collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States  (Read 9503 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10636
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #45 on: March 14, 2018, 07:45:14 AM »


Fire fighters aren't government employees? What agency stopped logging which resulted in over aged forests?

During the last decade many Americans have lost jobs, taken pay cuts, reduced their lifestyles, lost their business, lost their retirements, lost their homes, lost their health insurance, and have barely made ends meet. At the same time politicians and government workers have experienced pay increases and free healthcare. A little correction is not unreasonable. I doubt we'll see any full scale correction, but many people are going to be happy to see any correction that happens, even if it may not seem fair to some people. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger telling you the way it is!  :twocents:

Fed salaries have actually stayed stagnant over the past decade. There have been several years of no pay increases and when it does happen, it's a whopping 1%.

The number of federal firefighters are actually down. That's why the feds have to ask states for help more and more.

Free insurance? Well look for yourself on the OPM website.

I'm not "shooting the messenger" I'm saying what you're saying is completely false.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk


Offline olyguy79

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 321
  • Location: Thurston
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #46 on: March 14, 2018, 07:48:23 AM »


Fire fighters aren't government employees? What agency stopped logging which resulted in over aged forests?

During the last decade many Americans have lost jobs, taken pay cuts, reduced their lifestyles, lost their business, lost their retirements, lost their homes, lost their health insurance, and have barely made ends meet. At the same time politicians and government workers have experienced pay increases and free healthcare. A little correction is not unreasonable. I doubt we'll see any full scale correction, but many people are going to be happy to see any correction that happens, even if it may not seem fair to some people. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger telling you the way it is!  :twocents:

Fed salaries have actually stayed stagnant over the past decade. There have been several years of no pay increases and when it does happen, it's a whopping 1%.

The number of federal firefighters are actually down. That's why the feds have to ask states for help more and more.

Free insurance? Well look for yourself on the OPM website.

I'm not "shooting the messenger" I'm saying what you're saying is completely false.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
:yeah:

Want a good paying govt job? Work for the local govt. They typically pay better than the feds. Also easier to get hired with locals as the feds are constantly going thru hiring freezes, budget cuts, etc.

Some people need to actually do research and not believe everything heard thru their ears.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk


Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #47 on: March 14, 2018, 08:11:43 AM »
"In WA this comes to about a million dollars a year which fully funds three WDFW Officer positions and the vehicle/vessel maintenance, fuel, etc to deal with federal fisheries enforcement."

I don't think I am the only one surprised to learn here that for $1 million, the government only gets 3 guys and a boat for our money.

At that rate, I am inclined to say privatize it and incentivize citizen co-enforcement of it.
Where did I say A boat?

You apparently missed where I said it equated to 6 officers... but fully funded 3 positions

So three people and half the costs for a fleet of vehicles/vessels for a crew of six?

« Last Edit: March 14, 2018, 09:47:42 AM by Fl0und3rz »

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1615
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #48 on: March 14, 2018, 08:25:34 AM »
I could never summon any sympathy or support for wdfw until they start actually managing properly. 

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10636
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #49 on: March 14, 2018, 08:30:34 AM »
"In WA this comes to about a million dollars a year which fully funds three WDFW Officer positions and the vehicle/vessel maintenance, fuel, etc to deal with federal fisheries enforcement."

I don't think I am the only one surprised to learn here that for $1 million, the government only gets 3 guys and a boat for our money.

At that rate, I am inclined to say privatize it and incentivize citizen co-enforcement of it.
Where did I say A boat?
You apparently missed where I said it equated to 6 officers... but fully funded 3 positions
So three people and half the costs for a fleet of vehicles/vessels for a crew of six?

Don't hide the ball.
Funding Type                 Hours                     Cost ($)
Dockside Personnel        9,167                     475,455
At-sea Personnel           1,964                     104,687
Vessel                          982                        98,154
Outreach                     100                         5,100
Administrative              320                          10,880
Indirect/Overhead          N/A                        239,125
Equipment                    N/A                        156,895
Total:                         12,533                    $1,090,256

When you calculate the categories for which there are hours by the total costs for those categories you come out to about $55 an hour, which includes salary and benefits.

