to 2015 would be 40 years.
Quote from: onmygame on January 15, 2018, 06:51:06 PMYou do understand the difference between NOW doing something an MAY BE doing something.There is absolutely nothing definitive about that. Period.As I said earlier, the numbers are all over the place - and a range from between 5 million and 31.5 million fish makes the study look to be more speculation than scientific in nature.yup a typoReading comprehension..... I thought they taught that in school.That is not a range, it is the estimated increase between 1975 and 2015, a period of 30 years.
"The study used models to estimate marine mammal consumption of Chinook salmon based on several assumptions about their diet and the size and weight of salmon. The researchers estimate that from 1975 to 2015, the yearly biomass of Chinook salmon consumed by sea lions, seals, and killer whales increased from 6,100 to 15,200 metric tons, and from five to 31.5 million individual salmon."NOW HOLD on just one minute, back in late 90's early 2000, the Salmon was put on the ESL because of the evil loggers and uncontrolled irrigate-rs stealing water from them and causing in-stream silting of spawning beds!!!
The way I had sea cucumber didn't taste bad. There was just a taste texture disconnect. Imagine a jellow shot that was leftnin the fridge forn a week or 2. Some where between yellow and a rubber band with bumps on it. It tasted something like a greasy piece of gristle. (One of my favorites). A good hard chew could not cut said sea cucumber into smaller pieces. This wasn't at some discount shack it was a high end restaurant in China.Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Quote from: JimmyHoffa on January 16, 2018, 12:15:57 PMYou think the whales actively or instinctively know this? "Whale so and so ate a diet of seals all his life and died at 30, all the whales that eat salmon live to be 70. I'll eat salmon only!"Funny you mention this. I saw a show on the animal planet a few nights ago. It was centered around a female orca killing a shark off some islands off the coast of San Francisco. The orca bio explained the different regional pods and what they eat. Canadian, Washington and I can't remember but I think Alaska pods (I could be wrong on that) eat salmon only and other pods around the globe will eat seals amongst other critters. Like Sitka said it's a cultural thing, they haven't seen their peers eating seals yet so they don't, yet...