Investigator gives insane rationale for BLM shooting of unarmed woman

[wolfbait]

Investigator gives insane rationale for BLM shooting of unarmed woman

http://www.freerangereport.com/index.php/2018/06/13/blm-investigator-gives-insane-rationale-for-shooting-of-unarmed-woman/

[bradslam]

This article is ridiculous propaganda. The investigator said nothing of the kind.  His quote was: “A Bureau of Land Management officer attempted to stop the off road vehicle and an officer involved shooting occurred at that time.”  That doesn't mean that the shooting happened because they were off roading.  Obviously, something happened when the officer contacted the off-roaders that lead to the shooting and it is under investigation.  For all we know, they tried to run down the officer or pulled a gun on him.

[WAcoyotehunter]

This article is ridiculous propaganda. The investigator said nothing of the kind.  His quote was: “A Bureau of Land Management officer attempted to stop the off road vehicle and an officer involved shooting occurred at that time.”  That doesn't mean that the shooting happened because they were off roading.  Obviously, something happened when the officer contacted the off-roaders that lead to the shooting and it is under investigation.  For all we know, they tried to run down the officer or pulled a gun on him.

yep- there is no "insane rationale" in the article 

We don't know what happened other than the two in the side by side (one eventual victim) ran from the PS law enforcement and got shot around 11 pm... the article is typical BS by the Free Range Report.

[wolfbait]

This article is ridiculous propaganda. The investigator said nothing of the kind.  His quote was: “A Bureau of Land Management officer attempted to stop the off road vehicle and an officer involved shooting occurred at that time.”  That doesn't mean that the shooting happened because they were off roading.  Obviously, something happened when the officer contacted the off-roaders that lead to the shooting and it is under investigation.  For all we know, they tried to run down the officer or pulled a gun on him.

yep- there is no "insane rationale" in the article 

We don't know what happened other than the two in the side by side (one eventual victim) ran from the PS law enforcement and got shot around 11 pm... the article is typical BS by the Free Range Report.

Before you call BS Wacoyote, maybe next time pull up the article, you won't look like such a fool....

LAND MANAGEMENT OFFICER SHOOTS WOMAN OFF-ROADING IN BERDOO CANYON

https://kmir.com/2018/06/11/officer-shoots-off-roader/


June 10: BLM officer shoots off-roader in California for “failure to submit to investigation”

http://www.freerangereport.com/index.php/2018/06/13/blm-investigator-gives-insane-rationale-for-shooting-of-unarmed-woman/


Here's the other side:

OFF-ROADING ADVENTURE TURNS INTO A NIGHTMARE

https://kmir.com/2018/06/13/off-roading-adventure-turns-into-a-nightmare/

BLM has a bad reputation, do a search on BLM corruption etc..

[wolfbait]

One of Many:


BLM is Another Head on the Hydra of Corruption

https://redoubtnews.com/2017/12/blm-is-another-head-on-the-hydra-of-corruption/

[CAMPMEAT]

The couple had a flat tire and was NOT running from or threatening the BLM NAZI. Some should dig deeper instead of believing the FAKE NEWS.

[Stein]

http://www.kesq.com/news/woman-injured-following-bureau-of-land-management-officer-involved-shooting-near-indio-hills/751789909

I quickly found about a dozen other reasonable sources that have the same collection of facts.  The officer was investigating a report of illegal offroading, tried to stop the vehicle and entered into a shooting at approximately 11 pm.

Fake news is a term that unfortunately is usually applied to any news one doesn't agree with.

The investigation is ongoing, as it should be.  I wasn't there and have no opinion of what actually happened.  The officer is on leave and both the lady and guy involved on the other side will have their opportunity to tell their version of the events.

[CAMPMEAT]

They interviewed the couple and their story is totally different than the BLM, which should not be trusted after the Bundy Ranch issues. Lies out the butt..

[bigtex]

The couple had a flat tire and was NOT running from or threatening the BLM NAZI. Some should dig deeper instead of believing the FAKE NEWS.

Were you a witness?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[bigtex]

They interviewed the couple and their story is totally different than the BLM, which should not be trusted after the Bundy Ranch issues. Lies out the butt..

So similar to just about every LEO shooting no matter what the agency is. There's always 2, 10, or 100 sides to the story.

Let's see what happens when the body camera footage comes out.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[wolfbait]

We will likely never see the "investigation report" just like the corrupt WDF&wolves with wolf attacks on people.

[pianoman9701]

The sources for these articles are hardly objective. But even these indicate that the driver wouldn't stop his vehicle and an assumption could be made from the description that the officer was blocking their path and they continued to advance. Of course the couple's version is different. They're the ones who were breaking the law and possibly driving right at the officer. I'd like to see some less biased reporting on exactly what happened. The "We Hate Anything Government" newspaper is probably not going to give all the facts up. Just sayin'. 

I haven't made up my mind on this. I just don't think we're getting all of the facts from the scene.