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #50 on: March 14, 2018, 09:54:02 AM »
Thank you for the informed response and my apologies for the short, terse response.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38583
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #51 on: March 15, 2018, 04:41:06 PM »


Fire fighters aren't government employees? What agency stopped logging which resulted in over aged forests?

During the last decade many Americans have lost jobs, taken pay cuts, reduced their lifestyles, lost their business, lost their retirements, lost their homes, lost their health insurance, and have barely made ends meet. At the same time politicians and government workers have experienced pay increases and free healthcare. A little correction is not unreasonable. I doubt we'll see any full scale correction, but many people are going to be happy to see any correction that happens, even if it may not seem fair to some people. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger telling you the way it is!  :twocents:

Fed salaries have actually stayed stagnant over the past decade. There have been several years of no pay increases and when it does happen, it's a whopping 1%.

The number of federal firefighters are actually down. That's why the feds have to ask states for help more and more.

Free insurance? Well look for yourself on the OPM website.

I'm not "shooting the messenger" I'm saying what you're saying is completely false.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

1% gain a few years is better than the 70% loss I took in one year. I know others who lost their businesses or jobs entirely and lots of jobs pay less or more often certain positions were eliminated to create lower paying positions. While you may feel slighted, you should feel blessed, government workers have fared pretty well! I always tell people if you can get on a full time job with the "G" do it.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10636
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #52 on: March 15, 2018, 05:55:53 PM »
Fire fighters aren't government employees? What agency stopped logging which resulted in over aged forests?

During the last decade many Americans have lost jobs, taken pay cuts, reduced their lifestyles, lost their business, lost their retirements, lost their homes, lost their health insurance, and have barely made ends meet. At the same time politicians and government workers have experienced pay increases and free healthcare. A little correction is not unreasonable. I doubt we'll see any full scale correction, but many people are going to be happy to see any correction that happens, even if it may not seem fair to some people. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger telling you the way it is!  :twocents:

Fed salaries have actually stayed stagnant over the past decade. There have been several years of no pay increases and when it does happen, it's a whopping 1%.

The number of federal firefighters are actually down. That's why the feds have to ask states for help more and more.

Free insurance? Well look for yourself on the OPM website.

I'm not "shooting the messenger" I'm saying what you're saying is completely false.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
1% gain a few years is better than the 70% loss I took in one year. I know others who lost their businesses or jobs entirely and lots of jobs pay less or more often certain positions were eliminated to create lower paying positions. While you may feel slighted, you should feel blessed, government workers have fared pretty well! I always tell people if you can get on a full time job with the "G" do it.
You can always find people who do better or who do worse than others.

Want to make a ton of money? Don't work for the feds quite simply. Because unless you get high up, you'll be sitting at about the average US income. If someone wanted to pursue a biology career asked my advice I'd tell them if they wanted to make a lot of money go into the private sector, if you can't get on there then go state, and if not there go federal, especially if they live in the western US. Unfortunately there are some professions where there isn't a private sector option, such as law enforcement. My family is full of state, federal, local and private employees, the highest earners are the private employees.

We all make a choices in life in our career aspirations. You can't fault a guy for going into the private sector or the public sector. Yet for some reason govt employees seem to always be the target. Where's all the people saying Boeing engineers make too much $?

Offline olyguy79

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 321
  • Location: Thurston
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #53 on: March 15, 2018, 05:57:11 PM »
Fire fighters aren't government employees? What agency stopped logging which resulted in over aged forests?

During the last decade many Americans have lost jobs, taken pay cuts, reduced their lifestyles, lost their business, lost their retirements, lost their homes, lost their health insurance, and have barely made ends meet. At the same time politicians and government workers have experienced pay increases and free healthcare. A little correction is not unreasonable. I doubt we'll see any full scale correction, but many people are going to be happy to see any correction that happens, even if it may not seem fair to some people. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger telling you the way it is!  :twocents:

Fed salaries have actually stayed stagnant over the past decade. There have been several years of no pay increases and when it does happen, it's a whopping 1%.

