Free: Contests & Raffles.
Well then there's that whole idea about seating a bullet long e.g. closer to the lands to allow for a higher powder charge / velocity with less pressure. I'm referring to the Berger articles.I think, like people here have said, you have to watch for the pressure signs but also check your velocity to correlate pressure. I'm still problem solving this too. Gets frustrating at times.Earlier this week I shot a load that grouped well (for four shots at least) and was running at 2800 FPS, which is near the top of book max. So I loaded up ten rounds and went to the range yesterday to further confirm the group. The results were frustrating--would group at all. So I used the chrono for the last five rounds and, while the extreme spread was only 16 fps, these five rounds were traveling 75-90 fps faster, which put the velocity higher than book.
Is there a certain brand of chronograph I should be looking for? Seems like there's a lot more options than I anticipated.
with so many good powders, great bullets, and nice brass why bother with getting that 50 fps more and pushing it.
Not to thread highjack, but as a newbie reloader I've been wondering this--Is it obvious when a particular brass, powder, primer, bullet and charge weight isn't working with your rifle?Suppose you shoot and chrono a ladder, spread over 2 grains in 0.3g increments e.g. 50-52 or 54-56. And you see a flat spot in velocity among three charge weights based upon the chrono data. So you repeat the test around those charges, perhaps several times, to confirm that velocities are relatively stable around those charges. Then you move onto shooting three shot groups at those 3, 4 or 5 charges. Suppose none of the charges group at all, or suppose that the smallest group you get at 100 yards measures 2"-3".Is a 2"-3" group sufficiently 'tight' enough to start adjusting seating depth to shrink the group down to MOA (1" @ 100yds")? Or, would you conclude that something needs to change e.g. type of powder, type of bullet, bullet weight?