The number of federal firefighters are actually down. That's why the feds have to ask states for help more and more.

Free insurance? Well look for yourself on the OPM website.

I'm not "shooting the messenger" I'm saying what you're saying is completely false.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
1% gain a few years is better than the 70% loss I took in one year. I know others who lost their businesses or jobs entirely and lots of jobs pay less or more often certain positions were eliminated to create lower paying positions. While you may feel slighted, you should feel blessed, government workers have fared pretty well! I always tell people if you can get on a full time job with the "G" do it.
You can always find people who do better or who do worse than others.

Want to make a ton of money? Don't work for the feds quite simply. Because unless you get high up, you'll be sitting at about the average US income. If someone wanted to pursue a biology career asked my advice I'd tell them if they wanted to make a lot of money go into the private sector, if you can't get on there then go state, and if not there go federal, especially if they live in the western US. Unfortunately there are some professions where there isn't a private sector option, such as law enforcement. My family is full of state, federal, local and private employees, the highest earners are the private employees.

We all make a choices in life in our career aspirations. You can't fault a guy for going into the private sector or the public sector. Yet for some reason govt employees seem to always be the target. Where's all the people saying Boeing engineers make too much $?
My daughter-in-law doubled her pay when she went from a full-time bio with Washington DNR to a private entity, with half the responsibilities. The local fed bio made less then her at DNR.  :twocents:

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #54 on: March 15, 2018, 05:57:38 PM »
Thanks for putting up with us BT


I think if NOAA is cleaned up, and other federal money is going to enforcement and not being wasted then I'm for it.  I think all of us at HW want to see better, more efficient enforcement, and if these dollars are withheld they'll scavenge money from east side big game enforcement. 

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10636
Re: Proposed Federal/Trump Budget Would Cut Game Wardens in Coastal States
« Reply #55 on: March 15, 2018, 06:01:04 PM »
Thanks for putting up with us BT


I think if NOAA is cleaned up, and other federal money is going to enforcement and not being wasted then I'm for it.  I think all of us at HW want to see better, more efficient enforcement, and if these dollars are withheld they'll scavenge money from east side big game enforcement.
Not a problem.

We've already seen in recent years where no budget cuts have occurred positions in western WA that were historically "land" wardens suddenly turn into marine enforcement positions.

The "land" patrol has been suffering on both sides of the state.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Muckleshoot/white river forest hunting permits by jnichols
[Today at 12:36:40 PM]


Best 20 degree and under sleeping bags? by Stein
[Today at 12:32:15 PM]


Got your bear ID test done..🤟 by hughjorgan
[Today at 12:29:30 PM]


Gots me a new/old rockchuck rifle coming by JDHasty
[Today at 12:23:22 PM]


New bear hunter questions! by Meattoeat
[Today at 12:09:31 PM]


More Kings! by CP
[Today at 12:03:59 PM]


Heartbroken!!! by FamilyMan01
[Today at 12:03:28 PM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 11:18:29 AM]


Eastern Gray Squirrels by Elk_Guapo
[Today at 10:56:17 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 10:52:21 AM]


DR Clips and Braided Mainline by cavemann
[Today at 09:44:09 AM]


Pork belly street tacos….. by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:47:20 AM]


Hoof Rot by Rugergunsite308
[Today at 08:45:58 AM]


2025 Canning by 3boys
[Today at 08:40:04 AM]


Muzzleloader scope options by dc
[Today at 06:21:44 AM]


10 years ago- Now by blindluck
[Today at 06:18:02 AM]


Muzzleloader Scope by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:10:23 AM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by dvolmer
[Yesterday at 10:11:48 PM]


One of the lucky ones- 108 Douglas Bull Moose by Bryantmaupin
[Yesterday at 09:22:23 PM]


North Idaho Houndsmen Association Field Trial by Machias
[Yesterday at 09:11:13 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal